Cited by 105

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Polycentric Governance of Privately Owned Resources in Circular Economy Systems

Patala, Samuli, Albareda, Laura, Halme, Minna·2022·Journal of Management Studies

Abstract

Natural resource scarcity is giving rise to new forms of resource governance and so enhancing the transition to more sustainable resource use. One key development is the growth of circular economy systems, where residual resources are reused in closed‐loop systems. This requires an understanding of how diverse actors collectively govern the sustainable use and sharing of privately owned residual and waste resources. Our empirical analysis of three circular economy systems in Finland, the United States and Spain shows how a polycentric form of governance develops through collective action between businesses, the public sector, and societal actors based on multiple units of cooperation. Adopting insights from the polycentric governance of commons, we develop a theory of polycentric governance for privately owned residual resources. Our findings show that polycentric governance involves three main interacting elements: mutual adjustment between actors, practices for collective agency, and structures for sharing resources. As well as contributing to the understanding of collective action for sustainability, these findings also advance the interorganizational governance literature.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/joms.12810

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 3 references

Research works printed but not linked: 57

  1. 10.1007/s10551-020-04580-8 · DOI
  2. 10.1177/0007650315624205 · DOI
  3. 10.1287/orsc.1120.0799 · DOI
  4. 10.1111/j.1530-9290.2008.00002.x · DOI
  5. 10.1111/j.1745-493X.2009.03174.x · DOI
  6. 10.1002/smj.2764 · DOI
  7. 10.5465/amr.2019.0441 · DOI
  8. 10.1177/0170840615593589 · DOI
  9. 10.1111/j.1530-9290.2011.00450.x · DOI
  10. 10.1016/j.lrp.2009.11.003 · DOI
  11. Devens Eco‐Efficiency Center, 2015, 2015 Annual Report
  12. 10.5465/amp.2017.0056 · DOI
  13. 10.1016/S0148-2963(00)00195-8 · DOI · Paper page
  14. 10.1177/0170840614563742 · DOI
  15. 10.1002/smj.1968 · DOI
  16. 10.1002/smj.3124 · DOI
  17. 10.1177/0001839220941010 · DOI
  18. 10.5465/amj.2016.4007 · DOI · Paper page
  19. 10.5465/amj.2015.4006 · DOI
  20. 10.1177/1094428112452151 · DOI · Paper page
  21. 10.5465/amj.2013.0416 · DOI
  22. 10.1111/joms.12164 · DOI
  23. 10.1002/smj.1975 · DOI
  24. 10.1111/j.1467-6486.2012.01045.x · DOI
  25. 10.5465/amr.2006.22527458 · DOI
  26. 10.1177/0007650307306636 · DOI
  27. 10.5465/amr.2010.0314 · DOI
  28. 10.1177/0001839220948483 · DOI
  29. 10.1287/orsc.2017.1126 · DOI
  30. 10.1287/orsc.1060.0211 · DOI
  31. 10.1111/joms.12144 · DOI
  32. 10.1287/orsc.1090.0472 · DOI
  33. 10.5465/amr.2011.0188 · DOI
  34. McGinnis M. D., 2016, Polycentric Governance in Theory and Practice: Dimensions of Aspiration and Practical Limitations
  35. 10.1007/s10551-015-2693-2 · DOI · Paper page
  36. 10.1017/CBO9780511807763 · DOI · Paper page
  37. Ostrom E., 2005, Understanding Institutional Diversity
  38. 10.1257/aer.100.3.641 · DOI · Paper page
  39. Ostrom E., 2014, A polycentric approach for coping with climate change, Annals Economics and Finance, 15, 97
  40. 10.1177/0170840612470230 · DOI
  41. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.06.059 · DOI
  42. Patton M. Q., 2002, Qualitative Research and Evaluation Methods
  43. 10.1111/joms.12515 · DOI
  44. 10.2307/41165267 · DOI
  45. 10.1111/joms.12274 · DOI
  46. 10.1177/0170840615580005 · DOI
  47. 10.1177/0149206305279601 · DOI
  48. Senge P., 2008, The Necessary Revolution: How Individuals and Organizations Are Working Together to Create a Sustainable World
  49. 10.1177/0001839219836670 · DOI
  50. Strauss A., 1998, Basics of Qualitative Research
  51. 10.5465/amj.2014.4006 · DOI
  52. 10.1287/orsc.2017.1191 · DOI
  53. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.09.014 · DOI
  54. 10.1111/joms.12270 · DOI
  55. 10.1177/1086026615575333 · DOI
  56. 10.1177/0170840607078115 · DOI
  57. Yin R., 2013, Case Study Research: Design and Methods

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 105

Metadata

Authors
Patala, S., Albareda, L., & Halme, M.
Affiliations
  • Aalto University
  • LUT University
Venue
Journal of Management Studies
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2022-03-25
Volume
59
Issue
6
Pages
1563-1596
ISSN
  • 0022-2380
  • 1467-6486
Cited by
105
References
3
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review