Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 375

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 34 of the 34 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Accuracy of finite element model‐based multi‐organ deformable image registration

Brock, K. K., Sharpe, M. B., Dawson, L. A., Kim, S. M., Jaffray, D. A.·2005·Medical Physics

Abstract

As more pretreatment imaging becomes integrated into the treatment planning process and full three‐dimensional image‐guidance becomes part of the treatment delivery the need for a deformable image registration technique becomes more apparent. A novel finite element model‐based multi‐organ deformable image registration method, MORFEUS, has been developed. The basis of this method is twofold: first, individual organ deformation can be accurately modeled by deforming the surface of the organ at one instance into the surface of the organ at another instance and assigning the material properties that allow the internal structures to be accurately deformed into the secondary position and second, multi‐organ deformable alignment can be achieved by explicitly defining the deformation of a subset of organs and assigning surface interfaces between organs. The feasibility and accuracy of the method was tested on MR thoracic and abdominal images of healthy volunteers at inhale and exhale. For the thoracic cases, the lungs and external surface were explicitly deformed and the breasts were implicitly deformed based on its relation to the lung and external surface. For the abdominal cases, the liver, spleen, and external surface were explicitly deformed and the stomach and kidneys were implicitly deformed. The average accuracy (average absolute error) of the lung and liver deformation, determined by tracking visible bifurcations, was 0.19 (s.d.: 0.09), 0.28 (s.d.: 0.12) and , in the LR, AP, and IS directions, respectively. The average accuracy of implicitly deformed organs was 0.11 (s.d.: 0.11), 0.13 (s.d.: 0.12), and , in the LR, AP, and IS directions, respectively. The average vector magnitude of the accuracy was for the lung and liver deformation and for the implicitly deformed organs. The two main processes, explicit deformation of the selected organs and finite element analysis calculations, require less than 120 and , respectively. This platform can facilitate the integration of deformable image registration into online image guidance procedures, dose calculations, and tissue response monitoring as well as performing multi‐modality image registration for purposes of treatment planning.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1118/1.1915012

Cites

34 of 34 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 34 references

Cited by

See all 375

Metadata

Authors
Brock, K. K., Sharpe, M. B., Dawson, L. A., Kim, S. M., & Jaffray, D. A.
Venue
Medical Physics
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2005-05-20
Volume
32
Issue
6Part1
Pages
1647-1659
ISSN
  • 0094-2405 (ISSN-L)
  • 2473-4209
OpenAlex
W2098533585
Cited by
375
References
34
FWCI
25.93
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Accuracy of finite element model‐based multi‐organ deformable image registration. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1118/1.1915012
The paper
Brock, K. K., Sharpe, M. B., Dawson, L. A., Kim, S. M., & Jaffray, D. A. (2005). Accuracy of finite element model‐based multi‐organ deformable image registration. Medical Physics. https://doi.org/10.1118/1.1915012

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.