Cited by 22Consumer Attitudes and Food LabelingMeat and Animal Product QualityConsumer Market Behavior and Pricing

Consumer Behaviors toward Novel Functional and Convenient Meat Products in Poland

Olewnik‐Mikołajewska, Anna, Guzek, Dominika, Głąbska, Dominika, Gutkowska, Krystyna·2016·Journal of Sensory Studies

Abstract

Abstract The aim of the presented study was to evaluate consumer behaviors towards novel meat products in Poland. The research was conducted using PAPI method on a group of 559 Polish respondents purchasing meat and meat products. The highest share of declared “innovators” or “early adopters” was observed among respondents purchasing meat and sausages in natural food shops (75%, 83%), supermarkets (59%, 58%) and specialist meat stores (50% for sausages), whereas the lowest interest in novelty was expressed by the respondents purchasing meat and sausages in the local grocery shops (35%, 26%) and discount stores (29%, 36%). In the case of cold cuts deluxe the highest interest in novelty was observed among respondents purchasing in discount stores (71%), while the lowest – among respondents purchasing in supermarkets (27%) and natural food shops (17%). The identified trend suggesting that customers are willing to buy various novel meat products in the different places may be a contribution to the formulation of the modern marketing strategies. Practical Applications The major achievement of this study is a new insight into market strategies for novel functional meat products. It was observed that customers are willing to buy various novel meat products in the different places (cold cuts deluxe in discount stores, sausages in natural food shops). The presented study may be a valuable contribution to the recognition of the effective marketing strategies, especially in terms of distribution.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/joss.12203

Cites

58 of 58 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Olewnik‐Mikołajewska, A., Guzek, D., Głąbska, D., & Gutkowska, K.
Affiliations
Warsaw University of Life Sciences (PL)
Corresponding author
Guzek, Dominika
Venue
Journal of Sensory Studies
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2016-03-07
Volume
31
Issue
3
Pages
193-205
ISSN
  • 0887-8250 (ISSN-L)
  • 1745-459X
OpenAlex
W2296235420
Cited by
22
References
58
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 2
FWCI
3.97
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Sensory Studies (publishedVersion)
Funders
Fundo Regional para a Ciência e Tecnologia
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Consumer Attitudes and Food Labeling
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Animal Science and Zoology › Meat and Animal Product Quality
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Consumer Market Behavior and Pricing
Keywords
consumer behavior, functional meat products, retail channels, supermarkets, discount stores, grocery stores, Poland

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review