Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 420

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The role of digital technologies in open innovation processes: an exploratory multiple case study analysis

Open access
Urbinati, Andrea, Chiaroni, Davide, Chiesa, Vittorio, Frattini, Federico·2020·R&D Management
DOI 10.1111/radm.12313
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Digital transformation has undoubtedly become a key enabler of innovation as evidenced by the numerous firms that use digital technologies to manage their innovation processes. This issue is even more relevant today when innovation processes have become more open and require greater resources in the different implementation phases to capture and transfer knowledge within and outside the firm's boundaries. This implies additional challenges in managing the increasing amount of knowledge and information flows. Accordingly, digital technologies can be used and implemented to manage open innovation processes through easier access and sharing the knowledge created and transferred. Nevertheless, literature in these fields does not provide a structured view of how and why digital technologies are used to manage innovation processes in an open perspective. This paper aims to bridge this gap by adopting the theoretical lenses of change management to identify the managerial actions at organizational and process level that companies perform to implement digital technologies in their open innovation processes. Accordingly, the paper investigates how and why these managerial actions required for and enabled by digital technologies help firms to develop and nurture open innovation. From an empirical point of view, the exploratory multiple case study analyzes nine firms operating in different industries and varying in size, market share, and organizational structure.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/radm.12313

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Research works printed but not linked: 70

  1. Ardito L. D'Adda D. Messeni Petruzzelli A. (2017) Mapping innovation dynamics in the Internet of Things domain: A patent analysis. TechnologicalForecasting and Social Change in press. · DOI
  2. Alavi M., 1999, Knowledge management systems: issues, challenges, and benefits, Communications of the AIS, 1, 1
  3. 10.1109/LCOMM.2011.090911.111340 · DOI · Paper page
  4. Bansemir B., 2009, From idea management systems to interactive innovation management systems: designing for interaction and knowledge exchange, IDEA, 1, 1
  5. 10.1016/j.technovation.2010.03.002 · DOI · Paper page
  6. 10.1111/jpim.12302 · DOI
  7. Boss G., 2007, Cloud computing, IBM White Paper, 321, 224
  8. 10.1016/j.bdr.2015.01.008 · DOI
  9. 10.1108/BPMJ-05-2015-0072 · DOI
  10. Chesbrough H.W., 2003, Open Innovation: The New Imperative for Creating and Profiting from Technology
  11. 10.1080/08956308.2004.11671604 · DOI · Paper page
  12. Chesbrough H.W., 2006, Open innovation: a new paradigm for understanding industrial innovation, Open Innovation: Researching a New Paradigm, 400, 1
  13. 10.1111/j.1467-9310.2006.00428.x · DOI
  14. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199682461.003.0001 · DOI · Paper page
  15. 10.1016/j.technovation.2009.08.007 · DOI · Paper page
  16. 10.1108/01409170710733269 · DOI
  17. Chinneck C.andBolton S.(2013). Idea Management: The Importance of Ideas to Design Business Success. ICoRD’13 (845–857) Springer India. · DOI
  18. 10.1016/j.respol.2005.07.002 · DOI · Paper page
  19. 10.2307/2393553 · DOI · Paper page
  20. Davenport T.H., 1993, Process Innovation: Reengineering Work Through Information Technology
  21. 10.1108/13552540710736768 · DOI
  22. 10.1111/j.1467-9310.2006.00429.x · DOI
  23. 10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.03.130 · DOI · Paper page
  24. 10.25300/MISQ/2014/38.2.01 · DOI · Paper page
  25. 10.1016/j.technovation.2006.09.005 · DOI · Paper page
  26. Goodman P.S., 1982, Change in Organizations, 226
  27. 10.1016/j.future.2013.01.010 · DOI · Paper page
  28. 10.1111/dpr.12142 · DOI · Paper page
  29. 10.1016/j.cad.2010.03.002 · DOI · Paper page
  30. 10.1016/S1474-0346(04)00018-7 · DOI
  31. Kotter J.P., 2007, Leading change
  32. 10.1142/S1363919609002443 · DOI
  33. 10.1016/j.mfglet.2014.12.001 · DOI · Paper page
  34. 10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2013.09.004 · DOI · Paper page
  35. 10.1111/j.1467-6486.2009.00854.x · DOI
  36. 10.1525/cmr.2010.53.1.154 · DOI
  37. 10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2012.04.001 · DOI
  38. 10.1016/j.respol.2016.10.005 · DOI
  39. 10.1016/j.dss.2010.12.006 · DOI · Paper page
  40. 10.1016/j.compind.2007.06.012 · DOI
  41. 10.1016/j.adhoc.2012.02.016 · DOI
  42. 10.25300/MISQ/2017/41:1.03 · DOI
  43. 10.1016/j.technovation.2013.11.005 · DOI
  44. O'Donovan P., 2015, Big data in manufacturing: a systematic mapping study, Journal of Big Data, 2, 1
  45. 10.1109/MIS.2013.39 · DOI · Paper page
  46. 10.1525/cmr.2016.58.3.5 · DOI · Paper page
  47. 10.1016/j.techfore.2015.07.023 · DOI · Paper page
  48. 10.2307/41703470 · DOI
  49. 10.1016/S0165-1684(03)00090-2 · DOI
  50. Sambu S. Chen Y. andRosen D.W.(2002). Geometric tailoring: a design for manufacturing method for rapid prototyping and rapid tooling. ASME 2002 International Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference. American Society of Mechanical Engineers New York NY. pp.149–161. · DOI
  51. 10.1111/jpim.12319 · DOI
  52. Spiegler I., 2000, Knowledge management: a new idea or a recycled concept?, Communications of the AIS, 3, 2
  53. 10.1016/j.technovation.2009.08.004 · DOI
  54. 10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2010.08.001 · DOI
  55. 10.1016/j.cad.2005.02.010 · DOI · Paper page
  56. Tidd J., 1997, Managing Innovation: Integrating Technological, Market and Organizational Change
  57. 10.1080/14697010500359250 · DOI · Paper page
  58. 10.1186/s40537-015-0016-1 · DOI
  59. 10.1111/j.1467-9310.2006.00434.x · DOI · Paper page
  60. 10.1016/j.clsr.2009.11.008 · DOI · Paper page
  61. 10.1111/jpim.12125 · DOI · Paper page
  62. 10.1016/j.respol.2014.03.001 · DOI · Paper page
  63. 10.1007/978-3-642-16552-8_18 · DOI
  64. 10.25300/MISQ/2013/37.2.10 · DOI
  65. 10.1111/j.1745-493x.2012.03287.x · DOI
  66. Yin R.K., 2003, Case Study Research: Design and Methods
  67. 10.2307/20721425 · DOI
  68. 10.1287/isre.1100.0322 · DOI · Paper page
  69. 10.1287/orsc.1120.0771 · DOI · Paper page
  70. Zillner S. Oberkampf H. Bretschneider C. Zaveri A. Faix W. andNeururer S.(2014). Towards a technology roadmap for big data applications in the healthcare domain. 2014 IEEE 15th International Conference on Information Reuse and Integration (IRI) IEEE. Redwood City CA USA. pp. 291–296. · DOI

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Urbinati, A., Chiaroni, D., Chiesa, V., & Frattini, F.
Venue
R&D Management
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2018-01-16
Volume
50
Issue
1
Pages
136-160
ISSN
  • 0033-6807 (ISSN-L)
  • 1467-9310
DOI
10.1111/radm.12313
OpenAlex
W2783421592
Cited by
420
References
2
FWCI
28.91
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green
Licence
onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor (vor)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.