The DOI matches its Crossref record; 26 of the 27 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Clinical validity and intrarater and test–retest reliability of the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM‐5 – Clinician Version (SCID‐5‐CV)
Open accessAbstract
AIM: The Structured Clinical Interview for the DSM is one of the most used diagnostic instruments in clinical research worldwide. The current Clinician Version of the instrument (SCID-5-CV) has not yet been assessed in respect to its psychometric qualities. We aimed to assess the clinical validity and different reliability indicators (interrater test-retest, joint interview, face-to-face vs telephone application) of the SCID-5-CV in a large sample of 180 non-prototypical and psychiatric patients based on interviews conducted by raters with different levels of clinical experience. METHODS: The SCID-5-CV was administered face-to-face and by telephone by 12 psychiatrists/psychologists who took turns as raters and observers. Clinical diagnoses were established according to DSM-5 criteria and the longitudinal, expert, all data (LEAD) procedure. We calculated the percentage of agreement, diagnostic sensitivity and specificity, and the level of agreement (kappa) for diagnostic categories and specific diagnoses. RESULTS: The percentage of positive agreement between the interview and clinical diagnoses ranged between 73% and 97% and the diagnostic sensitivity/specificity were >0.70. In the joint interview, the levels of positive agreement were high (>75%) and kappa levels were >0.70 for most diagnoses. The values were less expressive, but still adequate, for interrater test-retest interviews. CONCLUSION: The SCID-5-CV presented excellent reliability and high specificity as assessed with different methods. The clinical validity of the instrument was also confirmed, which supports its use in daily clinical practice. We highlight the adequacy of the instrument to be used via telephone and the need for careful use by professionals with little experience in psychiatric clinical practice.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“The SCID-5 has good inter-rater reliability, with high positive agreement on the presence of a diagnosis (Osório et al., 2019)”
From I've Seen Enough: Measuring the Toll of Content Moderation on Mental Health (2025) · cites this paper as Osório et al., 2019
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Therefore, it was concluded that the interview can reliably be used for screening purposes in both in-patient and out-patient settings.”
From A Single-Session Process-Based Cognitive-Behavioral Intervention Combined with Multimodal Rehabilitation Treatment for Chronic Pain Associated with Emotional Disorders (2024) · cites this paper as [72]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“The results of these studies show that the validity and reliability of the SCID-S was good.”
From The effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of attachment-based family therapy for young adults with high suicidal ideation: protocol of a randomized controlled trial (2024) · cites this paper as [35]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“The SCID-5 has demonstrated excellent reliability, high specificity, and high clinical validity (Osório et al., 2019).”
From Feeling more confident to encounter negative emotions: The mediating role of distress tolerance on the relationship between self-efficacy and outcomes of exposure and response prevention for OCD (2024) · cites this paper as Osório et al., 2019
In the citing paper
“While the SCID-5 is intended to be delivered face-to-face, interviews conducted via telephone have been found to show only slightly inferior reliability, supporting their use for research purposes (61).”
From Personalised depression forecasting using mobile sensor data and ecological momentary assessment (2022) · cites this paper as [61]
In the citing paper
“The SCID-5-CV presents excellent reliability, with Cohen’s κ ranging from 0.70 to 0.75 (50).”
From Prevalence and 10-year stability of personality disorders from adolescence to young adulthood in a high-risk sample (2022) · cites this paper as [50]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measures
Beaton, D. E., Bombardier, C., Guillemin, F., & Ferraz, M. B. (2000) · Spine · doi:10.1097/00007632-200012150-00014 · Cited by 14,542
Quality criteria were proposed for measurement properties of health status questionnaires
Terwee, C. B., Bot, S. D. M., de Boer, M. R., van der Windt, D. A. W. M., Knol, D. L., Dekker, J., Bouter, L. M., & de Vet, H. C. W. (2007) · Journal of Clinical Epidemiology · doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2006.03.012 · Cited by 10,764
The Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-III-R (SCID): I: History, Rationale, and Description
Spitzer, R. L. (1992) · Archives of General Psychiatry · doi:10.1001/archpsyc.1992.01820080032005 · Cited by 4,336
Statistical Methods for Rates and Proportions.
Plewis, I., & Fleiss, J. L. (1982) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A (General) · doi:10.2307/2982107 · Cited by 1,753
The Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-III-R (SCID)
Williams, J. B. W. (1992) · Archives of General Psychiatry · doi:10.1001/archpsyc.1992.01820080038006 · Cited by 1,641
Lobbestael, J., Leurgans, M., & Arntz, A. (2011) · Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy · doi:10.1002/cpp.693 · Cited by 1,124
The Collaborative Longitudinal Personality Disorders Study: Reliability of Axis I and II Diagnoses
Zanarini, M. C., Skodol, A. E., Bender, D., Dolan, R., Sanislow, C., Schaefer, E., Morey, L. C., Grilo, C. M., Shea, M. T., McGlashan, T. H., et al. (2000) · Journal of Personality Disorders · doi:10.1521/pedi.2000.14.4.291 · Cited by 771
Psychiatric diagnosis: Are clinicians still necessary?
Spitzer, R. L. (1983) · Comprehensive Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/0010-440x(83)90032-9 · Cited by 693
Reliability Studies of Psychiatric Diagnosis
Grove, W. M. (1981) · Archives of General Psychiatry · doi:10.1001/archpsyc.1981.01780290042004 · Cited by 450
Del-Ben, C. M., Vilela, J. A. A., Crippa, J. A. D. S., Hallak, J. E. C., Labate, C. M., & Zuardi, A. W. (2001) · Revista Brasileira de Psiquiatria · doi:10.1590/s1516-44462001000300008 · Cited by 386
Self-citationZanarini, M. C., & Frankenburg, F. R. (2001) · Comprehensive Psychiatry · doi:10.1053/comp.2001.24556 · Cited by 384
High interrater reliability for the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-III-R Axis I (SCID-I)
Skre, I., Onstad, S., Torgersen, S., & Kringlen, E. (1991) · Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica · doi:10.1111/j.1600-0447.1991.tb03123.x · Cited by 353
Reliability of the structured clinical interview for DSM-iII-R: an evaluative review
Segal, D. L., Hersen, M., & Van Hasselt, V. B. (1994) · Comprehensive Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/0010-440x(94)90025-6 · Cited by 293 · cited 4×
“To our knowledge, no studies to date have assessed the psychometric properties of the SCID-5.(2) Therefore, our aim was to assess the clinical validity and different reliability indicators (interrater test–retest, joint interview, face-to-face vs telephone interview) of the SCID-5-CV in a large sample of non-prototypi…”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialTorrens, M., Serrano, D., Astals, M., Pérez-Domínguez, G., & Martín‐Santos, R. (2004) · American Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1176/appi.ajp.161.7.1231 · Cited by 230
Statistical Methods for Medical Investigations.
D’Agostino, R. B., & Everitt, B. J. (1996) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.2307/2291689 · Cited by 196
Inter-rater reliability of the SCID alcohol and substance use disorders section among adolescents
Martin, C. S., Pollock, N. K., Bukstein, O. G., & Lynch, K. G. (2000) · Drug and Alcohol Dependence · doi:10.1016/s0376-8716(99)00119-2 · Cited by 184
The role of cognitive dysfunction in the symptoms and remission from depression
Gonda, X., Pompili, M., Serafini, G., Carvalho, A. F., Rihmer, Z., & Dome, P. (2015) · Annals of General Psychiatry · doi:10.1186/s12991-015-0068-9 · Cited by 173
A Comparison of the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-III-R and Clinical Diagnoses
Steiner, J. L., Tebes, J. K., Sledge, W. H., & Walker, M. L. (1995) · The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease · doi:10.1097/00005053-199506000-00003 · Cited by 138
Weertman, A., ArntZ, A., Dreessen, L., Velzen, C. V., & Vertommen, S. (2003) · Journal of Personality Disorders · doi:10.1521/pedi.17.6.562.25359 · Cited by 126
Inter- and Intra-Rater Reliability of the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale
Flemenbaum, A., & Zimmermann, R. L. (1973) · Psychological Reports · doi:10.2466/pr0.1973.33.3.783 · Cited by 124
Sharifi, V., Assadi, S. M., Mohammadi, M. R., Amini, H., Kaviani, H., Semnani, Y., Shabani, A., Shahrivar, Z., Davari-Ashtiani, R., Shooshtari, M. H., et al. (2008) · Comprehensive Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/j.comppsych.2008.04.004 · Cited by 114
Crippa, J. A. S., de Lima Osório, F., Del-Ben, C. M., Filho, A. S., da Silva Freitas, M. C., & Loureiro, S. R. (2008) · Perspectives In Psychiatric Care · doi:10.1111/j.1744-6163.2008.00183.x · Cited by 109
Self-citationDel‐Ben, C. M., Rodrigues, C. R., & Zuardi, A. W. (1996) · PubMed · Cited by 91
Cacciola, J. S., Alterman, A. I., Rutherford, M. J., McKay, J. R., & May, D. J. (1999) · Assessment · doi:10.1177/107319119900600304 · Cited by 86
Miller, P. R. (2001) · Psychiatry Research · doi:10.1016/s0165-1781(01)00318-3 · Cited by 72
The new north american classification of Mental Disorders: DSM-5
Araújo, Á. C., & Neto, F. L. (2014) · Revista Brasileira de Terapia Comportamental e Cognitiva · Cited by 7
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- First MB, 2017, Structured Clinical Interview for DSM‐5 Disorders, Clinician Version (SCID‐5‐CV)
- First MB, 2016, Userʼs Guide for the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM‐5 Disorders, Clinician Version (SCID‐5‐CV)
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Wada, M., Noda, Y., Iwata, Y., Tsugawa, S., Yoshida, K., Tani, H., Hirano, Y., Koike, S., Sasabayashi, D., Katayama, H., et al. (2022) · Molecular Psychiatry · doi:10.1038/s41380-022-01572-0 · Cited by 113
Michelini, G., Carlisi, C. O., Eaton, N. R., Elison, J. T., Haltigan, J. D., Kotov, R., Krueger, R. F., Latzman, R. D., Li, J. J., Levin-Aspenson, H. F., et al. (2024) · World Psychiatry · doi:10.1002/wps.21225 · Cited by 109
Ayahuasca Improves Self-perception of Speech Performance in Subjects With Social Anxiety Disorder
SANTOS, R. G. D., Osório, F. D. L., Rocha, J. M., Rossi, G. N., Bouso, J. C., Rodrigues, L. S., Silveira, G. D. O., Yonamine, M., & Hallak, J. E. C. (2021) · Journal of Clinical Psychopharmacology · doi:10.1097/jcp.0000000000001428 · Cited by 97
Self-citationHaeffel, G. J., Jeronimus, B. F., Kaiser, B. N., Weaver, L. J., Soyster, P. D., Fisher, A. J., Vargas, I., Goodson, J. T., & Lu, W. (2021) · Clinical Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/21677026211002500 · Cited by 95
Green, J. E., Berk, M., Mohebbi, M., Loughman, A., McGuinness, A. J., Castle, D. J., Chatterton, M. L., Perez, J., Strandwitz, P., Athan, E., et al. (2023) · The Canadian Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1177/07067437221150508 · Cited by 87
Metadata
- Authors
- Osório, F. L., Loureiro, S. R., Hallak, J. E. C., Machado‐de‐Sousa, J. P., Ushirohira, J. M., Baes, C. V. W., Apolinario, T. D., Donadon, M. F., Bolsoni, L. M., Guimarães, T., Fracon, V. S., Silva‐Rodrigues, A. P. C., Pizeta, F. A., Souza, R. M., Sanches, R. F., dos Santos, R. G., Martin‐Santos, R., & Crippa, J. A. S.
- Affiliations
- Medical School of Ribeirão Preto São Paulo University Ribeirão Preto Brazil
- Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (BR)
- Clinics Hospital of Ribeirão Preto (BR)
- National Institute For Science and Technology (INCT‐TM, CNPq) Brasília Brazil
- ORCID
- Venue
- Psychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2019-10-14
- Volume
- 73
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 754-760
- ISSN
- 1323-1316 (ISSN-L)
- 1440-1819
- OpenAlex
- W2971897729
- Cited by
- 348
- References
- 27
- Citations by year
- 2026: 52 · 2025: 54 · 2024: 71 · 2023: 57 · 2022: 53 · 2021: 50 · 2020: 11
- FWCI
- 19.07
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Psychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (465458/2014‐9, Process 301321/2016‐7)
- Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (2014/50891‐1, Process no. 17/18000‐8)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty › Reliability and Agreement in Measurement
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Psychological Testing and Assessment
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Mental Health and Psychiatry
- Keywords
- clinical validity, inter-rater reliability, test-retest reliability, telephone administration, sensitivity and specificity, psychiatric diagnosis, DSM-5 diagnostic criteria, rater experience
- MeSH terms
- Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Mental Disorders, Female, Humans, Interview, Psychological, Male, Middle Aged, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Psychometrics, Sensitivity and Specificity, Reproducibility of Results, Observer Variation, Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Young Adult
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
