CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 122Sports, Gender, and SocietyGender, Feminism, and MediaMedia, Gender, and Advertising

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 52 of the 52 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Sporting Women and Social Media: Sexualization, Misogyny, and Gender-Based Violence in Online Spaces

Open access
Kavanagh, Emma, Litchfield, Chelsea, Osborne, Jaquelyn·2019·International Journal of Sport Communication
DOI 10.1123/ijsc.2019-0079
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

This study investigated gender-based violence targeting high-profile women in virtual environments through the case of women’s tennis. Using a netnographic approach and the lens of third-wave feminism, 2 popular social media platforms (Facebook and Twitter) were analyzed to examine social commentary and fan interaction surrounding the top-5-seeded female tennis players during the Wimbledon Tennis Championships. Athletes were exposed to violent interactions in a number of ways. Four themes were identified through data analysis: threats of physical violence, sexualization that focused on the female physical appearance, sexualization that expressed desire and/or proposed physical or sexual contact, and sexualization that was vile, explicit, and threateningly violent in a sexual or misogynistic manner. Findings demonstrate how social media provides a space for unregulated gender-based cyberhate targeting high-profile women in their workplace in a way that traditional sport media does not.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1123/ijsc.2019-0079

Cites

52 of 52 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 52 references

Research works printed but not linked: 52

  1. Gatto, 2018, Simona Halep breast reduction was her biggest sacrifice, Tennis World USA
  2. Lebel, 2012, How tweet it is: A gendered analysis of professional tennis players’ self-presentation on Twitter, International Journal of Sport Communication,, 5,, 461, 10.1123/ijsc.5.4.461 · DOI
  3. Ward, 2015, Heather Watson: I won’t let death threats wreck my chances at Wimbledon, The Telegraph
  4. Jane, 2012, ‘You’re a ugly, whorish, slut.’ Understanding E-bile, Feminist Media Studies,, 14, 531, 10.1080/14680777.2012.741073 · DOI
  5. Gatto, 2018, Simona Halep breast reduction was her biggest sacrifice, Tennis World USA
  6. Litchfield, 2018, Social media and the politics of gender, race and identity: The case of Serena Williams, European Journal for Sport and Society,, 15, 154, 10.1080/16138171.2018.1452870 · DOI
  7. Rodríguez-Dariasa, 2018, Gender-based harassment in cyberspace. The case of Pikara magazine, Women’s Studies International Forum,, 66,, 63, 10.1016/j.wsif.2017.10.004 · DOI
  8. Moloney, 2018, Assessing online misogyny: Perspectives from sociology and feminist media studies, Sociology Compass,, 12, e12577, 10.1111/soc4.12577 · DOI
  9. Sanderson, 2013, From loving the hero to despising the villain: Sports fans, Facebook and social identity threats, Mass Communication and Society,, 16, 487, 10.1080/15205436.2012.730650 · DOI
  10. Citron, 2014, Hate crimes in cyberspace, 10.4159/harvard.9780674735613 · DOI
  11. Litchfield, 2016, Virtual maltreatment: Sexualisation and social media abuse in sport, Psychology of Women’s Section Review,, 18, 36, 10.53841/bpspow.2016.18.2.36 · DOI
  12. Litchfield, 2018, Female athletes, Olympic and non-Olympic online sports coverage in Australia, International Journal of Sport and Society,, 9, 35, 10.18848/2152-7857/CGP/v09i03/35-51 · DOI
  13. Baumgardner, 2010, Manifesta: Young women, feminism and the future
  14. Myers, 2016, Watch an emotional Paige Spiranac speak out about the cyber bullying she’s faced, Golf Digest
  15. Jane, 2017, Theorizing digital divides, 158
  16. Reid, 2018, A netnographic sensibility: Developing the netnographic boundaries/social listening boundaries, Journal of Marketing Management,, 34,, 263, 10.1080/0267257X.2018.1450282 · DOI
  17. Reichart Smith, 2015, I’m going to Instagram it! An analysis of athlete self-presentation on Instagram, Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media,, 59,, 342, 10.1080/08838151.2015.1029125 · DOI
  18. Litchfield, 2015, Women in the sports pages: A brief insight into Olympic and non-Olympic years in Australia, International Journal of Sport and Society,, 4, 45, 10.18848/2152-7857/CGP/v04i04/53986 · DOI
  19. Toffoletti, 2018, Female athletes’ self-representation on social media: A feminist analysis of neoliberal marketing strategies in “economies of visibility.”, Feminism & Psychology,, 28, 11, 10.1177/0959353517726705 · DOI
  20. Kavanagh, 2014, Researching and enhancing athlete welfare, 34
  21. Jane, 2016, Misogyny online. A short (and brutish) history
  22. Cooky, 2015, ‘It’s dude time!’ A quarter century of excluding women’s sports in televised news and highlights shows, Communication & Sport,, 3, 261, 10.1177/2167479515588761 · DOI
  23. Kassing, 2010, Fan–athlete interaction and Twitter tweeting through the Giro: A case study, International Journal of Sport Communication,, 3,, 113, 10.1123/ijsc.3.1.113 · DOI
  24. Browning, 2012, The positives and negatives of Twitter: Exploring how student athletes use Twitter and respond to critical tweets, International Journal of Sport Communication,, 5,, 503, 10.1123/ijsc.5.4.503 · DOI
  25. Braun, 2006, Using thematic analysis in psychology, Qualitative Research in Psychology,, 3,, 77, 10.1191/1478088706qp063oa · DOI · Paper page
  26. Veletsianos, 2018, Women scholars’ experiences with online harassment and abuse: Self-protection, resistance, acceptance, and self-blame, New Media and Society,, 20,, 4689, 10.1177/1461444818781324 · DOI · Paper page
  27. Ward, 2015, Heather Watson: I won’t let death threats wreck my chances at Wimbledon, The Telegraph
  28. Kavanagh, 2014, Researching and enhancing athlete welfare, 34
  29. Ging, 2018, Special issue on online misogyny, Feminist Media Studies,, 18, 515, 10.1080/14680777.2018.1447345 · DOI · Paper page
  30. Heywood, 2006, The women’s movement today: An encyclopedia of third-wave feminism
  31. Mantilla, 2015, Gendertrolling: How misogyny went viral, 10.5040/9798400656026 · DOI · Paper page
  32. Megarry, 2014, Online incivility or sexual harasssment: Conceptualising women’s experiences in the digital age., Women’s Studies International Forum,, 47,, 46, 10.1016/j.wsif.2014.07.012 · DOI · Paper page
  33. Jane, 2018, Gendered cyberhate as workplace harassment and economic vandalism, Feminist Media Studies,, 18,, 575, 10.1080/14680777.2018.1447344 · DOI
  34. Kozinets, 2006, Click to connect: Netnography and tribal advertising, Journal of Advertising Research,, 46,, 279, 10.2501/S0021849906060338 · DOI
  35. Sanderson, 2014, “I hate you man!” Exploring maladaptive parasocial interaction expressions to college athletes via Twitter, Journal of Issues in Intercollegiate Athletics,, 7,, 333
  36. Myers, 2016, Watch an emotional Paige Spiranac speak out about the cyber bullying she’s faced, Golf Digest
  37. Richardson-Self, 2018, Women-hating: On misogyny, sexism, and hate speech, Hypatia,, 33,, 256, 10.1111/hypa.12398 · DOI
  38. Sunden, 2018, Shameless hags and tolerance whores: Feminist resistance and the affective circuits of online hate, Feminist Media Studies,, 14, 643, 10.1080/14680777.2018.1447427 · DOI
  39. Hambrick, 2010, Understanding professional athletes’ use of Twitter: A content analysis of athlete tweets, International Journal of Sport Communication,, 3, 454, 10.1123/ijsc.3.4.454 · DOI
  40. Litchfield, 2019, Twitter, Team GB and the Australian Olympic Team: Representations of gender in social media spaces, Sport in Society: Cultures, Commerce, Media, Politics,, 22, 1148, 10.1080/17430437.2018.1504775 · DOI
  41. Bruce, 2016, New rules for new times: Sportswomen and media representation in the third wave, Sex Roles,, 74,, 361, 10.1007/s11199-015-0497-6 · DOI
  42. Pegoraro, 2017, #SheBelieves: The use of Instagram to frame the US women’s soccer team during #FIFAWWC, Sport in Society,, 21,, 1063, 10.1080/17430437.2017.1310198 · DOI
  43. Henry, 2018, Technology-facilitated sexual violence: A literature review of empirical research, Trauma, Violence and Abuse,, 19, 195, 10.1177/1524838016650189 · DOI · Paper page
  44. Bennett, 2011, College students’ electronic victimization in friendships and dating relationships: Anticipated distress and associations with risky behaviors, Violence and Victims,, 26,, 410, 10.1891/0886-6708.26.4.410 · DOI
  45. Cole, 2015, “It’s like she’s eager to be verbally abused”: Twitter, trolls, and (en)gendering disciplinary rhetoric, Feminist Media Studies,, 15, 356, 10.1080/14680777.2015.1008750 · DOI
  46. Kavanagh, 2016, Towards typologies of virtual maltreatment: Sport, digital cultures and dark leisure, Leisure Studies,, 35,, 783, 10.1080/02614367.2016.1216581 · DOI
  47. Vickery, 2018, Mediating misogyny: Gender, technology, and harassment, 10.1007/978-3-319-72917-6 · DOI
  48. Lockyer, 2019, Rape jokes aren’t funny: The mainstreaming of rape jokes in contemporary newspaper discourse, Feminist Media Studies
  49. Hughes, 2012, A tale of two sites: Twitter vs. Facebook and the personality predictors of social media usage, Computers in Human Behavior,, 28, 561, 10.1016/j.chb.2011.11.001 · DOI · Paper page
  50. Reyns, 2011, Being pursued online: Applying cyber-lifestyle-routine activities theory to cyber-stalking victimisation, Criminal Justice and Behaviour,, 38,, 1149, 10.1177/0093854811421448 · DOI
  51. Frederick, 2012, Why we follow: An examination of parasocial interaction and fan motivations for following athlete archetypes on Twitter, International Journal of Sport Communication,, 5,, 481, 10.1123/ijsc.5.4.481 · DOI
  52. Jane, 2014, ‘Back to the kitchen, cunt’: Speaking the unspeakable about online misogyny, Continuum: Journal of Media & Cultural Studies,, 28, 558, 10.1080/10304312.2014.924479 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–122 of 122

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Kavanagh, E., Litchfield, C., & Osborne, J.
Affiliations
  • Bournemouth University (GB)
  • Charles Sturt University (AU)
ORCID
Venue
International Journal of Sport Communication
Publisher
Human Kinetics
Published
2019-12-01
Volume
12
Issue
4
Pages
552-572
ISSN
  • 1936-3907 (ISSN-L)
  • 1936-3915
DOI
10.1123/ijsc.2019-0079
OpenAlex
W2995590669
Cited by
113
References
52
Citations by year
2026: 22 · 2025: 22 · 2024: 26 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 3
FWCI
12.67
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
public-domain
Locations
  • International Journal of Sport Communication (publishedVersion)
  • Bournemouth University Research Online (Bournemouth University) (acceptedVersion, public-domain)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Sports, Gender, and Society
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender, Feminism, and Media
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Media, Gender, and Advertising
Keywords
gender-based violence, sexualization, misogyny, women's tennis, social media, cyberhate, Wimbledon, third-wave feminism, online harassment, Facebook, Twitter, fan interaction, workplace harassment

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review