Cited by 163Religion, Spirituality, and PsychologyStudy and Philosophy of ReligionReligion and Society Interactions

Reflecting on God: Religious Primes Can Reduce Neurophysiological Response to Errors

Inzlicht, Michael, Tullett, Alexa M.·2010·Psychological Science

Abstract

The world is a vast and complex place that can sometimes generate feelings of uncertainty and distress for its inhabitants. Although religion is associated with a sense of meaning and order, it remains unclear whether religious belief can actually cause people to feel less anxiety and distress. To test the anxiolytic power of religion, we conducted two experiments focusing on the error-related negativity (ERN)—a neural signal that arises from the anterior cingulate cortex and is associated with defensive responses to errors. The results indicate that for believers, conscious and nonconscious religious primes cause a decrease in ERN amplitude. In contrast, priming nonbelievers with religious concepts causes an increase in ERN amplitude. Overall, examining basic neurophysiological processes reveals the power of religion to act as a buffer against anxious reactions to self-generated, generic errors—but only for individuals who believe.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0956797610375451

Cites

38 of 38 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 39 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Inzlicht, M., & Tullett, A. M.
Affiliations
University of Toronto Scarborough (CA)
Corresponding author
Inzlicht, Michael
Venue
Psychological Science
Published
2010-06-17
Volume
21
Issue
8
Pages
1184-1190
ISSN
  • 0956-7976 (ISSN-L)
  • 1467-9280
OpenAlex
W2101250831
Cited by
163
References
39
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 18 · 2013: 17 · 2012: 20
FWCI
15.77
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Psychological Science (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Health › Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Study and Philosophy of Religion
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Religion and Society Interactions
Keywords
religious beliefs, anxiety, error-related negativity, anterior cingulate cortex, religious priming
MeSH terms
Anxiety, Electroencephalography, Evoked Potentials, Female, Humans, Male, Religion, Religion and Psychology, Stress, Psychological, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review