Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 537

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 72 of the 72 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The ventral tegmental area revisited: is there an electrophysiological marker for dopaminergic neurons?

Open access
Margolis, Elyssa B., Lock, Hagar, Hjelmstad, Gregory O., Fields, Howard L.·2006·The Journal of Physiology
DOI 10.1113/jphysiol.2006.117069
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

The ventral tegmental area (VTA) and in particular VTA dopamine (DA) neurons are postulated to play a central role in reward, motivation and drug addiction. However, most evidence implicating VTA DA neurons in these functions is based on indirect electrophysiological characterization, rather than cytochemical identification. These physiological criteria were first established in the substantia nigra pars compacta (SNc), but their validity in the VTA is uncertain. In the current study we found that while 88 ± 2% of SNc neurons labelled by the neuronal marker NeuN were co‐labelled for the catecholamine enzyme tyrosine hydroxylase (TH), a much smaller percentage (55 ± 2%) of VTA neurons co‐expressed TH. In addition, using in vitro whole‐cell recordings we found that widely accepted physiological criteria for VTA DA neurons, including the hyperpolarization‐activated inwardly rectifying non‐specific cation current (Ih), spike duration, and inhibition by DA D2 receptor agonists, do not reliably predict the DA content of VTA neurons. We could not distinguish DA neurons from other VTA neurons by size, shape, input resistance, Ih size, or spontaneous firing rate. Although the absence of an Ih reliably predicted that a VTA neuron was non‐dopaminergic, and Ih(−) neurons differ from Ih(+) neurons in firing rate, interspike interval (ISI) standard deviation, and ISI skew, no physiological property examined here is both sensitive and selective for DA neurons in the VTA. We conclude that reliable physiological criteria for VTA DA neuron identification have yet to be determined, and that the criteria currently being used are unreliable.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1113/jphysiol.2006.117069

Cites

72 of 72 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Cited by

See all 537

Metadata

Authors
Margolis, E. B., Lock, H., Hjelmstad, G. O., & Fields, H. L.
Venue
The Journal of Physiology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2006-12-07
Volume
577
Issue
3
Pages
907-924
ISSN
  • 0022-3751 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-7793
DOI
10.1113/jphysiol.2006.117069
OpenAlex
W2123022860
Cited by
537
References
72
FWCI
7.87
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.