Cited by 187Personality Traits and PsychologyPsychological Testing and AssessmentPersonality Disorders and Psychopathology

Affect, Behaviour, Cognition and Desire in the Big Five: An Analysis of Item Content and Structure

Open access
Wilt, Joshua, Revelle, William·2015·European Journal of Personality

Abstract

Personality psychology is concerned with affect (A), behaviour (B), cognition (C) and desire (D), and personality traits have been defined conceptually as abstractions used to either explain or summarise coherent ABC (and sometimes D) patterns over time and space. However, this conceptual definition of traits has not been reflected in their operationalisation, possibly resulting in theoretical and practical limitations to current trait inventories. Thus, the goal of this project was to determine the affective, behavioural, cognitive and desire (ABCD) components of Big–Five personality traits. The first study assessed the ABCD content of items measuring Big–Five traits in order to determine the ABCD composition of traits and identify items measuring relatively high amounts of only one ABCD content. The second study examined the correlational structure of scales constructed from items assessing ABCD content via a large, web–based study. An assessment of Big–Five traits that delineates ABCD components of each trait is presented, and the discussion focuses on how this assessment builds upon current approaches of assessing personality. Copyright © 2015 European Association of Personality Psychology

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/per.2002

Cites

111 of 111 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Each of the Big Five traits is operationalized and described by different levels of affect, behavior, and cognition, and each trait represents one of these three content domains more strongly than the others.

    “Across measures, each of the Big Five traits has been shown to be operationalized and described by different levels of affect, behavior, and cognition; and each trait seems to represent one of these three content domains more strongly than the others.”

    From Life Events and Personality Trait Change. (2018) · cites this paper as Wilt & Revelle, 2015

    Study 1 (Results and Discussion; page unavailable) finds that affect, behavior, and cognition are represented in different proportions across Big Five inventories. It identifies a predominant domain for four traits, but says agreeableness has a relatively balanced representation of all three, so the claim that each trait favors one domain over the others overstates the finding. (LLM, conf=0.90)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Openness is represented primarily by cognitive content.

    “and openness is represented primarily by cognitive content (Wilt & Revelle, 2015; Table 1).”

    From Life Events and Personality Trait Change. (2018) · cites this paper as Wilt & Revelle, 2015

  • The three components of traits (affect, behavior, cognition) are differentially emphasized across the Big Five traits.

    “Even though traits are thought to reflect relatively stable patterns of affect, behavior, and cognition, these three components of traits have been found to be differentially emphasized across the Big Five traits”

    From Life Events and Personality Trait Change. (2018) · cites this paper as Wilt & Revelle, 2015

  • Neuroticism and to a lesser degree extraversion are typically represented by items that reflect affective content.

    “Specifically, neuroticism and to a lesser degree also extraversion are typically represented by items that reflect affective content”

    From Life Events and Personality Trait Change. (2018) · cites this paper as Wilt & Revelle, 2015

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 113 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 9

  1. Bryk AS Raudenbush SW 1992 Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods. Advanced qualitative techniques in the social sciences Thousand Oaks, CA Sage Publications, Inc
  2. Costa PT McCrae RR 1998 Six approaches to the explication of facet-level traits: Examples from conscientiousness European Journal of Personality 12 2 117 134
  3. Funder DC 2001 Personality Annual Review of Psychology 52 197 221 11148304
  4. Galton F 1884 Measurement of character Fortnightly Review 36 179 185
  5. Giere R 1999 Science without laws Chicago, IL University of Chicago Press
  6. Ortony A Norman DA Revelle W 2005 Effective functioning: A three level model of affect, motivation, cognition, and behavior Fellous J Arbib M Who needs emotions? The brain meets the machine 173 202 New York Oxford Univeristy Press
  7. Tellegen A 1991 Personality traits: Issues of definition, evidence and assessment Cicchetti D Grove W Thinking clearly about psychology: Essays In honor of Paul Everett Meehl Minneapolis University of Minnesota Press
  8. Watson D 2000 Mood and temperament. Emotions and social behavior New York Guilford Press
  9. Wundt W 1897 Outlines of Psychology Oxford, UK Engelmann

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wilt, J., & Revelle, W.
Affiliations
  • Case Western Reserve University (US)
  • Northwestern University (US)
Corresponding author
Wilt, Joshua
Venue
European Journal of Personality
Published
2015-07
Volume
29
Issue
4
Pages
478-497
ISSN
  • 0890-2070 (ISSN-L)
  • 1099-0984
OpenAlex
W1939947505
Cited by
187
References
113
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 21 · 2024: 29 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 27 · 2020: 23 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 4
FWCI
12.83
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • European Journal of Personality (publishedVersion, public-domain)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Mental Health (F31-MH093041)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Traits and Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Psychological Testing and Assessment
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Disorders and Psychopathology
Keywords
Big Five personality traits, affect, behavior, cognition, desire, scale structure, personality assessment

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review