Cited by 37Body Composition Measurement TechniquesSports Performance and TrainingPhysical Education and Training Studies

Body Composition Profiles of Elite American Heptathletes

Houtkooper, Linda B., Mullins, Veronica A., Going, Scott B., Brown, C. Harmon, Lohman, Timothy G.·2001·International Journal of Sport Nutrition and Exercise Metabolism

Abstract

This study characterized body composition profiles of elite American heptathletes and cross-validated skinfold (SKF) and bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) field method equations for estimation of percent body fat (%Fat) using dual energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) as the criterion. Weight, height, fat mass (FM), fat-free mass (FFM), bone mineral density (BMD), and %Fat were measured in 19 heptathletes using standard measurement protocols for DXA, SKFs and BIA. The ages, heights, and weights were respectively 25.5 +/- 3.5 years, 175.0 +/- 6.6 cm, 67.3 +/- 7.1 kg. DXA estimates of mean +/- SD values for body composition variables were 57.2 +/- 6.1 kg FFM, 10.1 +/- 2.6 kg FM, 114 +/- 7% BMD for age/racial reference group, and 15 +/- 3.0 %Fat. Ranges of bias values for %Fat (DXA minus SKF or BIA) were, respectively, -0.5 to 1.6% and -5.5 to -1.2%. Ranges for standard errors of estimate and total errors were, respectively, SKF 2.4-2.5%, 2.4 - 2.8% and BIA 3.0%, 5.0-6.5%. Regression analyses of the field methods on DXA were significant (p < .05) for all SKF equations but not BIA equations. This study demonstrates that elite American heptathletes are lean, have high levels of BMD, and that SKF equations provide more accurate estimates of %Fat relative to DXA than estimates from BIA equations.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1123/ijsnem.11.2.162

Cites

39 of 39 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 40 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Houtkooper, L. B., Mullins, V. A., Going, S. B., Brown, C. H., & Lohman, T. G.
Affiliations
University of Arizona (US)
Venue
International Journal of Sport Nutrition and Exercise Metabolism
Published
2001-06
Volume
11
Issue
2
Pages
162-173
ISSN
  • 1526-484X (ISSN-L)
  • 1543-2742
OpenAlex
W191858536
Cited by
37
References
40
Citations by year
2025: 4 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 2
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • International Journal of Sport Nutrition and Exercise Metabolism (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Body Composition Measurement Techniques
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Orthopedics and Sports Medicine › Sports Performance and Training
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation › Physical Education and Training Studies
Keywords
body composition, heptathlon, elite athletes, skinfold thickness, bioelectrical impedance analysis, body fat percentage, fat-free mass, fat mass, bone mineral density, dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry, cross-validation
MeSH terms
Adipose Tissue, Adult, Body Composition, Female, Humans, Sensitivity and Specificity, Skinfold Thickness, Sports, Reproducibility of Results, Absorptiometry, Photon, Bone Density, Electric Impedance, Muscle, Skeletal

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review