Cited by 141Bariatric Surgery and OutcomesObesity and Health PracticesObesity, Physical Activity, Diet

A review of the psychosocial aspects of clinically severe obesity and bariatric surgery.

Open access
Sarwer, David B., Heinberg, Leslie J.·2020·American Psychologist

Abstract

For the past 2 decades, clinically severe obesity (operationalized as a body mass index ≥40 kg/m2) has increased at a more pronounced rate that less severe obesity. As a result, the surgical treatment of obesity (bariatric surgery) has become a more widely accepted, yet still underutilized, treatment for persons with severe obesity and significant weight-related health problems. Psychologists play a central role on the multidisciplinary team involved in the preoperative assessment and postoperative management of patients. They also have played a central role in clinical research which has enhanced understanding of the psychosocial and behavioral factors that contribute to the development of severe obesity as well as how those factors and others contribute to postoperative outcomes. This article, written specifically for psychologists and other mental health professionals who currently work with these patients or are considering the opportunity to do so in the future, reviews these contributions over the past 20 years. The article highlights how this work has become a fundamental part of international clinical care guidelines, which primarily focus on preoperative psychosocial screening. The article also outlines avenues for future research in the field, with a specific focus on the need for additional behavioral and psychosocial interventions to promote lifelong success after bariatric surgery. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2020 APA, all rights reserved).

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/amp0000550

Cites

139 of 139 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Women's appraisal of their body image and quality of life are negatively impacted by obesity.

    “Women's appraisal of their body image and quality of life are also negatively impacted by obesity. 11 , 22 , 23”
  • When individuals' weight loss expectation from semaglutide 2.4 mg did not match actual weight loss, users reported feelings of frustration and disappointment.

    “It was also observed that when individuals' weight loss expectation from semaglutide 2.4 mg did not match the actual weight loss, users reported feelings of frustration and disappointment [29].”

    From A Qualitative Analysis of Patient Experiences Using Semaglutide 2.4 mg for Weight Loss (2025) · cites this paper as [29]

    The Suboptimal Weight Loss section (page unavailable) discusses bariatric surgery patients who do not lose the expected amount of weight, but does not report frustration or disappointment from that mismatch. Searches for semaglutide 2.4 mg and for weight-loss expectations with those feelings found no passage addressing the claim about semaglutide users. (LLM, conf=0.76)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Ben-Porath YS & Tellegen AM (2011). Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory-2-Restructured Form (MMPI-2-RF): Manual for administration, scoring and interpretation. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sarwer, D. B., & Heinberg, L. J.
Affiliations
Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine (US)
Corresponding author
Sarwer, David B.
Venue
American Psychologist
Published
2020-02
Volume
75
Issue
2
Pages
252-264
ISSN
  • 0003-066X (ISSN-L)
  • 1935-990X
OpenAlex
W3005721901
Cited by
141
References
137
Citations by year
2026: 18 · 2025: 25 · 2024: 23 · 2023: 22 · 2022: 24 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 11 · 2018: 1
FWCI
16.91
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • American Psychologist (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • University of Minnesota
  • Novo Nordisk
  • National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (R01DK112585, R01DK108628)
  • National Institute of Dental and Craniofacial Research (R01DE026603)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Bariatric Surgery and Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Pharmacy › Obesity and Health Practices
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet
Keywords
morbid obesity, bariatric surgery, psychosocial factors, postoperative outcomes, behavioral interventions, multidisciplinary care, clinical guidelines
MeSH terms
Behavior Therapy, Humans, Obesity, Quality of Life, Weight Loss, Treatment Outcome, Bariatric Surgery

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review