The DOI matches its Crossref record; 18 of the 18 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Attenuation, scattering, and absorption of ultrasound in the skull bone
Abstract
PURPOSE: Measured values of ultrasound attenuation in bone represent a combination of different loss mechanisms. As a wave is transmitted from a fluid into bone, reflections occur at the interface. In the bone, mode conversion occurs between longitudinal and shear modes and the mechanical wave is scattered by its complex internal microstructure. Finally, part of the wave energy is absorbed by the bone and converted into heat. Due to the complexity of the wave propagation and the difficulty in performing measurements that are capable of separating the various loss mechanisms, there are currently no estimates of the absorption in bone. The aim of this paper is, thus, to quantify the attenuation, scattering, and thermal absorption in bone. METHODS: An attenuating model of wave propagation in bone is established and used to develop a three-dimensional finite difference time domain numerical algorithm. Hydrophone and optical heterodyne interferometer measurements of the acoustic field as well as a x-ray microtomography of the bone sample are used to drive the simulations and to measure the attenuation. The acoustic measurements are performed concurrently with an infrared camera that can measure the temperature elevation during insonication. A link between the temperature and the absorption via a three-dimensional thermal simulation is then used to quantify the absorption coefficients for longitudinal and shear waves in cortical bone. RESULTS: We demonstrate that only a small part of the attenuation is due to absorption in bone and that the majority of the attenuation is due to reflection, scattering, and mode conversion. In the nine samples of a human used for the study, the absorption time constant for cortical bone was determined to be 1.04 μs ± 28%. This corresponds to a longitudinal absorption of 2.7 dB/cm and a shear absorption of 5.4 dB/cm. The experimentally measured attenuation across the approximately 8 mm thick samples was 13.3 ± 0.97 dB/cm. CONCLUSIONS: This first measurement of ultrasound absorption in bone can be used to estimate the amount of heat deposition based on knowledge of the acoustic field.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A high-performance, portable implementation of the MPI message passing interface standard
Gropp, W., Lusk, E., Doss, N., & Skjellum, A. (1996) · Parallel Computing · doi:10.1016/0167-8191(96)00024-5 · Cited by 2,222
Physical properties of tissue : a comprehensive reference book
Duck, F. A. (1990) · Cited by 1,675
Bauer, D. C. (1997) · Archives of Internal Medicine · doi:10.1001/archinte.1997.00440270067006 · Cited by 800
A NEW METHOD FOR THE GENERATION AND USE OF FOCUSED ULTRASOUND IN EXPERIMENTAL BIOLOGY
Lynn, J. G., Zwemer, R. L., Chick, A. J., & Miller, A. E. (1942) · Journal of General Physiology · doi:10.1085/jgp.26.2.179 · Cited by 690
Aubry, J.-F., Tanter, M., Pernot, M., Thomas, J.-L., & Fink, M. (2003) · The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · doi:10.1121/1.1529663 · Cited by 581
Self-citationLabiche, J.-C., Mathon, O., Pascarelli, S., Newton, M. A., Ferre, G. G., Curfs, C., Vaughan, G., Homs, A., & Carreiras, D. F. (2007) · Review of Scientific Instruments · doi:10.1063/1.2783112 · Cited by 394
Hynynen, K., Clement, G. T., McDannold, N., Vykhodtseva, N., King, R., White, P. J., Vitek, S., & Jolesz, F. A. (2004) · Magnetic Resonance in Medicine · doi:10.1002/mrm.20118 · Cited by 340
Thomas, J.-L., & Fink, M. A. (1996) · IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control · doi:10.1109/58.542055 · Cited by 312
Longitudinal and shear mode ultrasound propagation in human skull bone
White, P. J., Clement, G. T., & Hynynen, K. (2006) · Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology · doi:10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2006.03.015 · Cited by 288
A model for longitudinal and shear wave propagation in viscoelastic media
Szabo, T. L., & Wu, J. (2000) · The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · doi:10.1121/1.428630 · Cited by 274
Cited by
Krishna, V., Sammartino, F., & Rezai, A. (2018) · JAMA Neurology · doi:10.1001/jamaneurol.2017.3129 · Cited by 289
Focused ultrasound for neuromodulation
Darrow, D. P. (2019) · Neurotherapeutics · doi:10.1007/s13311-018-00691-3 · Cited by 190
The Future of Neuroimplantable Devices: A Materials Science and Regulatory Perspective
Obidin, N., Tasnim, F., & Dagdeviren, C. (2020) · Advanced Materials · doi:10.1002/adma.201901482 · Cited by 126
A Basal Forebrain-Cingulate Circuit in Macaques Decides It Is Time to Act
Khalighinejad, N., Bongioanni, A., Verhagen, L., Folloni, D., Attali, D., Aubry, J.-F., Sallet, J., & Rushworth, M. F. S. (2020) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2019.10.030 · Cited by 90
Self-citationBae, S., Liu, K., Pouliopoulos, A. N., Ji, R., Jiménez-Gambín, S., Yousefian, O., Kline-Schoder, A. R., Batts, A. J., Tsitsos, F. N., Kokossis, D., et al. (2024) · Theranostics · doi:10.7150/thno.94206 · Cited by 70
Metadata
- Authors
- Pinton, G., Aubry, J.-F., Bossy, E., Muller, M., Pernot, M., & Tanter, M.
- Venue
- Medical Physics
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2011-12-21
- Volume
- 39
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 299-307
- ISSN
- 0094-2405 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1988950556
- Cited by
- 405
- References
- 18
- FWCI
- 10.62
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Attenuation, scattering, and absorption of ultrasound in the skull bone. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1118/1.3668316
- The paper
- Pinton, G., Aubry, J.-F., Bossy, E., Muller, M., Pernot, M., & Tanter, M. (2011). Attenuation, scattering, and absorption of ultrasound in the skull bone. Medical Physics. https://doi.org/10.1118/1.3668316
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.