Cited by 224Innovations in Medical EducationStudent Assessment and FeedbackClinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills

Why medical educators may be failing at feedback.

Bing-You, Robert G.·2009·JAMA

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1001/jama.2009.1393

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bing-You, R. G.
Venue
JAMA
Published
2009-09-23
Volume
302
Issue
12
Pages
1330
ISSN
  • 0002-9955 (ISSN-L)
  • 0098-7484
OpenAlex
W1987628633
Cited by
224
References
8
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 21 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 23 · 2016: 15 · 2015: 17 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 10
FWCI
9.40
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • JAMA (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Innovations in Medical Education
  • Social Sciences › Education › Student Assessment and Feedback
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Family Practice › Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills
Keywords
feedback, medical education, medical faculty, learner performance
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Psychological, Clinical Competence, Education, Medical, Emotions, Faculty, Medical, Feedback, Humans, Knowledge of Results, Psychological, Self-Assessment, Self Concept, Students, Medical, Teaching

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review