Cited by 289Grief, Bereavement, and Mental HealthPosttraumatic Stress Disorder ResearchDeath, Funerary Practices, and Mourning

Is there more to complicated grief than depression and posttraumatic stress disorder? A test of incremental validity.

Bonanno, George A., Neria, Yuval, Mancini, Anthony, Coifman, Karin G., Litz, Brett, Insel, Beverly·2007·Journal of Abnormal Psychology

Abstract

There is growing interest in complicated grief reactions as a possible new diagnostic category for inclusion in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders. However, no research has yet shown that complicated grief has incremental validity (i.e., predicts unique variance in functioning). The authors addressed this issue in 2 studies by comparing grief, depression, and posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) symptoms with different measures of functioning (interviewer ratings, friend ratings, self-report, and autonomic arousal). The 1st study (N = 73) used longitudinal data collected at 4 and 18 months postloss, and the 2nd study (N = 447) used cross-sectional data collected 2.5-3.5 years postloss. With depression and PTSD controlled, grief emerged as a unique predictor of functioning, both cross-sectionally and prospectively. The findings provide convergent support for the incremental validity of complicated grief as an independent marker of bereavement-related psychopathology.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/0021-843x.116.2.342

Cites

59 of 59 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

3 of the 62 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bonanno, G. A., Neria, Y., Mancini, A., Coifman, K. G., Litz, B., & Insel, B.
Affiliations
  • Columbia University (US)
  • Boston University (US)
Venue
Journal of Abnormal Psychology
Published
2007-05
Volume
116
Issue
2
Pages
342-351
ISSN
  • 0021-843X (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-1846
OpenAlex
W1970652546
Cited by
288
References
62
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 17 · 2018: 19 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 20 · 2014: 26 · 2013: 21 · 2012: 22
FWCI
14.86
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Abnormal Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (R29-MH57274; R01-MH73595)
  • Spunk Fund Inc.
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Grief, Bereavement, and Mental Health
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research
  • Social Sciences › Anthropology › Death, Funerary Practices, and Mourning
Keywords
complicated grief, bereavement, incremental validity, depression, post-traumatic stress disorder, functioning, autonomic arousal, DSM-5
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Depressive Disorder, Diagnosis, Differential, Female, Grief, Heart Rate, Humans, Longitudinal Studies, Male, Middle Aged, Personality Assessment, Personality Inventory, Psychometrics, Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic, Reproducibility of Results, Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review