The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Polycentric Governance of Privately Owned Resources in Circular Economy Systems
Abstract
Natural resource scarcity is giving rise to new forms of resource governance and so enhancing the transition to more sustainable resource use. One key development is the growth of circular economy systems, where residual resources are reused in closed‐loop systems. This requires an understanding of how diverse actors collectively govern the sustainable use and sharing of privately owned residual and waste resources. Our empirical analysis of three circular economy systems in Finland, the United States and Spain shows how a polycentric form of governance develops through collective action between businesses, the public sector, and societal actors based on multiple units of cooperation. Adopting insights from the polycentric governance of commons, we develop a theory of polycentric governance for privately owned residual resources. Our findings show that polycentric governance involves three main interacting elements: mutual adjustment between actors, practices for collective agency, and structures for sharing resources. As well as contributing to the understanding of collective action for sustainability, these findings also advance the interorganizational governance literature.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Markets may be missing as well because they have public goods characteristics, encompassing the challenge to resolve collective action problems [57,99].”
From Smart, circular and renewable: The role of cooperative governance in accelerating a sustainable energy transition (2025) · cites this paper as [99]
In the citing paper
“However, they can lead to collective costs through ecosystem degradation (Patala et al., 2022).”
From Effective stakeholder governance in circular economy: Insights from Italian companies (2024) · cites this paper as Patala et al., 2022
In the citing paper
“Moreover, CE projects are complex because many residual resources are scarce, suffer from a lack of scale, and are privately owned.”
From Effective stakeholder governance in circular economy: Insights from Italian companies (2024) · cites this paper as Patala et al., 2022
In the citing paper
“Not surprisingly, the authors who call for bottom-up, shared, participative or polycentric forms of stakeholder governance generally refer to CE within industrial systems (Patala et al., 2022), industries (Schultz et al., 2021, 2024), platforms for infrastructure industry (Meath et al., 2022), or ecosystems (Moggi and Dameri, 2021). That is to say, CE at meso or macro level.”
From Effective stakeholder governance in circular economy: Insights from Italian companies (2024) · cites this paper as Patala et al., 2022
In the citing paper
“Recent studies have emphasized that an effective transition to the CE at micro, meso, and macro levels requires some forms of shared or col lective stakeholder governance, such as a polycentric (Patala et al., 2022), democratic (Moggi and Dameri, 2021), or participative (Aguinaga et al., 2018) form.”
From Effective stakeholder governance in circular economy: Insights from Italian companies (2024) · cites this paper as Patala et al., 2022
Citations
Cites
Modes of Network Governance: Structure, Management, and Effectiveness
Provan, K. G., & Kenis, P. (2007) · Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory · doi:10.1093/jopart/mum015 · Cited by 4,006
The Emergence of Governance in an Open Source Community
O'Mahony, S., & Ferraro, F. (2007) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.5465/amj.2007.27169153 · Cited by 909
Introducing a Circular Economy: New Thinking with New Managerial and Policy Implications
Esposito, M., Tse, T., & Soufani, K. (2018) · California Management Review · doi:10.1177/0008125618764691 · Cited by 314
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 57
- 10.1007/s10551-020-04580-8 · DOI
- 10.1177/0007650315624205 · DOI
- 10.1287/orsc.1120.0799 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1530-9290.2008.00002.x · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1745-493X.2009.03174.x · DOI
- 10.1002/smj.2764 · DOI
- 10.5465/amr.2019.0441 · DOI
- 10.1177/0170840615593589 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1530-9290.2011.00450.x · DOI
- 10.1016/j.lrp.2009.11.003 · DOI
- Devens Eco‐Efficiency Center, 2015, 2015 Annual Report
- 10.5465/amp.2017.0056 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0148-2963(00)00195-8 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1177/0170840614563742 · DOI
- 10.1002/smj.1968 · DOI
- 10.1002/smj.3124 · DOI
- 10.1177/0001839220941010 · DOI
- 10.5465/amj.2016.4007 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.5465/amj.2015.4006 · DOI
- 10.1177/1094428112452151 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.5465/amj.2013.0416 · DOI
- 10.1111/joms.12164 · DOI
- 10.1002/smj.1975 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1467-6486.2012.01045.x · DOI
- 10.5465/amr.2006.22527458 · DOI
- 10.1177/0007650307306636 · DOI
- 10.5465/amr.2010.0314 · DOI
- 10.1177/0001839220948483 · DOI
- 10.1287/orsc.2017.1126 · DOI
- 10.1287/orsc.1060.0211 · DOI
- 10.1111/joms.12144 · DOI
- 10.1287/orsc.1090.0472 · DOI
- 10.5465/amr.2011.0188 · DOI
- McGinnis M. D., 2016, Polycentric Governance in Theory and Practice: Dimensions of Aspiration and Practical Limitations
- 10.1007/s10551-015-2693-2 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1017/CBO9780511807763 · DOI · Paper page
- Ostrom E., 2005, Understanding Institutional Diversity
- 10.1257/aer.100.3.641 · DOI · Paper page
- Ostrom E., 2014, A polycentric approach for coping with climate change, Annals Economics and Finance, 15, 97
- 10.1177/0170840612470230 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.06.059 · DOI
- Patton M. Q., 2002, Qualitative Research and Evaluation Methods
- 10.1111/joms.12515 · DOI
- 10.2307/41165267 · DOI
- 10.1111/joms.12274 · DOI
- 10.1177/0170840615580005 · DOI
- 10.1177/0149206305279601 · DOI
- Senge P., 2008, The Necessary Revolution: How Individuals and Organizations Are Working Together to Create a Sustainable World
- 10.1177/0001839219836670 · DOI
- Strauss A., 1998, Basics of Qualitative Research
- 10.5465/amj.2014.4006 · DOI
- 10.1287/orsc.2017.1191 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.09.014 · DOI
- 10.1111/joms.12270 · DOI
- 10.1177/1086026615575333 · DOI
- 10.1177/0170840607078115 · DOI
- Yin R., 2013, Case Study Research: Design and Methods
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Effective stakeholder governance in circular economy: Insights from Italian companies
Minoja, M., & Romano, G. (2024) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2024.143584 · Cited by 35
Van Opstal, W., Bocken, N., & Brusselaers, J. (2025) · Energy Research & Social Science · doi:10.1016/j.erss.2025.104049 · Cited by 20
Metadata
- Authors
- Patala, S., Albareda, L., & Halme, M.
- Affiliations
- Aalto University
- LUT University
- Venue
- Journal of Management Studies
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2022-03-25
- Volume
- 59
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1563-1596
- ISSN
- 0022-2380
- 1467-6486
- Cited by
- 105
- References
- 3
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review