The DOI matches its Crossref record; 66 of the 66 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The utilization and mode of action of organic acids in the feeds of cultured aquatic animals
Abstract
The use of antibiotics in the feeds of cultured aquatic animals to mitigate infectious diseases or to boost growth performance is commonly practised. In recent years, the prophylactic use of antibiotics has been criticized which eventually led to their ban in animal production by many countries. In view of the current restrictions on antibiotic use, there is a critical need to evaluate alternatives. One potential substitute for antibiotic growth promoters in aquafeeds is organic acids and/or their respective salts. The use of dietary organic acids in the culture of aquatic animals has been the focus of much research and commercial interest recently. This review provides a comprehensive compilation of the current knowledge on the use of organic acids in aquafeeds, with emphasis on its impacts on growth, nutrient utilization, mineral availability, gut microbiota and disease resistance. Many studies have reported that some organic acids can significantly enhance the growth performance and health status of fish. Contradictory results have also been reported, which seems to depend on the aquatic animal species, type and concentrations of organic acids and the culture conditions used. Recent research indicating the beneficial impact of dietary organic acids on shrimp growth and health is highlighted. Possible mechanisms of action of these functional feed additives are discussed. Strategies for enhancing the effectiveness of dietary organic acids are given. This review aims to contribute to the sustainability of global aquaculture production by providing a viable alternative to harmful antibiotics, thereby meeting the growing consumer demand for antibiotic‐free seafood products.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Short chain fatty acids in human large intestine, portal, hepatic and venous blood
Cummings, J. H., Pomare, E. W., Branch, W. J., Naylor, C. P., & Macfarlane, G. T. (1987) · Gut · doi:10.1136/gut.28.10.1221 · Cited by 3,119
Topping, D. L., & Clifton, P. M. (2001) · Physiological Reviews · doi:10.1152/physrev.2001.81.3.1031 · Cited by 3,091
Review article: the role of butyrate on colonic function
HAMER, H. M., JONKERS, D., VENEMA, K., VANHOUTVIN, S., TROOST, F. J., & BRUMMER, R. ‐. (2008) · Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2036.2007.03562.x · Cited by 2,721
Cabello, F. C. (2006) · Environmental Microbiology · doi:10.1111/j.1462-2920.2006.01054.x · Cited by 2,329
Regulation of short-chain fatty acid production
Macfarlane, S., & Macfarlane, G. T. (2003) · Proceedings of the Nutrition Society · doi:10.1079/pns2002207 · Cited by 1,939
Preservative Agents in Foods: Mode of Action and Microbial Resistance Mechanisms
Brul, S. (1999) · International Journal of Food Microbiology · doi:10.1016/s0168-1605(99)00072-0 · Cited by 1,041
Perspectives on the use of organic acids and short chain fatty acids as antimicrobials
Ricke, S. (2003) · Poultry Science · doi:10.1093/ps/82.4.632 · Cited by 1,030
Tran, L., Nunan, L., Redman, R., Mohney, L., Pantoja, C., Fitzsimmons, K., & Lightner, D. (2013) · Diseases of Aquatic Organisms · doi:10.3354/dao02621 · Cited by 999
Cabello, F. C., Godfrey, H. P., Tomova, A., Ivanova, L., Dölz, H., Millanao, A., & Buschmann, A. H. (2013) · Environmental Microbiology · doi:10.1111/1462-2920.12134 · Cited by 898
Disease and health management in Asian aquaculture
Bondad-Reantaso, M. G., Subasinghe, R. P., Arthur, J. R., Ogawa, K., Chinabut, S., Adlard, R., Tan, Z., & Shariff, M. (2005) · Veterinary Parasitology · doi:10.1016/j.vetpar.2005.07.005 · Cited by 817
Cited by
Beneficial roles of feed additives as immunostimulants in aquaculture: a review
Dawood, M. A. O., Koshio, S., & Esteban, M. Á. (2018) · Reviews in Aquaculture · doi:10.1111/raq.12209 · Cited by 921
Metadata
- Authors
- Ng, W., & Koh, C.
- Venue
- Reviews in Aquaculture
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2016-03-03
- Volume
- 9
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 342-368
- ISSN
- 1753-5123 (ISSN-L)
- 1753-5131
- OpenAlex
- W2316565477
- Cited by
- 331
- References
- 66
- FWCI
- 25.72
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.