Cited by 162Innovations in Medical EducationStudent Assessment and FeedbackClinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills

Learning culture and feedback: an international study of medical athletes and musicians

Watling, Christopher, Driessen, Erik, van der Vleuten, Cees P M, Lingard, Lorelei·2014·Medical Education

Abstract

Objectives: Feedback should facilitate learning, but within medical education it often fails to deliver on its promise. To better understand why feedback is challenging, we explored the unique perspectives of doctors who had also trained extensively in sport or music, aiming to: (i) distinguish the elements of the response to feedback that are determined by the individual learner from those determined by the learning culture, and (ii) understand how these elements interact in order to make recommendations for improving feedback in medical education. Methods: Using a constructivist grounded theory approach, we conducted semi‐structured interviews with 27 doctors or medical students who had high‐level training and competitive or performance experience in sport ( n = 15) or music ( n = 12). Data were analysed iteratively using constant comparison. Key themes were identified and their relationships critically examined to derive a conceptual understanding of feedback and its impact. Results: We identified three essential sources of influence on the meaning that feedback assumed: the individual learner; the characteristics of the feedback, and the learning culture. Individual learner traits, such as motivation and orientation toward feedback, appeared stable across learning contexts. Similarly, certain feedback characteristics, including specificity, credibility and actionability, were valued in sport, music and medicine alike. Learning culture influenced feedback in three ways: (i) by defining expectations for teachers and teacher–learner relationships; (ii) by establishing norms for and expectations of feedback, and (iii) by directing teachers' and learners' attention toward certain dimensions of performance. Learning culture therefore neither creates motivated learners nor defines ‘good feedback’; rather, it creates the conditions and opportunities that allow good feedback to occur and learners to respond. Conclusions: An adequate understanding of feedback requires an integrated approach incorporating both the individual and the learning culture. Our research offers a clear direction for medicine's learning culture: normalise feedback; promote trusting teacher–learner relationships; define clear performance goals, and ensure that the goals of learners and teachers align.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/medu.12407

Cites

28 of 28 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Watling, C., Driessen, E., van der Vleuten, C. P. M., & Lingard, L.
Affiliations
  • Western University (CA)
  • Maastricht University (NL)
  • Department of Educational Development and Research Faculty of Health Medicine, and Life Sciences Maastricht University Maastricht the Netherlands
Corresponding author
Watling, Christopher
Venue
Medical Education
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2014-06-09
Volume
48
Issue
7
Pages
713-723
ISSN
  • 0308-0110 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2923
OpenAlex
W2073862483
Cited by
162
References
28
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 21 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 1
FWCI
11.28
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Medical Education (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Publications (Maastricht University) (publishedVersion)
  • Radboud Repository (Radboud University) (submittedVersion)
  • Research Publications (Maastricht University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Innovations in Medical Education
  • Social Sciences › Education › Student Assessment and Feedback
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Family Practice › Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills
Keywords
feedback, learning culture, sports training, musical training, teacher-student relationship, student motivation, feedback specificity, feedback credibility, performance goals
MeSH terms
Attitude of Health Personnel, Education, Medical, Educational Status, Faculty, Medical, Goals, Humans, Interpersonal Relations, Learning, Music, Physicians, Sports, Students, Medical, Organizational Culture, Feedback, Psychological, Qualitative Research

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review