Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 331

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 66 of the 66 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The utilization and mode of action of organic acids in the feeds of cultured aquatic animals

Ng, Wing‐Keong, Koh, Chik‐Boon·2017·Reviews in Aquaculture
DOI 10.1111/raq.12141
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

The use of antibiotics in the feeds of cultured aquatic animals to mitigate infectious diseases or to boost growth performance is commonly practised. In recent years, the prophylactic use of antibiotics has been criticized which eventually led to their ban in animal production by many countries. In view of the current restrictions on antibiotic use, there is a critical need to evaluate alternatives. One potential substitute for antibiotic growth promoters in aquafeeds is organic acids and/or their respective salts. The use of dietary organic acids in the culture of aquatic animals has been the focus of much research and commercial interest recently. This review provides a comprehensive compilation of the current knowledge on the use of organic acids in aquafeeds, with emphasis on its impacts on growth, nutrient utilization, mineral availability, gut microbiota and disease resistance. Many studies have reported that some organic acids can significantly enhance the growth performance and health status of fish. Contradictory results have also been reported, which seems to depend on the aquatic animal species, type and concentrations of organic acids and the culture conditions used. Recent research indicating the beneficial impact of dietary organic acids on shrimp growth and health is highlighted. Possible mechanisms of action of these functional feed additives are discussed. Strategies for enhancing the effectiveness of dietary organic acids are given. This review aims to contribute to the sustainability of global aquaculture production by providing a viable alternative to harmful antibiotics, thereby meeting the growing consumer demand for antibiotic‐free seafood products.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/raq.12141

Cites

66 of 66 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Cited by

See all 331

Metadata

Authors
Ng, W., & Koh, C.
Venue
Reviews in Aquaculture
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2016-03-03
Volume
9
Issue
4
Pages
342-368
ISSN
  • 1753-5123 (ISSN-L)
  • 1753-5131
DOI
10.1111/raq.12141
OpenAlex
W2316565477
Cited by
331
References
66
FWCI
25.72
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.