Cited by 57Suicide and Self-Harm StudiesMental Health Research TopicsMental Health via Writing

(In)stability of Capability for Suicide in Psychiatric Inpatients: Longitudinal Assessment Using Ecological Momentary Assessments

Spangenberg, Lena, Glaesmer, Heide, Hallensleben, Nina, Rath, Dajana, Forkmann, Thomas·2019·Suicide and Life-Threatening Behavior

Abstract

Objective: The study examines the temporal stability of capability for suicide (i.e., its state‐like component), because it has been recently discussed that capability for suicide may be subject to shift over time. Method: Seventy‐four psychiatric inpatients with an unipolar depressive disorder were included in the study (mean age 37.9 years, 71.6% female, 32.4% with a history of suicide attempt). After a baseline assessment with several self‐report questionnaires, ecological momentary assessments were applied over six consecutive days using smartphones. Capability for suicide was rated with three items once a day. For daily capability for suicide, descriptive and variability statistics and associations with baseline clinical characteristics (depression, suicidal ideation, childhood maltreatment, and history of suicide attempt) were analyzed. The prospective association of daily level of active suicidal ideation and daily capability was investigated by multilevel analysis. Results: Indicators of within‐person variability and temporal instability supported considerable fluctuation in daily capability for suicide. Yet the degree of temporal instability showed individual differences. Baseline and daily suicidal ideation were positively associated with daily fearlessness about death and perceived capability. Conclusion: The results provide first evidence that capability for suicide includes a dynamic short‐term component that is linked to clinical variables such as suicidal ideation.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/sltb.12547

Cites

47 of 47 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Spangenberg, L., Glaesmer, H., Hallensleben, N., Rath, D., & Forkmann, T.
Affiliations
  • Leipzig University (DE)
  • Universitätsklinikum Aachen (DE)
Corresponding author
Spangenberg, Lena
Venue
Suicide and Life-Threatening Behavior
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2019-03-04
Volume
49
Issue
6
Pages
1560-1572
ISSN
  • 0363-0234 (ISSN-L)
  • 1943-278X
OpenAlex
W2920217241
Cited by
57
References
47
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 16
FWCI
9.05
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Suicide and Life-Threatening Behavior (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (Grant No. SP 1556/1‐1, GL 818/1‐1 and FO 784/1‐1)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Suicide and Self-Harm Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Mental Health Research Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health via Writing
Keywords
temporal stability, within-person variability, suicidal ideation, major depressive disorder, psychiatric inpatients, fearlessness about death, child abuse, suicide attempt history
MeSH terms
Ecological Momentary Assessment, Adult, Depressive Disorder, Major, Major Depressive Disorder, Female, Humans, Inpatients, Longitudinal Studies, Male, Middle Aged, Prospective Studies, Self Report, Suicidal Ideation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review