Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 724

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 17 of the 17 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Resilience training in the workplace from 2003 to 2014: A systematic review

Robertson, Ivan T., Cooper, Cary L., Sarkar, Mustafa, Curran, Thomas·2015·Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology

Abstract

Over a decade of research attests to the importance of resilience in the workplace for employee well‐being and performance. Yet, surprisingly, there has been no attempt to synthesize the evidence for the efficacy of resilience training in this context. The purpose of this study, therefore is to provide a systematic review of work‐based resilience training interventions. Our review identified 14 studies that investigated the impact of resilience training on personal resilience and four broad categories of dependent variables: (1) mental health and subjective well‐being outcomes, (2) psychosocial outcomes, (3) physical/biological outcomes, and (4) performance outcomes. Findings indicated that resilience training can improve personal resilience and is a useful means of developing mental health and subjective well‐being in employees. We also found that resilience training has a number of wider benefits that include enhanced psychosocial functioning and improved performance. Due to the lack of coherence in design and implementation, we cannot draw any firm conclusions about the most effective content and format of resilience training. Therefore, going forward, it is vital that future research uses comparative designs to assess the utility of different training regimes, explores whether some people might benefit more/less from resilience training, and demonstrates consistency in terms of how resilience is defined, conceptualized, developed, and assessed. Practitioner points: Despite conceptual and theoretical support for resilience training, the empirical evidence is tentative, with the exception of a large effect for mental health and subjective well‐being outcomes. Most programmes utilize a cognitive‐behavioural approach to developing resilience. At this stage, there is no definitive evidence for the most effective training content or format, but it would appear wise to include an element of one‐to‐one training and support based on individual needs.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/joop.12120

Cites

17 of 17 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 17 references

Research works printed but not linked: 45

  1. 10.7790/ejap.v5i1.145 · DOI
  2. Akers J., 2009, Systematic reviews: CRD's guidance for undertaking reviews in health care
  3. 10.1007/s11896‐008‐9030‐y · DOI · Paper page
  4. 10.1111/1440‐1630.12012 · doi:10.1111/1440-1630.12012
  5. 10.1037/h0094956 · DOI
  6. Chartered Institute of Personnel and Development, 2009, Employee outlook. Working life in a recession, Quarterly Survey Report, 1
  7. Cohen J., 1988, Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences
  8. 10.1057/9781137367839 · doi:10.1057/9781137367839
  9. 10.1016/j.psychsport.2012.04.007 · DOI · Paper page
  10. 10.1080/02678373.2011.609035 · DOI · Paper page
  11. Geller E., 2003, McGraw‐ Hill dictionary of engineering
  12. Gillham J. E., 2008, Handbook of depression in children and adolescents, 309
  13. 10.1080/17439760902992456 · DOI · Paper page
  14. Hofstede G., 2001, Culture's consequences: Comparing values, behaviors, institutions and organizations across nations
  15. 10.1093/occmed/kqr216 · DOI
  16. 10.1111/j.1365‐2923.2011.04188.x · DOI · Paper page
  17. 10.1016/j.psychsport.2014.08.004 · DOI
  18. 10.1146/annurev.ps.44 · doi:10.1146/annurev.ps.44
  19. 10.1186/2046‐4053‐3‐20 · DOI
  20. 10.1375/bech.26.2.97 · DOI
  21. 10.1016/j.paid.2014.01.015 · DOI
  22. Luthans F., 2007, Psychological capital
  23. Masten A. S., 2002, Handbook of positive psychology, 74
  24. 10.7453/gahmj.2012.1.5.013 · DOI · Paper page
  25. 10.1027/1866‐5888/a000084 · DOI
  26. Meichenbaum D., 1985, Stress inoculation training
  27. 10.1375/bech.25.4.215 · DOI
  28. 10.4278/0890‐1171‐4.3.173 · DOI
  29. Office for National Statistics, 2013, Changes in real earnings in the UK and London, 2002 to 2012
  30. 10.1080/13548506.2013.806815 · DOI
  31. 10.1037/a0021897 · DOI · Paper page
  32. Reivich K., 2002, The resilience factor: Seven essential skills for overcoming life's inevitable obstacles
  33. 10.1002/jclp.10020 · DOI · Paper page
  34. 10.1002/smi.2512 · DOI
  35. 10.1080/1091367X.2013.805141 · DOI
  36. 10.1037/spy0000003 · DOI
  37. 10.1016/j.jsams.2014.06.010 · DOI
  38. 10.1177/0963721411424740 · DOI · Paper page
  39. *Sherlock‐Storey M., 2013, Brief coaching for resilience during organisational change – an exploratory study, The Coaching Psychologist, 9, 19, 10.53841/bpstcp.2013.9.1.19 · DOI
  40. Soanes C., 2006, Oxford dictionary of English
  41. 10.1080/02678370903072555 · DOI · Paper page
  42. Wagnild G. M., 1993, Development and psychometric evaluation of the Resilience Scale, Journal of Nursing Management, 1, 165
  43. *Waite P. J., 2003, Determining the efficacy of resiliency training in the work site, Journal of Allied Health, 33, 178
  44. 10.1097/JOM.0b013e3182a2a60a · DOI · Paper page
  45. 10.1177/0149206307305562 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

See all 724

Metadata

Authors
Robertson, I. T., Cooper, C. L., Sarkar, M., & Curran, T.
Venue
Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2015-04-25
Volume
88
Issue
3
Pages
533-562
ISSN
  • 0963-1798 (ISSN-L)
  • 2044-8325
OpenAlex
W2039875005
Cited by
724
References
17
FWCI
6.02
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Resilience training in the workplace from 2003 to 2014: A systematic review. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/joop.12120
The paper
Robertson, I. T., Cooper, C. L., Sarkar, M., & Curran, T. (2015). Resilience training in the workplace from 2003 to 2014: A systematic review. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1111/joop.12120

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.