Cited by 296Plant biochemistry and biosynthesisPlant Gene Expression AnalysisSesquiterpenes and Asteraceae Studies

The jasmonate‐responsive Aa MYC 2 transcription factor positively regulates artemisinin biosynthesis in Artemisia annua

Open access
Shen, Qian, Lu, Xu, Yan, Tingxiang, Fu, Xueqing, Lv, Zongyou, Zhang, Fangyuan, Pan, Qifang, Wang, Guofeng +2 more·2016·New Phytologist

Abstract

Summary: The plant Artemisia annua is well known due to the production of artemisinin, a sesquiterpene lactone that is widely used in malaria treatment. Phytohormones play important roles in plant secondary metabolism, such as jasmonic acid (JA), which can induce artemisinin biosynthesis in A. annua. Nevertheless, the JA‐inducing mechanism remains poorly understood. The expression of gene Aa MYC 2 was rapidly induced by JA and Aa MYC 2 binds the G‐box‐like motifs within the promoters of gene CYP 71 AV 1 and DBR 2, which are key structural genes in the artemisinin biosynthetic pathway. Overexpression of Aa MYC 2 in A. annua significantly activated the transcript levels of CYP 71 AV 1 and DBR 2, which resulted in an increased artemisinin content. By contrast, artemisinin content was reduced in the RNA i transgenic A. annua plants in which the expression of Aa MYC 2 was suppressed. Meanwhile, the RNA i transgenic A. annua plants showed lower sensitivity to methyl jasmonate treatment than the wild‐type plants. These results demonstrate that Aa MYC 2 is a positive regulator of artemisinin biosynthesis and is of great value in genetic engineering of A. annua for increased artemisinin production.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/nph.13874

Cites

54 of 54 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Overexpression of AaMYC2 increased expression of DBR2 and CYP71AV1 involved in artemisinin biosynthesis and AaMYC2 suppression decreased artemisinin biosynthesis.

    “Using RNAi, overexpression of AaMYC2 increased expression of DBR2 and CYP71AV1 involved in artemisinin biosynthesis and AaMYC2 suppression decreased artemisinin biosynthesis (Shen et al. 2016).”

    From Enhancing artemisinin content in and delivery from Artemisia annua: a review of alternative, classical, and transgenic approaches (2021) · cites this paper as Shen et al. 2016

    The ‘AaMYC2 promotes artemisinin biosynthesis’ section (Fig. 5b, 5f) reports that overexpression increased DBR2 and CYP71AV1 transcripts, while AaMYC2 suppression reduced artemisinin content. The methods are conflated in the citing sentence: the paper used RNAi to suppress AaMYC2, not to overexpress it; overexpression used a CaMV35S-driven construct. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • JA application induces artemisinin biosynthesis by increasing expression of AaMYC2, a transcription factor that binds to the DBR2 and CYP71AV1 promoters.

    “JA application induces artemisinin biosynthesis by increasing expression of AaMYC2 , a transcription factor that binds to the DBR2 and CYP71AV1 promoters.”
  • In A. annua, two bHLH transcription factors, AabHLH1 and AaMYC2, are positive regulators of artemisinin biosynthesis.

    “In A. annua two bHLH transcription factors, AabHLH1 (Ji et al. 2014) and AaMYC2 (Shen et al. 2016) are positive regulators of artemisinin biosynthesis suggesting they may play a role in artemisinin regulation in response to cold stress.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

1 retracted

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Zhu J. 2002. Salt and drought stress signal transduction in plants. Annual Review of Plant Biology 53: 247.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Shen, Q., Lu, X., Yan, T., Fu, X., Lv, Z., Zhang, F., Pan, Q., Wang, G., Sun, X., & Tang, K.
Affiliations
  • Shanghai Jiao Tong University (CN)
  • China Pharmaceutical University (CN)
Corresponding author
Tang, Kexuan
Venue
New Phytologist
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2016-02-10
Volume
210
Issue
4
Pages
1269-1281
ISSN
  • 0028-646X (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-8137
OpenAlex
W2279195969
Cited by
296
References
54
Citations by year
2026: 23 · 2025: 30 · 2024: 34 · 2023: 32 · 2022: 34 · 2021: 53 · 2020: 22 · 2019: 27 · 2018: 23 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 9
FWCI
11.78
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • New Phytologist (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
China National High-Tech ‘863’ program (2011AA100605)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Plant biochemistry and biosynthesis
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Plant Gene Expression Analysis
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cancer Research › Sesquiterpenes and Asteraceae Studies
Keywords
artemisinin biosynthesis, Artemisia annua, MYC transcription factors, jasmonic acid, methyl jasmonate, CYP71AV1, sesquiterpene lactone biosynthesis, secondary metabolism regulation
MeSH terms
Acetates, Cyclopentanes, Plant Growth Regulators, Plant Proteins, Promoter Regions, Genetic, Transcription Factors, Gene Expression, Plants, Genetically Modified, Artemisia annua, RNA Interference, Artemisinins, Biosynthetic Pathways, Oxylipins

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review