Cited by 158Education, Achievement, and GiftednessMotivation and Self-Concept in SportsPsychological and Educational Research Studies

Multiplicative effect of intrinsic and extrinsic motivation on academic performance: A longitudinal study of Chinese students

Liu, Yuan, Hau, Kit‐Tai, Liu, Hongyun, Wu, Jing, Wang, Xiaofang, Zheng, Xin·2020·Journal of Personality

Abstract

Objective For Chinese students, learning is seen as their duty and obligation to the society and their parents. Thus, in contrast to the Western students, the effects of extrinsic motivation on academic performance may not necessarily be always negative. The present study examined the effects of intrinsic and extrinsic motivation, as well as their multiplicative effect among Chinese students. Method A total of 13,799 students in China were followed longitudinally in three waves (Grade 10, beginning of school year, midyear, and end-of-year; 5-month interval each). The main and multiplicative effects of intrinsic and extrinsic motivations were used to predict academic growth in a latent growth model. Results The multiplicative effect between intrinsic and extrinsic motivations showed that extrinsic motivation was detrimental to academic performance for students with high intrinsic motivation. For students with low intrinsic motivation, however, the extrinsic motivation helped to improve academic performance. Worth noting, intrinsic motivation also had a moderate positive effect on academic performance. Conclusions For Chinese learners, interest is not the only key motive to learn. Extrinsic reasons could facilitate students' learning when they are not interested in the subject. Extrinsic motivation harms only for highly intrinsically motivated students.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/jopy.12512

Cites

72 of 72 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

4 of the 76 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Liu, Y., Hau, K., Liu, H., Wu, J., Wang, X., & Zheng, X.
Affiliations
  • Ministry of Education of the People's Republic of China (CN)
  • Chinese University of Hong Kong (HK)
  • Beijing Normal University (CN)
  • Shenzhen Chuangyuan Education & Technology Corporation Limited Shenzhen China
  • Shenzhen University (CN)
  • Southwest University (CN)
Corresponding author
Zheng, Xin
Venue
Journal of Personality
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2019-09-16
Volume
88
Issue
3
Pages
584-595
ISSN
  • 0022-3506 (ISSN-L)
  • 1467-6494
OpenAlex
W2972845338
Cited by
139
References
76
Citations by year
2026: 16 · 2025: 29 · 2024: 34 · 2023: 27 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 2
FWCI
9.43
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Personality (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Natural Science Foundation of China (31800950, 31571152, SWU1809677)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Education, Achievement, and Giftedness
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Motivation and Self-Concept in Sports
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Psychological and Educational Research Studies
Keywords
intrinsic motivation, extrinsic motivation, academic performance, multiplicative interaction, Chinese students, academic progress, student motivation, cultural differences in learning
MeSH terms
Academic Performance, Adolescent, Adolescent Behavior, China, Female, Humans, Learning, Longitudinal Studies, Male, Motivation, Students

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review