The DOI matches its Crossref record; 9 of the 9 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Where do We Go From Here? New Perspectives on the Black Box in Strategic Human Resource Management Research
Abstract
The main objective of the present research is to briefly review the strategic human resource management (HRM) literature from multilevel theoretical perspectives to summarize what we know about mediating mechanisms in the HR–performance relationship. By doing so, we highlight future research needs to advance theoretical understanding of the ‘black box’ in strategic HRM research. Furthermore, by offering additional theoretical perspectives that can be used to understand the mediating mechanisms at different levels, we suggest future research directions that capture the complexities associated with strategic HRM through a multilevel theoretical lens. Implications of the model are discussed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage
Barney, J. (1991) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/014920639101700108 · Cited by 48,334
The norm of reciprocity: A preliminary statement
Gouldner, A. W. (1960) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.2307/2092623 · Cited by 12,001
Perceived organizational support.
Eisenberger, R., Huntington, R., Hutchison, S., & Sowa, D. (1986) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.71.3.500 · Cited by 10,023
HUSELID, M. A. (1995) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.2307/256741 · Cited by 9,342
A general multilevel SEM framework for assessing multilevel mediation
Preacher, K. J., Zyphur, M. J., & Zhang, Z. (2010) · Psychological Methods · doi:10.1037/a0020141 · Cited by 3,796
A Temporally Based Framework and Taxonomy of Team Processes
Marks, M. A., Mathieu, J. E., & Zaccaro, S. J. (2001) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.2307/259182 · Cited by 3,659
Teams in Organizations: From Input-Process-Output Models to IMOI Models
Ilgen, D. R., Hollenbeck, J. R., Johnson, M., & Jundt, D. (2005) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.56.091103.070250 · Cited by 2,273
Human resource management and performance: a review and research agenda
Guest, D. E. (1997) · The International Journal of Human Resource Management · doi:10.1080/095851997341630 · Cited by 1,908
NISHII, L. H., LEPAK, D. P., & SCHNEIDER, B. (2008) · Personnel Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.2008.00121.x · Cited by 1,410
Self-citation
Cited by
Progressing in the change journey towards sustainability in healthcare: The role of “Green” HRM
Pinzone, M., Guerci, M., Lettieri, E., & Redman, T. (2016) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.02.031 · Cited by 441
Longoni, A., Luzzini, D., & Guerci, M. (2018) · Journal of Business Ethics · doi:10.1007/s10551-016-3228-1 · Cited by 444
Cooper, B., Wang, J., Bartram, T., & Cooke, F. L. (2019) · Human Resource Management · doi:10.1002/hrm.21934 · Cited by 325
Kaufman, B. E. (2015) · Human Resource Management · doi:10.1002/hrm.21720 · Cited by 171
Bal, P. M., & de Jong, S. B. (2017) · Dignity and the Organization · doi:10.1057/978-1-137-55562-5_9 · Cited by 60
Metadata
- Authors
- Jiang, K., Takeuchi, R., & Lepak, D. P.
- Venue
- Journal of Management Studies
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2013-10-10
- Volume
- 50
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 1448-1480
- ISSN
- 0022-2380 (ISSN-L)
- 1467-6486
- OpenAlex
- W1944106288
- Cited by
- 363
- References
- 9
- FWCI
- 43.62
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
