Cited by 175Personality Traits and PsychologyAttachment and Relationship DynamicsPersonality Disorders and Psychopathology

Personality‐Relationship Transactions Revisited

Neyer, Franz J., Mund, Marcus, Zimmermann, Julia, Wrzus, Cornelia·2014·Journal of Personality

Abstract

The transactional paradigm states that people create, maintain, and change their environments according to their personalities. At the same time, the environment reacts back on personality. As social relationships are part of an individual's environment, this likewise implies that there are reciprocal transactions between personality and relationships. However, earlier studies have concluded that adult personality traits are so stable that they have a stronger effect on later relationships, but that relationship effects on personality are negligible. In this article, we contend that personality‐relationship transactions should be revisited. We submit that the relative powers of personality versus relationship effects depend on the type of life transition during which the effects take place: Relationship effects on personality development are more likely to emerge in the context of rather normative and highly scripted life transitions, whereas personality effects on relationship development are more likely to occur in the context of rather non‐normative life transitions that are less regulated by social expectations. We illustrate these assumptions with examples from our own work and other findings reported in the literature. Furthermore, we theorize that effects of personality‐relationship transactions on health also vary with the normativeness of the eliciting life transition.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/jopy.12063

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Life events involving clearly defined and unambiguous sets of behavioral, cognitive, or emotional demands are most likely to lead to enduring personality changes.

    “Theory and research suggests that those life events that involve clearly defined and unambiguous sets of behavioral, cognitive, or emotional demands are most likely to lead to enduring personality changes”

    From Life Events and Personality Trait Change. (2018) · cites this paper as Neyer, Mund, Zimmermann, & Wrzus, 2014

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Neyer, F. J., Mund, M., Zimmermann, J., & Wrzus, C.
Affiliations
  • Friedrich Schiller University Jena (DE)
  • Max Planck Society (DE)
Corresponding author
Neyer, Franz J.
Venue
Journal of Personality
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2013-10-18
Volume
82
Issue
6
Pages
539-550
ISSN
  • 0022-3506 (ISSN-L)
  • 1467-6494
OpenAlex
W1584677376
Cited by
175
References
6
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 54 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 3
FWCI
8.90
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Personality (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Max Planck Institute for Plasma Physics (submittedVersion)
  • MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society) (submittedVersion)
Funders
German Research Foundation (NE 633/7-1)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Traits and Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Attachment and Relationship Dynamics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Disorders and Psychopathology
Keywords
personality stability, interpersonal relationships, life transitions, normative transitions
MeSH terms
Humans, Interpersonal Relations, Life Change Events, Personality Development, Social Environment, Social Support, Socialization

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review