Cited by 62Eating Disorders and BehaviorsLower Extremity Biomechanics and PathologiesNutrition, Health and Food Behavior

Female Recreational Exercisers at Risk for Low Energy Availability

Slater, Joanne, McLay-Cooke, Rebecca, Brown, Rachel, Black, Katherine·2016·International Journal of Sport Nutrition and Exercise Metabolism

Abstract

Low energy availability (LEA) describes the disruption in normal physiological function existent when insufficient energy intake is combined with exercise. To conserve energy a range of endocrine adaptations occur, impairing health and athletic performance. The prevalence of LEA has not been fully established especially among recreational exercisers. Determining recreational exercisers at risk of LEA may help to maximize prevention, early diagnosis and treatment. The design of this study was a cross-sectional online survey. One-hundred and nine female recreational exercisers, with a mean age of 23.8 (SD 6.9) years were recruited via gyms and fitness centers throughout NZ. Participants completed an online questionnaire including questions from the LEAF-Q (Low Energy Availability in Females Questionnaire). A total of 45.0% (CI, 35.4%, 54.8%) of participants were classified as “at risk“ of LEA. For every extra hour of exercise per week the odds of being at risk of LEA were 1.13 times greater (CI 1.02, 1.25, p = .016). All participants reporting previous stress fracture injuries (n = 4) were classified as at risk for LEA. Significantly more subjects participating in an individual sport were classified as at risk for LEA (69.6%, CI 24.3%, 54.8%) compared with team sports (34.8%, CI 18.7%, 40.5%) (p = .006). The high prevalence of female recreational exercisers at risk of LEA is of concern, emphasizing the importance of increasing awareness of the issue, and promoting prevention and early detection strategies, so treatment can be implemented before health is severely compromised.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1123/ijsnem.2015-0245

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Slater, J., McLay-Cooke, R., Brown, R., & Black, K.
Corresponding author
Black, Katherine
Venue
International Journal of Sport Nutrition and Exercise Metabolism
Published
2016-10
Volume
26
Issue
5
Pages
421-427
ISSN
  • 1526-484X (ISSN-L)
  • 1543-2742
OpenAlex
W2419217859
Cited by
62
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 4
FWCI
7.13
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • International Journal of Sport Nutrition and Exercise Metabolism (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Pennington Biomedical Research Foundation
  • University of Otago
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Eating Disorders and Behaviors
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Lower Extremity Biomechanics and Pathologies
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Nutrition, Health and Food Behavior
Keywords
low energy availability, exercise stress, energy intake, LEAF-Q, stress fractures, individual sports, team sports, exercise volume, endocrine adaptation, early detection and prevention
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Energy Intake, Cross-Sectional Studies, Female, Humans, New Zealand, Surveys and Questionnaires, Risk Factors, Exercise, Fractures, Stress, Malnutrition, Athletic Performance, Young Adult, Athletes, Sports Nutritional Physiological Phenomena

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review