Cited by 117Terrorism, Counterterrorism, and Political ViolenceSocial and Intergroup PsychologyDeath Anxiety and Social Exclusion

Compensatory Control and Its Implications for Ideological Extremism

Kay, Aaron C., Eibach, Richard P.·2013·Journal of Social Issues

Abstract

This article outlines and reviews evidence for a model of compensatory control designed to account for the motivated belief in personal and external sources of control. In doing so, we attempt to shed light on the content and strength of ideologies, including extreme libertarian, nationalist, socialist, and religious fundamentalist ideologies. We suggest that although these ideologies differ in their content they commonly function to provide people with a sense of control over otherwise random events. We propose that extreme ideologies of personal control (e.g., libertarianism) and external control (e.g., socialism, religious fundamentalism) are equifinal means of meeting a universal need to believe that things, in general, are under control—that is, that events do not unfold randomly or haphazardly. We use this model to explain how the adoption and strength of ideologies of personal and external control may vary across temporal and sociocultural contexts.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/josi.12029

Cites

68 of 68 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Psychological models (uncertainty-identity theory, meaning maintenance model, compensatory control theory) elaborate how the defensive need to alleviate uncertainty leads to group identification, ideological inflexibility, and dogmatism.

    “Psychological models, such as the uncertainty-identity theory [156], meaning maintenance model [157], and compensatory control theory [158,159], have elaborated on how the defensive need to alleviate uncertainty leads to group identification, ideological inflexibility, and dogmatism.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kay, A. C., & Eibach, R. P.
Affiliations
  • Duke University (US)
  • University of Waterloo (CA)
Corresponding author
Kay, Aaron C.
Venue
Journal of Social Issues
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2013-09
Volume
69
Issue
3
Pages
564-585
ISSN
  • 0022-4537 (ISSN-L)
  • 1540-4560
OpenAlex
W1929029263
Cited by
117
References
68
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 22 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 6
FWCI
22.63
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Social Issues (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Terrorism, Counterterrorism, and Political Violence
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Death Anxiety and Social Exclusion
Keywords
compensatory control, ideological extremism, need for control, personal control, external control, libertarianism, nationalism, socialism, religious fundamentalism

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review