Cited by 93Philosophy and History of ScienceBioinformatics and Genomic NetworksInterdisciplinary Research and Collaboration

Ten questions about systems biology

Open access
Joyner, Michael J., Pedersen, Bente K.·2011·The Journal of Physiology

Abstract

In this paper we raise 'ten questions' broadly related to 'omics', the term systems biology, and why the new biology has failed to deliver major therapeutic advances for many common diseases, especially diabetes and cardiovascular disease. We argue that a fundamentally narrow and reductionist perspective about the contribution of genes and genetic variants to disease is a key reason 'omics' has failed to deliver the anticipated breakthroughs. We then point out the critical utility of key concepts from physiology like homeostasis, regulated systems and redundancy as major intellectual tools to understand how whole animals adapt to the real world. We argue that a lack of fluency in these concepts is a major stumbling block for what has been narrowly defined as 'systems biology' by some of its leading advocates. We also point out that it is a failure of regulation at multiple levels that causes many common diseases. Finally, we attempt to integrate our critique of reductionism into a broader social framework about so-called translational research in specific and the root causes of common diseases in general. Throughout we offer ideas and suggestions that might be incorporated into the current biomedical environment to advance the understanding of disease through the perspective of physiology in conjunction with epidemiology as opposed to bottom-up reductionism alone.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1113/jphysiol.2010.201509

Cites

13 of 13 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Joyner and Pedersen argue that many common diseases arise from regulatory failure across multiple levels.

    “Joyner and Pedersen (260) contend that it is a failure of regulation at multiple levels that causes many common diseases.”

    From Lack of Exercise Is a Major Cause of Chronic Diseases (2012) · cites this paper as [260]

  • They also argue that poor command of core physiological concepts hinders understanding of exercise adaptation and inactivity maladaptation.

    “They further argue that a lack of fluency to use key physiological concepts (like homeostasis, regulated systems and redundancy) as major intellectual tools to understand at multiple levels how whole animals adapt to exercise and maladapt to physical inactivity.”

    From Lack of Exercise Is a Major Cause of Chronic Diseases (2012) · cites this paper as [260]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Joyner, M. J., & Pedersen, B. K.
Affiliations
  • Mayo Clinic (US)
  • University of Copenhagen (DK)
Corresponding author
Joyner, Michael J.
Venue
The Journal of Physiology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2011-02-25
Volume
589
Issue
5
Pages
1017-1030
ISSN
  • 0022-3751 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-7793
OpenAlex
W1848160003
Cited by
93
References
13
Citations by year
2024: 2 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 15 · 2012: 7
FWCI
17.62
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Journal of Physiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research at the University of Copenhagen (University of Copenhagen) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (R01HL046493, HL-46493, HL83947, R01HL083947)
  • National Center for Research Resources (RR-24150, UL1RR024150)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History and Philosophy of Science › Philosophy and History of Science
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Bioinformatics and Genomic Networks
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Interdisciplinary Research and Collaboration
Keywords
systems biology, omics, reductionism, homeostasis, diabetes mellitus, cardiovascular disease, common diseases, translational research, genetic variants, disease regulation
MeSH terms
Animals, Genetic Variation, Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide, Systems Biology

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review