Cited by 160Sports Performance and TrainingSex and Gender in HealthcareSports, Gender, and Society

Sex Differences in World-Record Performance: The Influence of Sport Discipline and Competition Duration

Open access
Sandbakk, Øyvind, Solli, Guro Strøm, Holmberg, Hans-Christer·2018·International Journal of Sports Physiology and Performance

Abstract

The current review summarizes scientific knowledge concerning sex differences in world-record performance and the influence of sport discipline and competition duration. In addition, the way that physiological factors relate to sex dimorphism is discussed. While cultural factors played a major role in the rapid improvement of performance of women relative to men up until the 1990s, sex differences between the world’s best athletes in most events have remained relatively stable at approximately 8–12%. The exceptions are events in which upper-body power is a major contributor, where this difference is more than 12%, and ultraendurance swimming, where the gap is now less than 5%. The physiological advantages in men include a larger body size with more skeletal-muscle mass, a lower percentage of body fat, and greater maximal delivery of anaerobic and aerobic energy. The greater strength and anaerobic capacity in men normally disappear when normalized for fat-free body mass, whereas the higher hemoglobin concentrations lead to 5–10% greater maximal oxygen uptake in men with such normalization. The higher percentage of muscle mass in the upper body of men results in a particularly large sex difference in power production during upper-body exercise. While the exercise efficiency of men and women is usually similar, women have a better capacity to metabolize fat and demonstrate better hydrodynamics and more even pacing, which may be advantageous, in particular during long-lasting swimming competitions.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1123/ijspp.2017-0196

Cites

50 of 50 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sandbakk, Ø., Solli, G. S., & Holmberg, H.-C.
Corresponding author
Sandbakk, Øyvind
Venue
International Journal of Sports Physiology and Performance
Published
2018-01-01
Volume
13
Issue
1
Pages
2-8
ISSN
  • 1555-0265 (ISSN-L)
  • 1555-0273
OpenAlex
W2613904121
Cited by
160
References
50
Citations by year
2026: 19 · 2025: 28 · 2024: 19 · 2023: 25 · 2022: 22 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 1
FWCI
1.64
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
other-oa
Locations
  • International Journal of Sports Physiology and Performance (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • NORA - Norwegian Open Research Archives (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Orthopedics and Sports Medicine › Sports Performance and Training
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Sex and Gender in Healthcare
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Sports, Gender, and Society
Keywords
sex differences, sports disciplines, sexual dimorphism, upper body power, fat-free mass, hemoglobin, VO2max, anaerobic capacity, fat metabolism, hydrodynamics, pacing
MeSH terms
Competitive Behavior, Efficiency, Energy Metabolism, Female, Humans, Male, Physical Endurance, Sex Characteristics, Sex Factors, Sports, Swimming, Body Size, Body Fat Distribution, Muscle Strength, Hydrodynamics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review