Cited by 33Body Composition Measurement TechniquesThermoregulation and physiological responsesCardiovascular and exercise physiology

Stabilizing Bioimpedance-Vector-Analysis Measures With a 10-Minute Cold Shower After Running Exercise to Enable Assessment of Body Hydration

Open access
Campa, Francesco, Gatterer, Hannes, Lukaski, Henry, Toselli, Stefania·2019·International Journal of Sports Physiology and Performance

Abstract

Purpose: The exercise-induced increase in skin and body temperature, cutaneous blood flow, and electrolyte accumulation on the skin affects the validity of bioimpedance analysis to assess postexercise changes in hydration. This study aimed to assess the influence of a 10-min cold (22°C) shower on the time course of impedance measurements after controlled exercise. Methods: In total, 10 male athletes (age 26.2 [4.1] y and body mass index 23.9 [1.7] kg/m 2) were tested on 2 different days. During both trials, athletes ran for 30 min on a treadmill in a room at 23°C. In a randomized crossover trial, the participants underwent a 10-min cold shower on the trial occasion and did not shower in the control trial. Bioimpedance analysis variables were measured before running (ie, baseline [T0]), immediately after exercising (T1), and 20 (T2), 40 (T3), and 60 min (T4) after the exercise. The shower was performed after T1 in the shower trial. Results: Body weight decreased similarly in both trials (−0.4% [0.1%], P < .001; −0.4% [0.1%], P < .001). Resistance and vector length returned to baseline at T2 in the shower trial, whereas baseline values were achieved at T3 in the control trial (P > .05). In the control trial, reactance remained at a lower level for the entire testing period (38.1 [6.9] vs 37.3 [6.7], P < .001). Forehead skin temperature returned to baseline values at T2 with shower, whereas it was still high at T4 without shower (P < .001). Conclusions: The present data show that a 10-min cold shower enables the stabilization of bioimpedance analysis measurements within 20 min after exercise, which might facilitate the assessment of hydration change after exercise.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1123/ijspp.2018-0676

Cites

10 of 10 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Inconsistencies in methodological procedures for BIA may have impacted the final outcomes for each study.

    “inconsistencies in methodological procedures (e.g., the standardization of food and beverage intake before the assessment, electrode placement, skin cleansing) may have impacted the final outcomes for each study [108].”

    From High-standard predictive equations for estimating body composition using bioelectrical impedance analysis: a systematic review (2024) · cites this paper as [108]

    The Introduction and Discussion (pages unavailable) explain that skin temperature, blood flow, and electrolytes on the skin can affect BIA readings; the study also found that a standardized cold shower changed how quickly readings stabilized. This supports the general concern that assessment conditions may affect outcomes, but the paper does not establish effects of differences in food or beverage intake, electrode placement, or skin cleansing across the studies cited. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Campa, F., Gatterer, H., Lukaski, H., & Toselli, S.
Affiliations
  • University of Bologna (IT)
  • Eurac Research (IT)
  • University of North Dakota (US)
Corresponding author
Gatterer, Hannes
Venue
International Journal of Sports Physiology and Performance
Published
2019-08-01
Volume
14
Issue
7
Pages
1006-1009
ISSN
  • 1555-0265 (ISSN-L)
  • 1555-0273
OpenAlex
W2911688260
Cited by
33
References
10
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 4
FWCI
3.25
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • International Journal of Sports Physiology and Performance (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Archivio istituzionale della ricerca (Alma Mater Studiorum Università di Bologna) (submittedVersion)
  • Open Research (University of Surrey) (submittedVersion)
  • Padua Research Archive (University of Padova) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Body Composition Measurement Techniques
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Thermoregulation and physiological responses
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Complementary and alternative medicine › Cardiovascular and exercise physiology
Keywords
bioelectrical impedance analysis, body hydration, cold showers, running, skin temperature, vector length, reactance, athletes
MeSH terms
Organism Hydration Status, Adult, Baths, Cold Temperature, Humans, Male, Running, Skin Temperature, Electric Impedance, Cross-Over Studies, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review