The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Statistical simulation of photoresists at EUV and ArF
Abstract
Requirements of resist modeling strategies for EUV and low-k1 ArF nanolithography continue to become more stringent. Resist designers are consistently faced with the task of reducing exposure dose and line roughness while simultaneously improving exposure latitude, depth-of-focus and ultimate resolution. In this work, we briefly discuss a next-generation resist model for the prediction of statistical resist responses such as line-edge roughness, line-width roughness and CD variability, as well as base lithographic responses such as exposure latitude. The model's parameterized fit to experimental data from a state-of-the art polymer-bound PAG resist irradiated at ArF and EUV will be shown. The probabilistic computation of acid generation at ArF and EUV will be discussed. The factors influencing the hypothesized primary cause of resist roughness, acid shot noise, are discussed.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The number of absorbed EUV photons is about 14 times smaller than that of DUV photons of the same dose.
“The number of absorbed EUV photons is about 14 times smaller than that of DUV photons of the same dose 89 .”
From Extreme ultraviolet lithography (2024) · cites this paper as [89]
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Extreme ultraviolet lithography
Kazazis, D., Santaclara, J. G., van Schoot, J., Mochi, I., & Ekinci, Y. (2024) · Nature Reviews Methods Primers · doi:10.1038/s43586-024-00361-z · Cited by 149
Key Challenges and Opportunities for Advanced Extreme Ultraviolet Lithography Photoresist Materials
Li, M., & Aqad, E. (2025) · Advanced Functional Materials · doi:10.1002/adfm.202420962 · Cited by 33
High-power EUV free-electron laser for future lithography
Nakamura, N., Kato, R., Sakai, H., Tsuchiya, K., Tanimoto, Y., Honda, Y., Miyajima, T., Shimada, M., Tanikawa, T., Tanaka, O. A., et al. (2023) · Japanese Journal of Applied Physics · doi:10.35848/1347-4065/acc18c · Cited by 31
Atomic layer deposition and its derivatives for extreme ultraviolet (EUV) photoresist applications
Le, D. N., Park, T., Hwang, S. M., Kim, J.-H., Jung, Y. C., Tiwale, N., Subramanian, A., Lee, W.-I., Choi, R., Sung, M. M., et al. (2023) · Japanese Journal of Applied Physics · doi:10.35848/1347-4065/acce43 · Cited by 26
Metadata
- Authors
- Biafore, J. J., Smith, M. D., Mack, C. A., Thackeray, J. W., Gronheid, R., Robertson, S. A., Graves, T., & Blankenship, D.
- Affiliations
- KLA (United States) (US)
- ROHM (JP)
- IMEC (BE)
- Venue
- SPIE Proceedings
- Publisher
- SPIE
- Published
- 2009-03-13
- Volume
- 7273
- Pages
- 727343
- ISSN
- 0277-786X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2063069390
- Cited by
- 58
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 2 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 4.30
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Proceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIE (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Advancements in Photolithography Techniques
- Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Block Copolymer Self-Assembly
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Advanced optical system design
- Keywords
- EUV lithography, 193 nm lithography, line edge roughness, line width roughness, exposure latitude, depth of focus, acid production
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review