Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 393

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 36 of the 36 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Resistance gene enrichment sequencing (RenSeq) enables reannotation of the NB‐LRR gene family from sequenced plant genomes and rapid mapping of resistance loci in segregating populations

Open access
Jupe, Florian, Witek, Kamil, Verweij, Walter, Śliwka, Jadwiga, Pritchard, Leighton, Etherington, Graham J., Maclean, Dan, Cock, Peter J., Leggett, Richard M., Bryan, Glenn J., Cardle, Linda, Hein, Ingo, Jones, Jonathan D.G.·2013·The Plant Journal

Abstract

Summary: RenSeq is a NB‐LRR (nucleotide binding‐site leucine‐rich repeat) gene‐targeted, Resistance gene enrichment and sequencing method that enables discovery and annotation of pathogen resistance gene family members in plant genome sequences. We successfully applied RenSeq to the sequenced potato Solanum tuberosum clone DM, and increased the number of identified NB‐LRR s from 438 to 755. The majority of these identified R gene loci reside in poorly or previously unannotated regions of the genome. Sequence and positional details on the 12 chromosomes have been established for 704 NB‐LRR s and can be accessed through a genome browser that we provide. We compared these NB‐LRR genes and the corresponding oligonucleotide baits with the highest sequence similarity and demonstrated that ~80% sequence identity is sufficient for enrichment. Analysis of the sequenced tomato S. lycopersicum ‘Heinz 1706’ extended the NB‐LRR complement to 394 loci. We further describe a methodology that applies RenSeq to rapidly identify molecular markers that co‐segregate with a pathogen resistance trait of interest. In two independent segregating populations involving the wild S olanum species S. berthaultii (Rpi‐ber2) and S. ruiz‐ceballosii (Rpi‐rzc1), we were able to apply R en S eq successfully to identify markers that co‐segregate with resistance towards the late blight pathogen P hytophthora infestans. These SNP identification workflows were designed as easy‐to‐adapt Galaxy pipelines.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/tpj.12307

Cites

36 of 36 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Metadata

Authors
Jupe, F., Witek, K., Verweij, W., Śliwka, J., Pritchard, L., Etherington, G. J., Maclean, D., Cock, P. J., Leggett, R. M., Bryan, G. J., Cardle, L., Hein, I., & Jones, J. D. G.
Venue
The Plant Journal
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2013-10-08
Volume
76
Issue
3
Pages
530-544
ISSN
  • 0960-7412 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-313X
OpenAlex
W1970697531
Cited by
393
References
36
FWCI
21.32
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
hybrid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.