Cited by 58Advancements in Photolithography TechniquesBlock Copolymer Self-AssemblyAdvanced optical system design

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Statistical simulation of photoresists at EUV and ArF

Abstract

Requirements of resist modeling strategies for EUV and low-k1 ArF nanolithography continue to become more stringent. Resist designers are consistently faced with the task of reducing exposure dose and line roughness while simultaneously improving exposure latitude, depth-of-focus and ultimate resolution. In this work, we briefly discuss a next-generation resist model for the prediction of statistical resist responses such as line-edge roughness, line-width roughness and CD variability, as well as base lithographic responses such as exposure latitude. The model's parameterized fit to experimental data from a state-of-the art polymer-bound PAG resist irradiated at ArF and EUV will be shown. The probabilistic computation of acid generation at ArF and EUV will be discussed. The factors influencing the hypothesized primary cause of resist roughness, acid shot noise, are discussed.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1117/12.813551

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The number of absorbed EUV photons is about 14 times smaller than that of DUV photons of the same dose.

    “The number of absorbed EUV photons is about 14 times smaller than that of DUV photons of the same dose 89 .”

    From Extreme ultraviolet lithography (2024) · cites this paper as [89]

Citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Biafore, J. J., Smith, M. D., Mack, C. A., Thackeray, J. W., Gronheid, R., Robertson, S. A., Graves, T., & Blankenship, D.
Affiliations
  • KLA (United States) (US)
  • ROHM (JP)
  • IMEC (BE)
Venue
SPIE Proceedings
Publisher
SPIE
Published
2009-03-13
Volume
7273
Pages
727343
ISSN
0277-786X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2063069390
Cited by
58
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 2 · 2012: 1
FWCI
4.30
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Proceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIE (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Advancements in Photolithography Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Block Copolymer Self-Assembly
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Advanced optical system design
Keywords
EUV lithography, 193 nm lithography, line edge roughness, line width roughness, exposure latitude, depth of focus, acid production

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review