Cited by 27

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Sociophonetics: The Role of Words, the Role of Context, and the Role of Words in Context

Hay, Jennifer·2018·Topics in Cognitive Science

Abstract

This paper synthesizes a wide range of literature from sociolinguistics and cognitive psychology, to argue for a central role for the “word” as a vehicle of language variation and change. Three crucially interlinked strands of research are reviewed—the role of context in associative learning, the word‐level storage of phonetic and contextual detail, and the phonetic consequences of skewed distributions of words across different contexts. I argue that the human capacity for associative learning, combined with attention to fine‐phonetic detail at the level of the word, plays a significant role in predicting a range of subtle but systematically robust observed socioindexical patterns in speech production and perception.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/tops.12326

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 64

  1. 10.1017/S004740450001037X · DOI
  2. 10.1016/j.jml.2008.06.003 · DOI
  3. 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02142.x · DOI
  4. 10.1075/dia.29.2.02bro · DOI
  5. 10.1017/S0954394502143018 · DOI
  6. 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2017.08.003 · DOI
  7. 10.1017/S0954394510000177 · DOI
  8. 10.1016/S1364-6613(00)01476-5 · DOI · Paper page
  9. 10.1006/cogp.1998.0681 · DOI · Paper page
  10. 10.1121/1.3478775 · DOI
  11. 10.1016/j.cognition.2007.03.013 · DOI
  12. 10.1080/01690965.2011.610597 · DOI
  13. 10.1016/j.jml.2011.06.005 · DOI
  14. Docherty G., 2000, Phonological knowledge: Conceptual and empirical issues, 105, 10.1093/oso/9780198241270.003.0005 · DOI
  15. 10.1515/ling-2013-0014 · DOI
  16. 10.1111/j.1749-818X.2010.00210.x · DOI
  17. Eckert P., 2000, Linguistic variation as social practice: The linguistic construction of identity in Belten High
  18. 10.1111/1467-9280.00392 · DOI
  19. 10.1037/0278-7393.28.3.458 · DOI
  20. 10.1016/j.wocn.2005.08.002 · DOI
  21. 10.1002/9781118346136.ch13 · DOI
  22. 10.1111/j.2044-8295.1975.tb01468.x · DOI
  23. 10.1037/0033-295X.105.2.251 · DOI · Paper page
  24. 10.3758/BF03196625 · DOI
  25. 10.1017/CBO9780511486678 · DOI
  26. Guy G. Hay J. &Walker A.(2008).Phonological lexical and frequency factors in coronal stop deletion in early New Zealand English. Paper presented at the 11th Laboratory Phonology Conference Wellington New Zealand.
  27. Hawkins S., 2001, Polysp: A polysystemic, phonetically‐rich approach to speech understanding, Italian Journal of Linguistics/Rivista di Linguistica, 13, 99
  28. 10.1353/lan.2016.0036 · DOI
  29. 10.1515/ling-2012-0023 · DOI
  30. 10.1016/j.cognition.2015.02.012 · DOI
  31. 10.1016/j.wocn.2017.06.005 · DOI
  32. 10.1016/j.wocn.2005.10.001 · DOI
  33. Johnson K., 1997, Talker variability in speech processing, 145
  34. 10.1006/jpho.1999.0100 · DOI
  35. 10.1037/0096-1523.32.1.120 · DOI
  36. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195331646.003.0008 · DOI
  37. 10.5334/labphon.33 · DOI
  38. 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02090.x · DOI · Paper page
  39. Labov W., 1972, Sociolinguistic patterns
  40. Labov W., 1994, Principles of linguistic change. Volume 1: Internal factors
  41. Labov W., 2001, Principles of linguistic change. Volume II: Social factors
  42. 10.1016/j.cognition.2012.09.010 · DOI
  43. 10.1046/j.0956-7976.2003.psci_1480.x · DOI
  44. 10.3758/BF03206860 · DOI
  45. 10.1075/tsl.45.08pie · DOI
  46. Pierrehumbert J., 2002, Laboratory phonology, 101
  47. 10.1016/j.wocn.2006.06.003 · DOI
  48. 10.1146/annurev-linguistics-030514-125050 · DOI
  49. 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2014.01.001 · DOI
  50. 10.1016/j.cognition.2016.09.002 · DOI
  51. 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00051 · DOI
  52. Raymond W. D., 2012, Are effects of word frequency effects of context of use? An analysis of initial fricative reduction in Spanish, Frequency Effects in Language Learning and Processing, 1, 35, 10.1515/9783110274059.35 · DOI
  53. 10.1017/S0954394516000041 · DOI
  54. 10.1126/science.274.5294.1926 · DOI · Paper page
  55. 10.1037/0278-7393.18.5.915 · DOI
  56. Schapiro A., 2015, Statistical learning, Brain Mapping: An Encyclopedic Reference, 3, 501, 10.1016/B978-0-12-397025-1.00276-1 · DOI
  57. 10.1016/j.cognition.2014.06.013 · DOI
  58. 10.1016/j.cognition.2013.02.013 · DOI · Paper page
  59. 10.3758/BF03196157 · DOI · Paper page
  60. Sóskuthy M., 2015, Proceedings of the 18th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, 10
  61. 10.1016/j.cognition.2017.05.032 · DOI
  62. 10.1016/j.tics.2015.03.007 · DOI
  63. 10.1515/labphon.2011.007 · DOI
  64. 10.1177/002383099203500301 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 27

Metadata

Authors
Hay, J.
Affiliations
New Zealand Institute of Language, Brain and Behaviour University of Canterbury
Venue
Topics in Cognitive Science
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2018-03-02
Volume
10
Issue
4
Pages
696-706
ISSN
  • 1756-8757
  • 1756-8765
Cited by
27
References
2
Language
en
Funders
  • Royal Society of New Zealand
  • John Templeton Foundation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review