Cited by 90Child Nutrition and Feeding IssuesEating Disorders and BehaviorsNutrition, Health and Food Behavior

Child Eating Behaviors and Caregiver Feeding Practices in Children with Autism Spectrum Disorders

Kral, Tanja V. E., Souders, Margaret C., Tompkins, Victoria H., Remiker, Adriane M., Eriksen, Whitney T., Pinto‐Martin, Jennifer A.·2015·Public Health Nursing

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: This pilot study compared children with autism spectrum disorders (ASD) and typically developing children (TDC) on weight-related outcomes and caregiver-reported child eating behaviors and feeding practices. DESIGN AND SAMPLE: Cross-sectional study. Caregivers of 25 children with ASD and 30 TDC, ages 4-6. METHODS: Caregivers completed validated questionnaires that assessed child eating behaviors and feeding practices. Children's height, weight, and waist circumference were measured. RESULTS: Children with ASD, when compared to TDC, showed significantly greater abdominal waist circumferences (p = .01) and waist-to-height ratios (p < .001). Children with ASD with atypical oral sensory sensitivity exhibited greater food avoidance behaviors, including reluctance to eat novel foods (p = .004), being selective about the range of foods they accept (p = .03), and undereating due to negative emotions (p = .02), than children with ASD with typical oral sensory sensitivity. Caregivers of children with ASD with atypical oral sensory sensitivity reported using food to regulate negative child emotions to a greater extent than caregivers of children with typical oral sensory sensitivity (p = .02). DISCUSSION: Children with ASD, especially those with atypical oral sensory sensitivity, are at increased risk for food avoidance behaviors and may require additional support in several feeding domains.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/phn.12146

Cites

38 of 38 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kral, T. V. E., Souders, M. C., Tompkins, V. H., Remiker, A. M., Eriksen, W. T., & Pinto‐Martin, J. A.
Affiliations
  • University of Pennsylvania (US)
  • Weill Cornell Medicine (US)
Corresponding author
Kral, Tanja V. E.
Venue
Public Health Nursing
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2014-08-11
Volume
32
Issue
5
Pages
488-497
ISSN
  • 0737-1209 (ISSN-L)
  • 1525-1446
OpenAlex
W1975713535
Cited by
90
References
38
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 7
FWCI
1.78
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Public Health Nursing (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Biobehavioral Research Center at the University of Pennsylvania School of Nursing
  • Hillman Scholars Program in Nursing Innovation
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Child Nutrition and Feeding Issues
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Eating Disorders and Behaviors
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Nutrition, Health and Food Behavior
Keywords
autism spectrum disorder, child eating behavior, caregiver feeding practices, food avoidance, waist-to-height ratio, abdominal obesity, picky eating, preschool children, weight-related outcomes
MeSH terms
Autism Spectrum Disorder, Body Weight, Child, Child Behavior, Child, Preschool, Cross-Sectional Studies, Feeding Behavior, Female, Humans, Male, Pilot Projects, Surveys and Questionnaires, Case-Control Studies, Caregivers

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review