Personality‐Relationship Transactions Revisited
Abstract
The transactional paradigm states that people create, maintain, and change their environments according to their personalities. At the same time, the environment reacts back on personality. As social relationships are part of an individual's environment, this likewise implies that there are reciprocal transactions between personality and relationships. However, earlier studies have concluded that adult personality traits are so stable that they have a stronger effect on later relationships, but that relationship effects on personality are negligible. In this article, we contend that personality‐relationship transactions should be revisited. We submit that the relative powers of personality versus relationship effects depend on the type of life transition during which the effects take place: Relationship effects on personality development are more likely to emerge in the context of rather normative and highly scripted life transitions, whereas personality effects on relationship development are more likely to occur in the context of rather non‐normative life transitions that are less regulated by social expectations. We illustrate these assumptions with examples from our own work and other findings reported in the literature. Furthermore, we theorize that effects of personality‐relationship transactions on health also vary with the normativeness of the eliciting life transition.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Life events involving clearly defined and unambiguous sets of behavioral, cognitive, or emotional demands are most likely to lead to enduring personality changes.
“Theory and research suggests that those life events that involve clearly defined and unambiguous sets of behavioral, cognitive, or emotional demands are most likely to lead to enduring personality changes”
From Life Events and Personality Trait Change. (2018) · cites this paper as Neyer, Mund, Zimmermann, & Wrzus, 2014
Cites
Roberts, B. W., Walton, K. E., & Viechtbauer, W. (2006) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.132.1.1 · Cited by 3,318 · see citing works
Roberts, B. W., Kuncel, N. R., Shiner, R., Caspi, A., & Goldberg, L. R. (2007) · Perspectives on Psychological Science · doi:10.1111/j.1745-6916.2007.00047.x · Cited by 2,361 · see citing works
Personality-relationship transaction in young adulthood.
Neyer, F. J., & Asendorpf, J. B. (2001) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037//0022-3514.81.6.1190 · Cited by 518 · see citing works
Self-citationLodi-Smith, J., & Roberts, B. W. (2007) · Personality and Social Psychology Review · doi:10.1177/1088868306294590 · Cited by 513 · see citing works
Replicable Item-Cluster Subcomponents in the NEO Five-Factor Inventory
Saucier, G. (1998) · Journal of Personality Assessment · doi:10.1207/s15327752jpa7002_6 · Cited by 188 · see citing works
Wagner, J., Lüdtke, O., Jonkmann, K., & Trautwein, U. (2013) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0029680 · Cited by 119 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Life Events and Personality Trait Change.
Bleidorn, W., Hopwood, C. J., & Lucas, R. E. (2018) · Journal of personality · doi:10.1111/jopy.12286 · Cited by 588 · see citing works
Processes of Personality Development in Adulthood: The TESSERA Framework
Wrzus, C., & Roberts, B. W. (2017) · Personality and Social Psychology Review · doi:10.1177/1088868316652279 · Cited by 559 · see citing works
Self-citationThe Stability and Change of Loneliness Across the Life Span: A Meta-Analysis of Longitudinal Studies
Mund, M., Freuding, M. M., Möbius, K., Horn, N., & Neyer, F. J. (2020) · Personality and Social Psychology Review · doi:10.1177/1088868319850738 · Cited by 417 · see citing works
Self-citationSelf‐esteem development and life events: A review and integrative process framework
Reitz, A. K. (2022) · Social and Personality Psychology Compass · doi:10.1111/spc3.12709 · Cited by 90 · see citing works
Reitz, A. K., & Staudinger, U. M. (2017) · Personality Development Across the Lifespan · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-804674-6.00014-4 · Cited by 17 · see citing works
- Authors
- Neyer, F. J., Mund, M., Zimmermann, J., & Wrzus, C.
- Affiliations
- Friedrich Schiller University Jena (DE)
- Max Planck Society (DE)
- Corresponding author
- Neyer, Franz J.
- Venue
- Journal of Personality
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2013-10-18
- Volume
- 82
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 539-550
- ISSN
- 0022-3506 (ISSN-L)
- 1467-6494
- OpenAlex
- W1584677376
- Cited by
- 175
- References
- 6
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 54 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 3
- FWCI
- 8.90
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Personality (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Max Planck Institute for Plasma Physics (submittedVersion)
- MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- German Research Foundation (NE 633/7-1)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Traits and Psychology
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Attachment and Relationship Dynamics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Disorders and Psychopathology
- Keywords
- personality stability, interpersonal relationships, life transitions, normative transitions
- MeSH terms
- Humans, Interpersonal Relations, Life Change Events, Personality Development, Social Environment, Social Support, Socialization
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review