CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 17Personality Traits and PsychologyAging and Gerontology ResearchEgo Development and Educational Practices

Getting older, getting better? Toward understanding positive personality development across adulthood

Reitz, Anne K., Staudinger, Ursula M.·2017·Personality Development Across the Lifespan
DOI 10.1016/b978-0-12-804674-6.00014-4
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/b978-0-12-804674-6.00014-4

Cites

124 of 124 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The most pronounced and robust normative self-esteem change is the increase during young adulthood.

    “The fact that the most pronounced and robust normative self-esteem change is the increase during young adulthood may be due to the comparatively strong sociocultural norms (i.e., developmental tasks) in this life phase in both agentic (e.g., school and work transitions) and communal (e.g., first romantic relationship, parenthood) life domains (Reitz & Staudinger, 2017).”

    From Self‐esteem development and life events: A review and integrative process framework (2022) · cites this paper as Reitz & Staudinger, 2017

  • The increase during young adulthood may be due to comparatively strong sociocultural norms in both agentic and communal life domains.

    “The fact that the most pronounced and robust normative self-esteem change is the increase during young adulthood may be due to the comparatively strong sociocultural norms (i.e., developmental tasks) in this life phase in both agentic (e.g., school and work transitions) and communal (e.g., first romantic relationship, parenthood) life domains (Reitz & Staudinger, 2017).”

    From Self‐esteem development and life events: A review and integrative process framework (2022) · cites this paper as Reitz & Staudinger, 2017

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

4 of the 128 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Related

Authors
Reitz, A. K., & Staudinger, U. M.
Affiliations
  • New York University (US)
  • Columbia University (US)
ORCID
Venue
Personality Development Across the Lifespan
Publisher
Elsevier
Published
2017
Pages
219-241
DOI
10.1016/b978-0-12-804674-6.00014-4
OpenAlex
W2603360656
Cited by
17
References
128
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 1
FWCI
8.75
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
Locations
  • Elsevier eBooks (publishedVersion)
  • Research portal (Tilburg University) (publishedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Traits and Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology › Aging and Gerontology Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Ego Development and Educational Practices
Keywords
personality maturation, adulthood, adjustment, personal growth, lifespan trajectories, agreeableness, conscientiousness, emotional stability, openness to experience, midlife, sociocultural factors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review