The DOI matches its Crossref record; 22 of the 22 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Tuning Parameter Selection in High Dimensional Penalized Likelihood
Open accessAbstract
Summary: Determining how to select the tuning parameter appropriately is essential in penalized likelihood methods for high dimensional data analysis. We examine this problem in the setting of penalized likelihood methods for generalized linear models, where the dimensionality of covariates p is allowed to increase exponentially with the sample size n. We propose to select the tuning parameter by optimizing the generalized information criterion with an appropriate model complexity penalty. To ensure that we consistently identify the true model, a range for the model complexity penalty is identified in the generlized information criterion. We find that this model complexity penalty should diverge at the rate of some power of log (p) depending on the tail probability behaviour of the response variables. This reveals that using the Akaike information criterion or Bayes information criterion to select the tuning parameter may not be adequate for consistently identifying the true model. On the basis of our theoretical study, we propose a uniform choice of the model complexity penalty and show that the approach proposed consistently identifies the true model among candidate models with asymptotic probability 1. We justify the performance of the procedure proposed by numerical simulations and a gene expression data analysis.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Regression shrinkage and selection via the lasso
Tibshirani, R. (1996) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology · doi:10.1111/j.2517-6161.1996.tb02080.x · Cited by 51,482
Estimating the Dimension of a Model
Schwarz, G. (1978) · The Annals of Statistics · doi:10.1214/aos/1176344136 · Cited by 47,033
McCullagh, P., & Nelder, J. A. (1989) · doi:10.1007/978-1-4899-3242-6 · Cited by 16,836
Golub, T. R., Slonim, D. K., Tamayo, P., Huard, C., Gaasenbeek, M., Mesirov, J. P., Coller, H., Loh, M. L., Downing, J. R., Caligiuri, M. A., et al. (1999) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.286.5439.531 · Cited by 11,516
Variable Selection via Nonconcave Penalized Likelihood and its Oracle Properties
Fan, J., & Li, R. (2001) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.1198/016214501753382273 · Cited by 8,900
Nearly unbiased variable selection under minimax concave penalty
Zhang, C.-H. (2010) · The Annals of Statistics · doi:10.1214/09-aos729 · Cited by 3,835
Comparison of Discrimination Methods for the Classification of Tumors Using Gene Expression Data
Dudoit, S., Fridlyand, J., & Speed, T. P. (2002) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.1198/016214502753479248 · Cited by 2,672
Extended Bayesian information criteria for model selection with large model spaces
Chen, J., & Chen, Z. (2008) · Biometrika · doi:10.1093/biomet/asn034 · Cited by 2,011
Statistics for High-Dimensional Data: Methods, Theory and Applications
Bühlmann, P., & van de Geer, S. (2011) · Springer Series in Statistics · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-20192-9 · Cited by 1,680
Risk Reduction in Large Portfolios: Why Imposing the Wrong Constraints Helps
Jagannathan, R., & Ma, T. (2003) · The Journal of Finance · doi:10.1111/1540-6261.00580 · Cited by 1,462
Tuning parameter selectors for the smoothly clipped absolute deviation method
Wang, H., Li, R., & Tsai, C.-L. (2007) · Biometrika · doi:10.1093/biomet/asm053 · Cited by 768
Breheny, P., & Huang, J. (2011) · The Annals of Applied Statistics · doi:10.1214/10-aoas388 · Cited by 671
Sure independence screening in generalized linear models with NP-dimensionality
Fan, J., & Song, R. (2010) · The Annals of Statistics · doi:10.1214/10-aos798 · Cited by 630
Yang, Y. (2005) · Biometrika · doi:10.1093/biomet/92.4.937 · Cited by 605
Shrinkage Tuning Parameter Selection with a Diverging number of Parameters
Wang, H., Li, B., & Leng, C. (2009) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9868.2008.00693.x · Cited by 433
Nonconcave Penalized Likelihood With NP-Dimensionality
Fan, J., & Lv, J. (2011) · IEEE Transactions on Information Theory · doi:10.1109/tit.2011.2158486 · Cited by 427
Forward Regression for Ultra-High Dimensional Variable Screening
Wang, H. (2009) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.1198/jasa.2008.tm08516 · Cited by 366
Asymptotic Properties of Criteria for Selection of Variables in Multiple Regression
Nishii, R. (1984) · The Annals of Statistics · doi:10.1214/aos/1176346522 · Cited by 335
Regularization Parameter Selections via Generalized Information Criterion
Zhang, Y., Li, R., & Tsai, C.-L. (2010) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.1198/jasa.2009.tm08013 · Cited by 293
A unified approach to model selection and sparse recovery using regularized least squares
Lv, J., & Fan, Y. (2009) · The Annals of Statistics · doi:10.1214/09-aos683 · Cited by 252
Self-citationConsistent tuning parameter selection in high dimensional sparse linear regression
Wang, T., & Zhu, L. (2011) · Journal of Multivariate Analysis · doi:10.1016/j.jmva.2011.03.007 · Cited by 60
M-estimation using penalties or sieves
van de Geer, S. (2002) · Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference · doi:10.1016/s0378-3758(02)00270-7 · Cited by 26
Cited by
Cross-Validation With Confidence
Lei, J. (2020) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.1080/01621459.2019.1672556 · Cited by 93
Metadata
- Authors
- Fan, Y., & Tang, C. Y.
- Venue
- Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2012-12-04
- Volume
- 75
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 531-552
- ISSN
- 1369-7412 (ISSN-L)
- 1467-9868
- OpenAlex
- W2147606185
- Cited by
- 256
- References
- 22
- FWCI
- 5.09
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
