Cited by 109Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesPsychological Testing and AssessmentSurvey Methodology and Nonresponse

Comparability Between Telephone and Face-to-Face Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV in Assessing Social Anxiety Disorder

Crippa, José Alexandre S., de Lima Osório, Flávia, Del-Ben, Cristina Marta, Filho, Alaor Santos, da Silva Freitas, Maria Cecília, Loureiro, Sonia Regina·2008·Perspectives In Psychiatric Care

Abstract

PURPOSE: This article evaluates the comparability of the telephone and in-person Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV (SCID) interviews in assessing patients with social anxiety disorder (SAD) as an independent anxiety diagnosis. DESIGN AND METHODS: One hundred subjects were randomly selected and interviewed with the SCID, once by telephone and once in person (1-3 months later). FINDINGS: The prevalence of SAD assessed with the telephone interviews was 56%, whereas the in-person prevalence was 52%, with no statistically significant difference. The test-retest kappa for the 200 interviews was .84, indication of excellent agreement. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: These findings, along with the existing evidence of their validity, should encourage the use of SCID by telephone for SAD diagnostic interviews.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1744-6163.2008.00183.x

Cites

22 of 22 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Crippa, J. A. S., de Lima Osório, F., Del-Ben, C. M., Filho, A. S., da Silva Freitas, M. C., & Loureiro, S. R.
Affiliations
Universidade de São Paulo (BR)
Venue
Perspectives In Psychiatric Care
Published
2008-10
Volume
44
Issue
4
Pages
241-247
ISSN
  • 0031-5990 (ISSN-L)
  • 1744-6163
OpenAlex
W2039949983
Cited by
109
References
22
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 15 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 10
FWCI
14.06
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Perspectives In Psychiatric Care (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Scientific Electronic Library Online (São Paulo Research Foundation, Latin American and Caribbean Center on Health Sciences Information, Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico) (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Psychological Testing and Assessment
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Survey Methodology and Nonresponse
Keywords
social anxiety disorder, telephone interviews, face-to-face interviews, severe combined immunodeficiency, test-retest reliability, prevalence, psychiatric diagnosis
MeSH terms
Female, Humans, Interview, Psychological, Male, Phobic Disorders, Telephone, Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review