Cited by 170Religion, Spirituality, and PsychologyParanormal Experiences and BeliefsStudy and Philosophy of Religion

Randomness, Attributions of Arousal, and Belief in God

Kay, Aaron C., Moscovitch, David A., Laurin, Kristin·2010·Psychological Science

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0956797609357750

Cites

16 of 16 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kay, A. C., Moscovitch, D. A., & Laurin, K.
Affiliations
University of Waterloo (CA)
Corresponding author
Kay, Aaron C.
Venue
Psychological Science
Published
2010-01-08
Volume
21
Issue
2
Pages
216-218
ISSN
  • 0956-7976 (ISSN-L)
  • 1467-9280
OpenAlex
W2109252709
Cited by
170
References
16
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 18 · 2013: 18 · 2012: 18
FWCI
16.34
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Psychological Science (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Health › Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Paranormal Experiences and Beliefs
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Study and Philosophy of Religion
Keywords
randomness, belief in God, religious beliefs, randomness perception
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Anxiety, Arousal, Culture, Female, Humans, Internal-External Control, Male, Religion and Psychology, Placebo Effect, Spirituality, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review