The DOI matches its Crossref record; 32 of the 32 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Metaphysical Rationalism
Abstract
The Principle of Sufficient Reason states that everything has an explanation. But different notions of explanation yield different versions of this principle. Here a version is formulated in terms of the notion of a “grounding” explanation. Its consequences are then explored, with particular emphasis on the fact that it implies necessitarianism, the view that every truth is necessarily true. Finally, the principle is defended from a number of objections, including objections to necessitarianism. The result is a defense of a “rationalist” metaphysics, one that constitutes an alternative to the contemporary dogmas that some aspects of the world are “metaphysically brute” and that the world could in so many ways have been different.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Freedom of the Will and the Concept of a Person
Frankfurt, H. G. (1971) · The Journal of Philosophy · doi:10.2307/2024717 · Cited by 4,663
Sider, T. (2011) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199697908.001.0001 · Cited by 1,517
Essence and Modality: The Second Philosophical Perspectives Lecture
Fine, K. (1994) · Philosophical Perspectives · doi:10.2307/2214160 · Cited by 1,383
Schaffer, J. (2009) · Metametaphysics · doi:10.1093/oso/9780199546046.003.0012 · Cited by 1,382
Metaphysical Dependence: Grounding and Reduction
Rosen, G. (2010) · Modality · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199565818.003.0007 · Cited by 1,285
Fine, K. (2012) · Metaphysical Grounding · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139149136.002 · Cited by 1,235
Metametaphysics : new essays on the foundations of ontology
Chalmers, D. J., Manley, D., & Wasserman, R. (2009) · Cited by 650
Conceivability and Possibility
(2002) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198250890.001.0001 · Cited by 647
Leibniz: determinist, theist, idealist
(1995) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.32-4423 · Cited by 570
The Possibility of Physicalism
Dasgupta, S., & Journal of Philosophy Inc. (2014) · Journal of Philosophy · doi:10.5840/jphil20141119/1037 · Cited by 473
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Dasgupta, S.
- Venue
- Noûs
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2014-11-19
- Volume
- 50
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 379-418
- ISSN
- 0029-4624 (ISSN-L)
- 1468-0068
- OpenAlex
- W2321018567
- Cited by
- 265
- References
- 32
- FWCI
- 6.21
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Metaphysical Rationalism. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/nous.12082
- The paper
- Dasgupta, S. (2016). Metaphysical Rationalism. Noûs. https://doi.org/10.1111/nous.12082
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.