CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 366International Business and FDIInternational Student and Expatriate ChallengesInnovation and Knowledge Management

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 113 of the 113 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Boundary Spanning in Global Organizations

Schotter, Andreas P. J., Mudambi, Ram, Doz, Yves L., Gaur, Ajai·2017·Journal of Management Studies
DOI 10.1111/joms.12256
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Global organizations are inherently complex. The spatial dispersion of activities results in organizational subunits becoming embedded in local host‐country contexts that differ from their parents’ home country contexts. These subunits are also embedded in their parents’ corporate networks, causing them to differ from their locally embedded peers. The dual embeddedness and associated complexities create complex and often implicit boundaries. In addition, the contextual and operational diversity that affects the boundaries in global organizations are continually changing. Hence managing and coordinating across different inter‐ and intra‐organizational boundaries has emerged as an important capability for the success of global organizations. So far, we have a limited understanding of the factors that affect the complexity and effectiveness of the boundary spanning function. In this article, we focus on clarifying these key issues and propose a model for effective boundary spanning in global organizations.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/joms.12256

Cites

113 of 113 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 113 references

Research works printed but not linked: 6

  1. Dunning J. H., 1993, Multinational Enterprise and the Global Economy
  2. 10.2307/259084 · DOI
  3. 10.2307/30040714 · DOI
  4. 10.2307/259037 · DOI
  5. Midler C., 2016, Inside the Renault Kwid project: how fractal engineering and frugal engineering can unlock emerging markets
  6. 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199707)18:1 <187::AID-SMJ936>3.0.CO;2-K · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 301–366 of 366

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Schotter, A. P. J., Mudambi, R., Doz, Y. L., & Gaur, A.
Affiliations
  • Western University (CA)
  • Temple University (US)
  • INSEAD (FR)
  • Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey (US)
Corresponding author
Schotter, Andreas P. J.
ORCID
Venue
Journal of Management Studies
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2017-01-16
Volume
54
Issue
4
Pages
403-421
ISSN
  • 0022-2380 (ISSN-L)
  • 1467-6486
DOI
10.1111/joms.12256
OpenAlex
W2574331141
Cited by
363
References
113
Citations by year
2026: 27 · 2025: 48 · 2024: 47 · 2023: 41 · 2022: 32 · 2021: 48 · 2020: 38 · 2019: 35 · 2018: 33 · 2017: 10
FWCI
63.09
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor (vor)
Locations
  • Journal of Management Studies (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › International Business and FDI
  • Social Sciences › Communication › International Student and Expatriate Challenges
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Innovation and Knowledge Management
Keywords
boundary spanning, international organizations, dual embeddedness, host country context, corporate networks, spatial dispersion

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review