Cited by 269Algal biology and biofuel productionMicrobial Metabolic Engineering and BioproductionPlant biochemistry and biosynthesis

Chlamydomonas as a model for biofuels and bio‐products production

Open access
Scranton, Melissa A., Ostrand, Joseph T., Fields, Francis J., Mayfield, Stephen P.·2015·The Plant Journal

Abstract

Summary: Developing renewable energy sources is critical to maintaining the economic growth of the planet while protecting the environment. First generation biofuels focused on food crops like corn and sugarcane for ethanol production, and soybean and palm for biodiesel production. Second generation biofuels based on cellulosic ethanol produced from terrestrial plants, has received extensive funding and recently pilot facilities have been commissioned, but to date output of fuels from these sources has fallen well short of what is needed. Recent research and pilot demonstrations have highlighted the potential of algae as one of the most promising sources of sustainable liquid transportation fuels. Algae have also been established as unique biofactories for industrial, therapeutic, and nutraceutical co‐products. Chlamydomonas reinhardtii 's long established role in the field of basic research in green algae has paved the way for understanding algal metabolism and developing genetic engineering protocols. These tools are now being utilized in C. reinhardtii and in other algal species for the development of strains to maximize biofuels and bio‐products yields from the lab to the field.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/tpj.12780

Cites

103 of 103 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Open systems encompass a range of setups, including small artificial ponds and large bodies of open water, each employing various agitation systems.

    “Open systems encompass a range of setups, including small artificial ponds and large bodies of open water, each employing various agitation systems [160].”

    From Microalgae biofuels: illuminating the path to a sustainable future amidst challenges and opportunities (2024) · cites this paper as [160]

    The OUTDOOR CULTIVATION SYSTEMS section says open systems range from small artificial ponds to large open bodies of water. It does not say that these setups employ various agitation systems; a further search for “agitation” found no supporting passage. Page information was not available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Photobioreactors allow for a wider selection of microalgae species, while open systems typically lead to the cultivation of only a few robust photoautotrophic species.

    “PBRs allow for a wider selection of microalgae species, while open systems typically lead to the cultivation of only a few robust photoautotrophic species [160].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 104 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Torzillo G Seibert M 2013 Hydrogen production by Chlamydomonas reinhardtii Handbook of Microalgal Culture: Applied Phycology and Biotechnology 2nd Richmond A Hu Q Oxford, UK John Wiley & Sons, Ltd 417 432

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Scranton, M. A., Ostrand, J. T., Fields, F. J., & Mayfield, S. P.
Affiliations
University of California San Diego (US)
Corresponding author
Mayfield, Stephen P.
Venue
The Plant Journal
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2015-02-18
Volume
82
Issue
3
Pages
523-531
ISSN
  • 0960-7412 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-313X
OpenAlex
W1967819652
Cited by
267
References
104
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 24 · 2023: 28 · 2022: 27 · 2021: 30 · 2020: 25 · 2019: 29 · 2018: 18 · 2017: 27 · 2016: 18 · 2015: 11
FWCI
0.81
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Plant Journal (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
  • OSTI OAI (U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • U.S. Department of Energy (DE‐EE0003373)
  • California Energy Commission (CILMSF 500‐10‐039)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › Algal biology and biofuel production
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Microbial Metabolic Engineering and Bioproduction
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Plant biochemistry and biosynthesis
Keywords
Chlamydomonas reinhardtii, algae, biofuels, cellulosic ethanol, biodiesel, nutraceuticals, genetic engineering of algae, algal metabolism, renewable energy, strain improvement
MeSH terms
Biotechnology, Chlamydomonas, Chloroplasts, Genetic Engineering, Hydrogen, Chlamydomonas reinhardtii, Biofuels, High-Throughput Screening Assays, Microalgae, Homologous Recombination

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review