Cited by 18Personality Traits and PsychologyMental Health Research TopicsBehavioral Health and Interventions

Why are you (un)conscientious? The dynamic interplay of goals, states, and traits in everyday life

Open access
Di Sarno, Marco, Costantini, Giulio, Richetin, Juliette, Preti, Emanuele, Perugini, Marco·2023·Journal of Personality

Abstract

Objective: Personality involves both trait and state components, personal goals serving a crucial regulatory function for the expression of personality states. The present study investigates the dynamic interplay between conscientiousness‐related goals, conscientious personality states, and trait conscientiousness. Method: A sample of 244 community participants responded to a baseline survey (T1), a 5‐times‐a‐day Ecological Momentary Assessment (EMA) for 15 days, and a post‐EMA survey (T2). Results: Pre‐registered multilevel analyses indicated significant contemporaneous positive and negative associations between momentary conscientious and unconscientious goals and state conscientiousness, respectively. Cross‐lagged associations also emerged, with goals predicting future states of conscientiousness. A latent growth model was fitted on a subsample of participants (N = 159). Results indicated that change in trait conscientiousness from T1 to T2 was explained by growth in conscientiousness‐related goals during the EMA phase, with a mediating effect of growth in state conscientiousness. Conclusions: Overall, the results corroborate the importance of goals for modeling contemporaneous and cross‐lagged personality dynamics, both in short and longer timeframes.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/jopy.12701

Cites

9 of 9 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Authors
Di Sarno, M., Costantini, G., Richetin, J., Preti, E., & Perugini, M.
Affiliations
  • Department of Psychology University of Milano‐Bicocca Milan Italy
  • University of Milano-Bicocca (IT)
Venue
Journal of Personality
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2022-01-31
Volume
91
Issue
4
Pages
977-991
ISSN
  • 0022-3506 (ISSN-L)
  • 1467-6494
OpenAlex
W4206008546
Cited by
18
References
9
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 4
FWCI
3.88
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Personality (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • BOA (University of Milano-Bicocca) (submittedVersion)
Funders
European Commission (952464)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Traits and Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Mental Health Research Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Behavioral Health and Interventions
Keywords
conscientiousness, personality dynamics, goal regulation, personality change
MeSH terms
Ecological Momentary Assessment, Goals, Humans, Personality, Personality Disorders, Surveys and Questionnaires

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review