CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 106

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 21 of the 21 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Genome-wide data from two early Neolithic East Asian individuals dating to 7700 years ago

Siska, Veronika, Jones, Eppie Ruth, Jeon, Sungwon, Bhak, Youngjune, Kim, Hak-Min, Cho, Yun Sung, Kim, Hyunho, Lee, Kyusang, Veselovskaya, Elizaveta, Balueva, Tatiana, Gallego-Llorente, Marcos, Hofreiter, Michael, Bradley, Daniel G., Eriksson, Anders, Pinhasi, Ron, Bhak, Jong, Manica, Andrea·2017·Science Advances
DOI 10.1126/sciadv.1601877PMC PMC5287702
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Early Neolithic (~7700-year-old) genetic data from the Russian Far East implies a high level of genetic continuity in this region.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1126/sciadv.1601877

Cites

21 of 21 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Figures

Fig. 1 Regional reference panel, PCA, and ADMIXTURE analysis. (A) Map of Asia showing the location of Devil’s Gate (black triangle) and of modern populations forming the regional panel of our analysis. (B) Plot of the first two principal components as defined by our regional panel of modern populations from East Asia and central Asia shown on (A), with the two samples from Devil’s Gate (black triangles) projected upon them (18). (C) ADMIXTURE analysis (19) performed on Devil’s Gate and our regional panel, for K = 5 (lowest cross-validation error) and K = 8 (appearance of Devil’s Gate–specific cluster).
Fig. 1 Regional reference panel, PCA, and ADMIXTURE analysis. (A) Map of Asia showing the location of Devil’s Gate (black triangle) and of modern populations forming the regional panel of our analysis. (B) Plot of the first two principal components as defined by our regional panel of modern populations from East Asia and central Asia shown on (A), with the two samples from Devil’s Gate (black triangles) projected upon them (18). (C) ADMIXTURE analysis (19) performed on Devil’s Gate and our regional panel, for K = 5 (lowest cross-validation error) and K = 8 (appearance of Devil’s Gate–specific cluster).CC BY-NC · PubMed Central
Fig. 2 Outgroup f3 statistics. Outgroup f3 measuring shared drift between Devil’s Gate (black triangle shows sampling location) and modern populations with respect to an African outgroup (Khomani). (A) Map of the whole world. (B) Fifteen populations with the highest shared drift with Devil’s Gate, color-coded by regions as in Fig. 1. Error bars represent 1 SE.
Fig. 2 Outgroup f3 statistics. Outgroup f3 measuring shared drift between Devil’s Gate (black triangle shows sampling location) and modern populations with respect to an African outgroup (Khomani). (A) Map of the whole world. (B) Fifteen populations with the highest shared drift with Devil’s Gate, color-coded by regions as in Fig. 1. Error bars represent 1 SE.CC BY-NC · PubMed Central
Fig. 3 Spatial pattern of outgroup f3 statistics. Relationship between outgroup f3(X, Devil’s Gate; Khomani) and distance on land from Devil’s Gate using DevilsGate1 and all single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs). Populations up to 9000 km away from Devil’s Gate were considered when computing correlation. The highest distance considered was chosen to acquire the highest Pearson correlation in steps of 500 km. Best linear fit (r2 = 0.772, F1,108 = 368.4, P < 0.001) is shown as blue line, with 95% CI indicated by the shaded area.
Fig. 3 Spatial pattern of outgroup f3 statistics. Relationship between outgroup f3(X, Devil’s Gate; Khomani) and distance on land from Devil’s Gate using DevilsGate1 and all single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs). Populations up to 9000 km away from Devil’s Gate were considered when computing correlation. The highest distance considered was chosen to acquire the highest Pearson correlation in steps of 500 km. Best linear fit (r2 = 0.772, F1,108 = 368.4, P < 0.001) is shown as blue line, with 95% CI indicated by the shaded area.CC BY-NC · PubMed Central
Fig. 4 Admixture f3 statistics. Admixture f3 representing modern Koreans and Japanese as a mixture of two populations, X and Y, color-coded by regions as in Fig. 1. (A) Thirty pairs with the lowest f3 score for the Koreans as the target, out of those giving a significant (z < −2) value. (B) All four pairs giving a significantly (z < −2) negative score for the Japanese as the target. Error bars represent 1 SE.
Fig. 4 Admixture f3 statistics. Admixture f3 representing modern Koreans and Japanese as a mixture of two populations, X and Y, color-coded by regions as in Fig. 1. (A) Thirty pairs with the lowest f3 score for the Koreans as the target, out of those giving a significant (z < −2) value. (B) All four pairs giving a significantly (z < −2) negative score for the Japanese as the target. Error bars represent 1 SE.CC BY-NC · PubMed Central

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 21 references

Research works printed but not linked: 62

  1. 10.1038/srep31326 · DOI · Paper page
  2. 10.1126/science.1255832 · DOI · Paper page
  3. Y. Kuzmin, The Paleolithic-to-Neolithic transition and the origin of pottery production in the Russian Far East: A geoarchaeological approach. Archaeol. Ethnol. Anthropol. Eurasia 4, 16–26 (2003).
  4. 10.1017/S0003598X00062797 · DOI
  5. 10.1101/gr.2286304 · DOI
  6. 10.1101/gr.094052.109 · DOI · Paper page
  7. 10.1016/j.cub.2012.06.005 · DOI · Paper page
  8. K. Imamura Prehistoric Japan: New Perspectives on Insular East Asia (Univ. Hawaii Press 1996).
  9. 10.1266/ggs.90.147 · DOI
  10. 10.1038/jhg.2009.39 · DOI
  11. 10.1038/srep00355 · DOI
  12. 10.1038/jhg.2015.79 · DOI
  13. 10.1002/ajpa.20923 · DOI
  14. 10.1002/ajpa.21561 · DOI
  15. H. Kanzawa-Kiriyama, K. Kryukov, T. A. Jinam, K. Hosomichi, A. Saso, G. Suwa, S. Ueda, M. Yoneda, A. Tajima, K.-i. Shinoda, I. Inoue, N. Saitou, A partial nuclear genome of the Jomons who lived 3000 years ago in Fukushima, Japan. J. Hum. Genet. 10.1038/jhg.2016.110 (2016). · DOI · Paper page
  16. 10.1126/science.1177074 · DOI
  17. 10.1371/journal.pone.0004210 · DOI
  18. 10.1007/s00439-003-1019-0 · DOI
  19. 10.1186/gb-2012-13-9-248 · DOI · Paper page
  20. 10.1093/hmg/ddm355 · DOI · Paper page
  21. 10.1038/jhg.2012.60 · DOI
  22. 10.1172/JCI113875 · DOI
  23. 10.1002/(SICI)1096-8644(199804)105:4<539::AID-AJPA10>3.0.CO;2-1 · DOI
  24. 10.1101/pdb.prot5448 · DOI
  25. 10.14806/ej.17.1.200 · DOI · Paper page
  26. 10.1093/nar/gku699 · DOI
  27. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp324 · DOI · Paper page
  28. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp352 · DOI · Paper page
  29. 10.1101/gr.107524.110 · DOI · Paper page
  30. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btq033 · DOI · Paper page
  31. 10.1002/humu.22356 · DOI
  32. 10.1126/science.1253448 · DOI
  33. 10.1086/519795 · DOI · Paper page
  34. 10.1371/journal.pgen.1004353 · DOI
  35. 10.1126/science.1188021 · DOI · Paper page
  36. 10.1016/j.ajhg.2015.11.020 · DOI
  37. Z. V. Andreeva, V. Tatarnikov, Peshera “Chertovy Vorota v Primor’e”. Arheol. Otkrytiya 1973 Goda Cave Devils Gate Primorye 1973 Excav. Seas. Mosc., 180–181 (1974).
  38. I. S. Zhushchikhovskaya Archaeology of the Russian Far East: Essays in Stone Age Prehistory S. M. Nelson A. P. Derevianko Y. V. Kuzmin R. L. Bland Eds. (Archaeopress 2006) pp. 101–122.
  39. A. Kuznecov, The ancient settlement in a cave Devil’s Gate and some problems of the Neolithic of Primorye. Ross. Arheol. 2, 17–19 (2002).
  40. T. S. Balueva, Cranial samples from a Neolithic layer from Devil’s Gate Cave, Primorye. Vopr. Antropol. 58, 184–187 (1978).
  41. 10.1126/science.aad2879 · DOI · Paper page
  42. 10.1126/science.1236573 · DOI · Paper page
  43. 10.1038/nature05951 · DOI
  44. 10.1093/hmg/ddp003 · DOI · Paper page
  45. 10.1534/g3.113.007484 · DOI
  46. 10.1371/journal.pgen.1003912 · DOI
  47. 10.1073/pnas.1316513111 · DOI · Paper page
  48. 10.1186/1471-2148-13-150 · DOI
  49. 10.1007/s10038-007-0167-9 · DOI
  50. 10.1016/j.legalmed.2011.04.003 · DOI
  51. 10.1038/ejhg.2013.96 · DOI · Paper page
  52. 10.1007/s00439-008-0537-1 · DOI
  53. 10.1016/j.cell.2013.01.016 · DOI
  54. 10.1007/BF00197271 · DOI
  55. 10.1111/j.1469-1809.2009.00517.x · DOI
  56. 10.1093/carcin/22.6.913 · DOI
  57. 10.1016/S0140-6736(97)01029-5 · DOI
  58. 10.1111/j.1530-0277.2006.00258.x · DOI
  59. 10.2217/pgs.13.57 · DOI
  60. 10.1038/jid.2012.480 · DOI
  61. 10.1038/ng1733 · DOI
  62. 10.1038/ng.1019 · DOI

Cited by

See all 106

Metadata

Authors
Siska, V., Jones, E. R., Jeon, S., Bhak, Y., Kim, H.-M., Cho, Y. S., Kim, H., Lee, K., Veselovskaya, E., Balueva, T., Gallego-Llorente, M., Hofreiter, M., Bradley, D. G., Eriksson, A., Pinhasi, R., Bhak, J., & Manica, A.
Venue
Science Advances
Publisher
American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)
Published
2017-02-03
Volume
3
Issue
2
ISSN
2375-2548
DOI
10.1126/sciadv.1601877
PMC
PMC5287702
Cited by
106
References
21
Language
en
Funders
  • Gates Cambridge Trust (ID0EDGAK13284)
  • European Research Council (ID0E1SAK13285, ADNABIOARC (263441), ID0EU4AK13286, GeneFlow (310763), ID0E6NCK13845, Consolidator Grant 647787 ‘LocalAdaptation’, ID0EHTCK13846)
  • Ulsan National Institute of Science and Technology (ID0ECJBK13287, Research Fund (1.140113.01))
  • Civil-Military Technology Cooperation Program (ID0EEWBK13288, Research Fund (14-BR-SS-03), ID0ENBCK13289)
  • Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (ID0EGGCK13290, DTP)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Genome-wide data from two early Neolithic East Asian individuals dating to 7700 years ago. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1126/sciadv.1601877
The paper
Siska, V., Jones, E. R., Jeon, S., Bhak, Y., Kim, H.-M., Cho, Y. S., Kim, H., Lee, K., Veselovskaya, E., Balueva, T., Gallego-Llorente, M., Hofreiter, M., Bradley, D. G., Eriksson, A., Pinhasi, R., Bhak, J., & Manica, A. (2017). Genome-wide data from two early Neolithic East Asian individuals dating to 7700 years ago. Science Advances. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.1601877