Cited by 10Grief, Bereavement, and Mental HealthDeath, Funerary Practices, and MourningPsychology and Mental Health

Persistent complex bereavement disorder: clinical utility and classification of the category proposed for Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 5th edition

Shimizu, Kanako, Kikuchi, Senichiro, Kobayashi, Toshiyuki, Kato, Satoshi·2017·Psychogeriatrics

Abstract

Aim: Persistent complex bereavement disorder (PCBD) was proposed as a bereavement‐related clinical category in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 5th edition, which included the disorder among conditions for further study. This is an independent clinical category in which intense yearning for the deceased continues for at least 12 months. However, the diagnostic features are still inconclusive. We suggest a variation of PCBD for making category from our clinical experiences. Method: We presented two representative case studies in which grief caused by bereavement was observed as the root of the pathological condition. We examined the disorder's pathological conditions, diagnoses, and appropriate treatments based on the cases we experienced. Results: Both cases involved elderly women who lost their spouse through illness and experienced prolonged grief for an extended period, resulting in hospital admission. Based on the two cases, we believe that PCBD can also include a psychotic type with hallucinations as a major symptom. While studying PCBD, we took into account specific cultural characteristics of Japanese people and their present day social environment. Conclusions: Such cases would be suggestive when determining the PCBD clinical category in the future. PCBD is considered to be clinically very useful, especially in an extremely aged society as seen in developed countries, including Japan.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/psyg.12183

Cites

42 of 42 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Shimizu, K., Kikuchi, S., Kobayashi, T., & Kato, S.
Affiliations
  • Jichi Medical University (JP)
  • Oyamafujimidai Hospital Tochigi Japan
Corresponding author
Shimizu, Kanako
Venue
Psychogeriatrics
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2016-01-18
Volume
17
Issue
1
Pages
17-24
ISSN
  • 1346-3500 (ISSN-L)
  • 1479-8301
OpenAlex
W2371021125
Cited by
10
References
42
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2018: 1
FWCI
0.45
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Psychogeriatrics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Grief, Bereavement, and Mental Health
  • Social Sciences › Anthropology › Death, Funerary Practices, and Mourning
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychology and Mental Health
Keywords
prolonged grief disorder, DSM-5, diagnostic classification, hallucinations, older women, death of a spouse, Japanese culture, aged society
MeSH terms
Adjustment Disorders, Aged, Bereavement, Depressive Disorder, Female, Grief, Humans, Japan, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review