The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Native Italian speakers’ perception and production of English vowels
Abstract
This study examined the production and perception of English vowels by highly experienced native Italian speakers of English. The subjects were selected on the basis of the age at which they arrived in Canada and began to learn English, and how much they continued to use Italian. Vowel production accuracy was assessed through an intelligibility test in which native English-speaking listeners attempted to identify vowels spoken by the native Italian subjects. Vowel perception was assessed using a categorial discrimination test. The later in life the native Italian subjects began to learn English, the less accurately they produced and perceived English vowels. Neither of two groups of early Italian/English bilinguals differed significantly from native speakers of English either for production or perception. This finding is consistent with the hypothesis of the speech learning model [Flege, in Speech Perception and Linguistic Experience: Theoretical and Methodological Issues (York, Timonium, MD, 1995)] that early bilinguals establish new categories for vowels found in the second language (L2). The significant correlation observed to exist between the measures of L2 vowel production and perception is consistent with another hypothesis of the speech learning model, viz., that the accuracy with which L2 vowels are produced is limited by how accurately they are perceived.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Neurolinguists, beware! The bilingual is not two monolinguals in one person.
Grosjean, F. (1989) · Brain and Language · doi:10.1016/0093-934x(89)90048-5 · Cited by 1,490
Flege, J. E. (1987) · Journal of Phonetics · doi:10.1016/s0095-4470(19)30537-6 · Cited by 1,148
Self-citationAuditory perception by normal Japanese adults of the sounds “L” and “R”
Goto, H. (1971) · Neuropsychologia · doi:10.1016/0028-3932(71)90027-3 · Cited by 620
FOREIGN ACCENTS, LANGUAGE ACQUISITION, AND CEREBRAL DOMINANCE 1
Scovel, T. (1969) · Language Learning · doi:10.1111/j.1467-1770.1969.tb00466.x · Cited by 258
Mack, M. (1989) · Perception & Psychophysics · doi:10.3758/bf03204982 · Cited by 128
Cited by
How the Timing and Quality of Early Experiences Influence the Development of Brain Architecture
Fox, S. E., Levitt, P., & Nelson, C. A. (2010) · Child Development · doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.2009.01380.x · Cited by 1,088
Costa, A., & Santesteban, M. (2004) · Journal of Memory and Language · doi:10.1016/j.jml.2004.02.002 · Cited by 1,027
Age constraints on second-language acquisition
Flege, J. E., Yeni-Komshian, G. H., & Liu, S. (1999) · Journal of Memory and Language · doi:10.1006/jmla.1999.2638 · Cited by 989
Self-citationAssessing bilingual dominance.
FLEGE, J. E., MACKAY, I. R. A., & PISKE, T. (2002) · Applied Psycholinguistics · doi:10.1017/s0142716402004046 · Cited by 304
Self-citationAge of first bilingual language exposure as a new window into bilingual reading development
KOVELMAN, I., BAKER, S. A., & PETITTO, L.-A. (2008) · Bilingualism: Language and Cognition · doi:10.1017/s1366728908003386 · Cited by 221
Development of the Human Cortex and the Concept of “Critical” or “Sensitive” Periods
Uylings, H. B. M. (2006) · Language Learning · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9922.2006.00355.x · Cited by 189
Amengual, M. (2016) · International Journal of Bilingualism · doi:10.1177/1367006914544988 · Cited by 75
Gorba, C., & Cebrian, J. (2021) · Journal of Phonetics · doi:10.1016/j.wocn.2021.101094 · Cited by 24
Metadata
- Authors
- Flege, J. E., MacKay, I. R. A., & Meador, D.
- Venue
- The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
- Publisher
- Acoustical Society of America (ASA)
- Published
- 1999-11-01
- Volume
- 106
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 2973-2987
- ISSN
- 0001-4966 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-8524
- OpenAlex
- W2170671382
- Cited by
- 476
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 6.88
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.