The DOI matches its Crossref record; 34 of the 34 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Accuracy of finite element model‐based multi‐organ deformable image registration
Abstract
As more pretreatment imaging becomes integrated into the treatment planning process and full three‐dimensional image‐guidance becomes part of the treatment delivery the need for a deformable image registration technique becomes more apparent. A novel finite element model‐based multi‐organ deformable image registration method, MORFEUS, has been developed. The basis of this method is twofold: first, individual organ deformation can be accurately modeled by deforming the surface of the organ at one instance into the surface of the organ at another instance and assigning the material properties that allow the internal structures to be accurately deformed into the secondary position and second, multi‐organ deformable alignment can be achieved by explicitly defining the deformation of a subset of organs and assigning surface interfaces between organs. The feasibility and accuracy of the method was tested on MR thoracic and abdominal images of healthy volunteers at inhale and exhale. For the thoracic cases, the lungs and external surface were explicitly deformed and the breasts were implicitly deformed based on its relation to the lung and external surface. For the abdominal cases, the liver, spleen, and external surface were explicitly deformed and the stomach and kidneys were implicitly deformed. The average accuracy (average absolute error) of the lung and liver deformation, determined by tracking visible bifurcations, was 0.19 (s.d.: 0.09), 0.28 (s.d.: 0.12) and , in the LR, AP, and IS directions, respectively. The average accuracy of implicitly deformed organs was 0.11 (s.d.: 0.11), 0.13 (s.d.: 0.12), and , in the LR, AP, and IS directions, respectively. The average vector magnitude of the accuracy was for the lung and liver deformation and for the implicitly deformed organs. The two main processes, explicit deformation of the selected organs and finite element analysis calculations, require less than 120 and , respectively. This platform can facilitate the integration of deformable image registration into online image guidance procedures, dose calculations, and tissue response monitoring as well as performing multi‐modality image registration for purposes of treatment planning.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Marching cubes: A high resolution 3D surface construction algorithm
Lorensen, W. E., & Cline, H. E. (1987) · Proceedings of the 14th annual conference on Computer graphics and interactive techniques · doi:10.1145/37401.37422 · Cited by 10,104
Marching cubes: A high resolution 3D surface construction algorithm
Lorensen, W. E., & Cline, H. E. (1987) · ACM SIGGRAPH Computer Graphics · doi:10.1145/37402.37422 · Cited by 8,647
Fung, Y.-C. (1993) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-1-4757-2257-4 · Cited by 2,051
Multi-modal volume registration by maximization of mutual information
Wells, W. M., Viola, P., Atsumi, H., Nakajima, S., & Kikinis, R. (1996) · Medical Image Analysis · doi:10.1016/s1361-8415(01)80004-9 · Cited by 1,959
Flat-panel cone-beam computed tomography for image-guided radiation therapy
Jaffray, D. A., Siewerdsen, J. H., Wong, J. W., & Martinez, A. A. (2002) · International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics · doi:10.1016/s0360-3016(02)02884-5 · Cited by 1,330
Self-citationTowards multidimensional radiotherapy (MD-CRT): biological imaging and biological conformality
Ling, C. C., Humm, J., Larson, S., Amols, H., Fuks, Z., Leibel, S., & Koutcher, J. A. (2000) · International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics · doi:10.1016/s0360-3016(00)00467-3 · Cited by 926
Image registration by maximization of combined mutual information and gradient information
Pluim, J. P. W., Maintz, J. B. A., & Viergever, M. A. (2000) · IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging · doi:10.1109/42.876307 · Cited by 670
4D-CT imaging of a volume influenced by respiratory motion on multi-slice CT
Pan, T., Lee, T.-Y., Rietzel, E., & Chen, G. T. Y. (2004) · Medical Physics · doi:10.1118/1.1639993 · Cited by 624
Meyer, C. R., Boes, J. L., Kim, B., Bland, P. H., Zasadny, K. R., Kison, P. V., Koral, K., Frey, K. A., & Wahl, R. L. (1997) · Medical Image Analysis · doi:10.1016/s1361-8415(97)85010-4 · Cited by 460
Acquiring 4D thoracic CT scans using a multislice helical method
Keall, P. J., Starkschall, G., Shukla, H., Forster, K. M., Ortiz, V, Stevens, C. W., Vedam, S. S., George, R., Guerrero, T., & Mohan, R. (2004) · Physics in Medicine and Biology · doi:10.1088/0031-9155/49/10/015 · Cited by 399
Cited by
Brock, K. K., Mutic, S., McNutt, T. R., Li, H., & Kessler, M. L. (2017) · Medical Physics · doi:10.1002/mp.12256 · Cited by 881
Self-citationDeep learning in medical image registration: a review
Fu, Y., Lei, Y., Wang, T., Curran, W. J., Liu, T., & Yang, X. (2020) · Physics in Medicine & Biology · doi:10.1088/1361-6560/ab843e · Cited by 661
A Review of Recent Advances in Registration Techniques Applied to Minimally Invasive Therapy
Liao, R., Zhang, L., Sun, Y., Miao, S., & Chefd'Hotel, C. (2013) · IEEE Transactions on Multimedia · doi:10.1109/tmm.2013.2244869 · Cited by 71
Metadata
- Authors
- Brock, K. K., Sharpe, M. B., Dawson, L. A., Kim, S. M., & Jaffray, D. A.
- Venue
- Medical Physics
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2005-05-20
- Volume
- 32
- Issue
- 6Part1
- Pages
- 1647-1659
- ISSN
- 0094-2405 (ISSN-L)
- 2473-4209
- OpenAlex
- W2098533585
- Cited by
- 375
- References
- 34
- FWCI
- 25.93
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Accuracy of finite element model‐based multi‐organ deformable image registration. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1118/1.1915012
- The paper
- Brock, K. K., Sharpe, M. B., Dawson, L. A., Kim, S. M., & Jaffray, D. A. (2005). Accuracy of finite element model‐based multi‐organ deformable image registration. Medical Physics. https://doi.org/10.1118/1.1915012
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.