Cited by 86Racial and Ethnic Identity ResearchHealth disparities and outcomesMental Health Treatment and Access

The Relationships among Vigilant Coping Style, Race, and Depression

Open access
LaVeist, Thomas A., Thorpe, Roland J., Pierre, Geraldine, Mance, GiShawn A., Williams, David R.·2014·Journal of Social Issues

Abstract

Although Black-white differences in depression are well documented, vigilant coping style as an explanation for the observed inequalities in depression is less understood. Using data from 718 adults in the Exploring Health Disparities in Integrated Communities (EHDIC) Study, we estimated logistic regression models to examine the cross sectional relationship between race, vigilant coping style, and depression. After controlling for demographic variables, white adults were more likely to report depression than Black adults. Moreover, when accounting for coping style, the Black-white difference in depression widened. This association persisted even with the addition of the covariates. While high rates of depression among whites compared with Blacks are well documented, the degree of the differences appears to be greater than previously reported once vigilance is accounted for. This finding suggests that if it were not for the high prevalence of vigilant coping in blacks, the well-documented black advantage regarding depression compared to whites would likely be even greater.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/josi.12058

Cites

43 of 43 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Such neurobiological changes may be precursors to racism-related vigilance and rumination, which are emerging as health risk factors.

    “Such neurobiological changes may also be precursors to racism-related vigilance and rumination which are emerging as health risk factors in their own right [406–411].”

    From Racism as a Determinant of Health: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (2015) · cites this paper as [406]

    The Discussion (page unavailable) identifies vigilant coping as a possible mental-health risk factor and reports its association with increased odds of depression. The paper does not address rumination or establish that neurobiological changes precede racism-related vigilance or rumination. (LLM, conf=0.87)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Murphy MB Nelson KS Elliot WJ Racial differences in diurnal blood pressure profile American Journal of Hypertension 1988 1 2 55A

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
LaVeist, T. A., Thorpe, R. J., Pierre, G., Mance, G. A., & Williams, D. R.
Affiliations
  • Johns Hopkins University (US)
  • American University (US)
  • Harvard University (US)
Corresponding author
LaVeist, Thomas A.
Venue
Journal of Social Issues
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2014-06
Volume
70
Issue
2
Pages
241-255
ISSN
  • 0022-4537 (ISSN-L)
  • 1540-4560
OpenAlex
W2155199556
Cited by
86
References
43
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 3
FWCI
21.65
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Social Issues (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities (NIMHD) of the National Institutes of Health (P60MD000214)
  • Pfizer, Inc. to Dr. LaVeist
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Racial and Ethnic Identity Research
  • Social Sciences › Health › Health disparities and outcomes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
Keywords
depression, racial disparities, black-white disparities, race, health disparities, sustained attention

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review