Cited by 21

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Loss of strumpellin in the melanocytic lineage impairs the WASH Complex but does not affect coat colour

Tyrrell, Benjamin J., Woodham, Emma F., Spence, Heather J., Strathdee, Douglas, Insall, Robert H., Machesky, Laura M.·2016·Pigment Cell & Melanoma Research

Abstract

Summary: The five‐subunit WASH complex generates actin networks that participate in endocytic trafficking, migration and invasion in various cell types. Loss of one of the two subunits WASH or strumpellin in mice is lethal, but little is known about their role in mammals in vivo. We explored the role of strumpellin, which has previously been linked to hereditary spastic paraplegia, in the mouse melanocytic lineage. Strumpellin knockout in melanocytes revealed abnormal endocytic vesicle morphology but no impairment of migration in vitro or in vivo and no change in coat colour. Unexpectedly,WASH and filamentous actin could still localize to vesicles in the absence of strumpellin, although the shape and size of vesicles was altered. Blue native PAGE revealed the presence of two distinct WASH complexes, even in strumpellin knockout cells, revealing that the WASH complex can assemble and localize to endocytic compartments in cells in the absence of strumpellin.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/pcmr.12506

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The WASH complex functions in endocytic recycling, maintenance of endolysosomal network integrity, exocytosis, cell adhesion, and cell migration.

    “The WASH complex functions in the endocytic recycling of various types of membrane proteins, maintenance of endolysosomal network integrity, exocytosis, cell adhesion, and cell migration (11-23).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 42

  1. 10.1007/s00018-010-0390-y · DOI
  2. 10.1016/j.cell.2009.07.049 · DOI
  3. 10.1083/jcb.201009119 · DOI · Paper page
  4. 10.1016/j.cub.2015.11.020 · DOI
  5. 10.1002/gene.10197 · DOI
  6. 10.1101/gad.450107 · DOI
  7. 10.1016/j.devcel.2009.09.010 · DOI · Paper page
  8. 10.1016/j.devcel.2011.11.008 · DOI
  9. Duleh S.N., 2010, WASH and the Arp2/3 complex regulate endosome shape and trafficking, Cytoskeleton (Hoboken), 67, 193, 10.1002/cm.20437 · DOI · Paper page
  10. 10.1002/cm.21069 · DOI · Paper page
  11. 10.1074/jbc.M204011200 · DOI
  12. 10.1007/s00401-013-1115-8 · DOI
  13. 10.1242/jcs.144659 · DOI
  14. 10.1016/j.devcel.2009.09.009 · DOI · Paper page
  15. 10.1091/mbc.E12-02-0101 · DOI · Paper page
  16. 10.1242/jcs.071472 · DOI · Paper page
  17. 10.1042/BJ20111761 · DOI · Paper page
  18. 10.1016/j.cub.2006.02.068 · DOI
  19. 10.1186/s13023-015-0359-x · DOI · Paper page
  20. 10.1073/pnas.0913293107 · DOI · Paper page
  21. 10.1083/jcb.201304051 · DOI
  22. 10.1016/j.devcel.2011.07.008 · DOI
  23. 10.1242/dev.089789 · DOI
  24. 10.1242/dev.123729 · DOI
  25. 10.1038/ncomms10288 · DOI
  26. 10.1016/j.cell.2009.11.026 · DOI · Paper page
  27. Nagy A., 2003, Manipulating the Mouse Embryo: A Laboratory Manual
  28. 10.7150/ijbs.6.163 · DOI
  29. 10.1016/j.devcel.2012.12.014 · DOI
  30. 10.1038/nrm2258 · DOI
  31. 10.1038/75973 · DOI
  32. 10.1038/nrm3492 · DOI · Paper page
  33. 10.1091/mbc.E13-02-0088 · DOI · Paper page
  34. 10.1038/nmeth.2019 · DOI · Paper page
  35. 10.1038/nature07163 · DOI
  36. 10.1093/nar/25.18.3745 · DOI
  37. 10.1086/510782 · DOI · Paper page
  38. 10.1038/nprot.2006.62 · DOI
  39. 10.1002/biof.29 · DOI
  40. 10.1038/ncomms4828 · DOI · Paper page
  41. 10.1242/jcs.080986 · DOI · Paper page
  42. 10.4161/cam.21373 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Tyrrell, B. J., Woodham, E. F., Spence, H. J., Strathdee, D., Insall, R. H., & Machesky, L. M.
Affiliations
Cancer Research UK Beatson Institute College of Medical Veterinary and Life Sciences University of Glasgow Glasgow UK
Venue
Pigment Cell & Melanoma Research
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2016-09
Volume
29
Issue
5
Pages
559-571
ISSN
  • 1755-1471
  • 1755-148X
Cited by
21
References
3
Language
en
Funders
Cancer Research UK (A15673, A15672, A17196)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review