Cited by 750Sports Performance and TrainingBody Composition Measurement TechniquesMuscle Physiology and Disorders

Strength and cross‐sectional area of human skeletal muscle.

Open access
Maughan, R J, Watson, J S, Weir, J·1983·The Journal of Physiology

Abstract

The maximum voluntary force (strength) which could be produced by the knee‐extensor muscles, with the knee held at a right angle, was measured in a group of healthy young subjects comprising twenty‐five males and twenty‐five females. Both legs were tested: data from the stronger leg only for each subject were used in the present study. Computed tomography was used to obtain a cross‐sectional image of the subjects' legs at mid‐thigh level, measured as the mid‐point between the greater trochanter and upper border of the patella. The cross‐sectional area of the knee‐extensor muscles was determined from the image obtained by computer‐based planimetry. The subjects' height and weight were measured. An estimate of body fat content was obtained from measurements of skinfold thicknesses and used to calculate lean body mass. Male subjects were taller (P less than 0.001), heavier (P less than 0.001), leaner (P less than 0.001) and stronger (P less than 0.001) than the female subjects. No significant correlation was found to exist between strength of the knee‐extensor muscles and body weight in the male or in the female subjects. In the male subjects, but not in the female group, there was a positive correlation (r = 0.50; P less than 0.01) between strength and lean body mass. Muscle cross‐sectional area of the male subjects was greater than that of the female subjects (P less than 0.001). The ratio of strength to cross‐sectional area for the male was 9.49 +/‐ 1.34 (mean +/‐ S.D.). This is greater but not significantly so, than that for females (8.92 +/‐ 1.11). In both male and female groups, there was a significant (P less than 0.01) positive correlation between muscle strength and cross‐sectional area. A wide variation in the ratio of strength to muscle cross‐sectional area was observed. This variability may be a result of anatomical differences between subjects or may result from differences in the proportions of different fibre types in the muscles. The variation between subjects is such that strength is not a useful predictive index of muscle cross‐sectional area.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1113/jphysiol.1983.sp014658

Cites

19 of 19 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

The text we found for this paper looks like another document, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The text we found for this paper looks like another document, so the self-check wasn’t run.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Maughan, R. J., Watson, J. S., & Weir, J.
ORCID
Weir, J
Venue
The Journal of Physiology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1983-05
Volume
338
Issue
1
Pages
37-49
ISSN
  • 0022-3751 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-7793
OpenAlex
W2023324665
Cited by
750
References
19
Citations by year
2026: 14 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 34 · 2023: 26 · 2022: 32 · 2021: 32 · 2020: 30 · 2019: 26 · 2018: 26 · 2017: 32 · 2016: 42 · 2015: 39 · 2014: 32 · 2013: 42 · 2012: 24
FWCI
22.14
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Journal of Physiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Orthopedics and Sports Medicine › Sports Performance and Training
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Body Composition Measurement Techniques
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Muscle Physiology and Disorders
Keywords
muscle strength, muscle cross-sectional area, knee extensors, sex differences, lean body mass, fat mass, body weight, skeletal muscle, muscle fiber composition, strength prediction
MeSH terms
Adult, Anthropometry, Biomechanical Phenomena, Body Weight, Female, Humans, Knee, Leg, Male, Muscles, Sex Factors, Thigh, Tomography, X-Ray Computed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review