Cited by 174Innovations in Medical EducationStudent Assessment and FeedbackClinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills

Beyond individualism: professional culture and its influence on feedback

Watling, Christopher, Driessen, Erik, van der Vleuten, Cees P M, Vanstone, Meredith, Lingard, Lorelei·2013·Medical Education

Abstract

Context: Although feedback is widely considered essential to learning, its actual influence on learners is variable. Research on responsivity to feedback has tended to focus on individual rather than social or cultural influences on learning. In this study, we explored how feedback is handled within different professional cultures, and how the characteristics and values of a profession shape learners' responses to feedback. Methods: Using a constructivist grounded theory approach, we conducted 12 focus groups and nine individual interviews (with a total of 50 participants) across three cultures of professional training in, respectively, music, teacher training and medicine. Constant comparative analysis for recurring themes was conducted iteratively. Results: Each of the three professional cultures created a distinct context for learning that influenced how feedback was handled. Despite these contextual differences, credibility and constructiveness emerged as critical constants, identified by learners across cultures as essential for feedback to be perceived as meaningful. However, the definitions of credibility and constructiveness were distinct to each professional culture and the cultures varied considerably in how effectively they supported the occurrence of feedback with these critical characteristics. Conclusions: Professions define credibility and constructiveness in culturally specific ways and create contexts for learning that may either facilitate or constrain the provision of meaningful feedback. Comparison with other professional cultures may offer strategies for creating a productive feedback culture within medical education.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/medu.12150

Cites

34 of 34 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Watling, C., Driessen, E., van der Vleuten, C. P. M., Vanstone, M., & Lingard, L.
Affiliations
  • Western University (CA)
  • Maastricht University (NL)
  • Department of Education Development and Research Maastricht University Maastricht the Netherlands
  • McMaster University (CA)
Corresponding author
Watling, Christopher
Venue
Medical Education
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2013-05-12
Volume
47
Issue
6
Pages
585-594
ISSN
  • 0308-0110 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2923
OpenAlex
W2114187598
Cited by
174
References
34
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 21 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 18 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 2
FWCI
12.11
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Medical Education (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Publications (Maastricht University) (submittedVersion)
  • Radboud Repository (Radboud University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Innovations in Medical Education
  • Social Sciences › Education › Student Assessment and Feedback
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Family Practice › Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills
Keywords
feedback, professional culture, music education, teacher professional development, professional training, learner perceptions, feedback culture
MeSH terms
Attitude, Education, Medical, Education, Professional, Humans, Individuality, Learning, Music, Terminology as Topic, Students, Teaching, Organizational Culture, Professional Role, Feedback, Psychological, Qualitative Research

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review