Cited by 4Sport Psychology and PerformanceMindfulness and Compassion InterventionsPsychological Treatments and Assessments

Mindfulness and psychological inflexibility in portuguese adolescent athletes: a novel framework for understanding the link between shame and sports anxiety

Open access
de Oliveira, Sara Margarida Simões, Cunha, Marina Isabel Vieira Antunes, Rosado, António Fernando Boleto, Saraiva, Mariana, Ferreira, Cláudia Rute Carlos·2025·Journal of Clinical Sport Psychology

Abstract

This study aimed to test a comprehensive model in adolescent athletes that explores the effect of shame on sports anxiety and whether psychological inflexibility and mindfulness influence this association. The sample study included 210 young Portuguese athletes from different competitive sports. The path analysis results confirmed the adequacy of the proposed model, which explained 49% of the variance in sports anxiety. Results demonstrated that athletes who experienced higher levels of shame tended to exhibit elevated levels of sports anxiety through lower levels of mindfulness and higher psychological inflexibility. The study offers new empirical data that may be relevant for clinical and sport psychology practitioners. These findings seem to underline the importance of addressing shame and, consequently, sports anxiety in adolescent athletes by developing greater psychological flexibility and, inherently, more mindfulness skills among adolescent athletes who are in a phase of their lives where sport can play a crucial role.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1123/jcsp.2023-0041

Cites

75 of 75 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 10

  1. [7]7. Brown, K.W., Ryan, R.M., & Creswell, D.J. (2007). Mindfulness: Theoretical foundations for its salutary effects. Psychological Inquiry, 18, 211-237. https://doi.org/10.1080/ 10478400701598298
  2. [9]9. Byrne, B.M. (2010). Structural equation modeling with AMOS: Basic concepts, applica- tions, and programming (2nd ed.). Taylor & Francis Group.
  3. [25]25. Fontana, M., & Fry, M. (2017). Creating and validating the shame in sport questionnaire. Journal of Sport Behavior, 40(3), 278-296.
  4. [40]40. Hayes, S.C., Strosahl, K.D., & Wilson, K.G. (2012). Acceptance and commitment therapy: The process and practice of mindful change. Guilford Press.
  5. [43]43. Hofmann, A.D. (1997). Adolescent growth and development. In A.D. Hofmann & D.E. Greydanus (Eds.), Adolescent medicine (3rd ed., pp. 11-22).
  6. [50]50. Kline, R. (2005). Principals and practice of structural equation modelling (2nd ed.). Guilford Press.
  7. [55]55. Luoma, J.B., & Hayes, S.C. (2003). Cognitive defusion. In W. O'Donahue, J.E. Fisher, & S.C. Hayes (Eds.), Empirically supported techniques of cognitive behavioral therapy: A step-by-step guide for clinicians. Wiley.
  8. [62]62. Oliveira, S., Coimbra, M., & Ferreira, C. (2019). How do athletes experience shame? The validation of a new measure of external and internal shame [Poster presentation]. ACBS World Conference 17, Dublin, Ireland.
  9. [67]67. Plisco, M.P, & Lyon, N. (2020). The effects of self-compassion and mindfulness on per- formance anxiety and flow in elite athletes. Journal of Sport Behavior, 43(4), 426-441.
  10. [79]79. Tangney, J.P., & Dearing, R.L. (2002). Shame and guilt. Guilford Press.

Cited by

Authors
de Oliveira, S. M. S., Cunha, M. I. V. A., Rosado, A. F. B., Saraiva, M., & Ferreira, C. R. C.
Affiliations
  • Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, CINEICC—Center for Research in Neuropsychology and Cognitive Behavioral Intervention, University of Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal
  • University of Coimbra (PT)
  • FMH—Faculty of Human Kinetics, University of Lisbon, Lisboa, Portugal
Venue
Journal of Clinical Sport Psychology
Published
2025-06-01
Volume
19
Issue
2
Pages
215-232
ISSN
  • 1932-9261 (ISSN-L)
  • 1932-927X
OpenAlex
W4398795426
Cited by
4
References
75
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2
FWCI
3.12
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Clinical Sport Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • Portuguese National Funding Agency for Science, Research and Technology (RCAAP Project by FCT) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia (SFRH/BD/143410/2019)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Sport Psychology and Performance
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychological Treatments and Assessments
Keywords
shame, competitive anxiety, mindfulness, psychological inflexibility, youth athletes, psychological flexibility, sport psychology intervention

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review