Cited by 227RNA Interference and Gene DeliveryCRISPR and Genetic EngineeringNanoparticle-Based Drug Delivery

Blood-brain barrier–penetrating single CRISPR-Cas9 nanocapsules for effective and safe glioblastoma gene therapy

Open access
Zou, Yan, Sun, Xinhong, Yang, Qingshan, Zheng, Meng, Shimoni, Olga, Ruan, Weimin, Wang, Yibin, Zhang, Dongya +7 more·2022·Science Advances

Abstract

We designed a unique nanocapsule for efficient single CRISPR-Cas9 capsuling, noninvasive brain delivery and tumor cell targeting, demonstrating an effective and safe strategy for glioblastoma gene therapy. Our CRISPR-Cas9 nanocapsules can be simply fabricated by encapsulating the single Cas9/sgRNA complex within a glutathione-sensitive polymer shell incorporating a dual-action ligand that facilitates BBB penetration, tumor cell targeting, and Cas9/sgRNA selective release. Our encapsulating nanocapsules evidenced promising glioblastoma tissue targeting that led to high PLK1 gene editing efficiency in a brain tumor (up to 38.1%) with negligible (less than 0.5%) off-target gene editing in high-risk tissues. Treatment with nanocapsules extended median survival time (68 days versus 24 days in nonfunctional sgRNA-treated mice). Our new CRISPR-Cas9 delivery system thus addresses various delivery challenges to demonstrate safe and tumor-specific delivery of gene editing Cas9 ribonucleoprotein for improved glioblastoma treatment that may potentially be therapeutically useful in other brain diseases.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1126/sciadv.abm8011

Cites

15 of 15 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 45

  1. [2]B. P. Kleinstiver, V. Pattanayak, M. S. Prew, S. Q. Tsai, N. T. Nguyen, Z. Zheng, J. K. Joung, High-fidelity CRISPR–Cas9 nucleases with no detectable genome-wide off-target effects. Nature 529, 490– 495 (2016). 26735016 PMC4851738
  2. [3]H. Park, J. Oh, G. Shim, B. Cho, Y. Chang, S. Kim, S. Baek, H. Kim, J. Shin, H. Choi, J. Yoo, J. Kim, W. Jun, M. Lee, C. J. Lengner, Y.-K. Oh, J. Kim, In vivo neuronal gene editing via CRISPR–Cas9 amphiphilic nanocomplexes alleviates deficits in mouse models of Alzheimer’s disease. Nat. Neurosci. 22, 524– 528 (2019). 30858603
  3. [4]M. W. LaFleur, T. H. Nguyen, M. A. Coxe, K. B. Yates, J. D. Trombley, S. A. Weiss, F. D. Brown, J. E. Gillis, D. J. Coxe, J. G. Doench, W. N. Haining, A. H. Sharpe, A CRISPR-Cas9 delivery system for in vivo screening of genes in the immune system. Nat. Commun. 10, 1668 (2019). 30971695 PMC6458184
  4. [5]H. Yin, R. L. Kanasty, A. A. Eltoukhy, A. J. Vegas, J. R. Dorkin, D. G. Anderson, Non-viral vectors for gene-based therapy. Nat. Rev. Genet. 15, 541– 555 (2014). 25022906
  5. [6]E. P. Rybicki, CRISPR–Cas9 strikes out in cassava. Nat. Biotechnol. 37, 727– 728 (2019). 31197230
  6. [7]T. L. Roth, C. Puig-Saus, R. Yu, E. Shifrut, J. Carnevale, P. J. Li, J. Hiatt, J. Saco, P. Krystofinski, H. Li, V. Tobin, D. N. Nguyen, M. R. Lee, A. L. Putnam, A. L. Ferris, J. W. Chen, J.-N. Schickel, L. Pellerin, D. Carmody, G. Alkorta-Aranburu, D. del Gaudio, H. Matsumoto, M. Morell, Y. Mao, M. Cho, R. M. Quadros, C. B. Gurumurthy, B. Smith, M. Haugwitz, S. H. Hughes, J. S. Weissman, K. Schumann, J. H. Esensten, A. P. May, A. Ashworth, G. M. Kupfer, S. A. W. Greeley, R. Bacchetta, E. Meffre, M. G. Roncarolo, N. Romberg, K. C. Herold, A. Ribas, M. D. Leonetti, A. Marson, Reprogramming human T cell function and specificity with non-viral genome targeting. Nature 559, 405– 409 (2018). 29995861 PMC6239417
  7. [8]M. B. Fernando, T. Ahfeldt, K. J. Brennand, Modeling the complex genetic architectures of brain disease. Nat. Genet. 52, 363– 369 (2020). 32203467 PMC7909729
  8. [11]B. T. Staahl, M. Benekareddy, C. Coulon-Bainier, A. A. Banfal, S. N. Floor, J. K. Sabo, C. Urnes, G. A. Munares, A. Ghosh, J. A. Doudna, Efficient genome editing in the mouse brain by local delivery of engineered Cas9 ribonucleoprotein complexes. Nat. Biotechnol. 35, 431– 434 (2017). 28191903 PMC6649674
  9. [12]T. Wei, Q. Cheng, Y.-L. Min, E. N. Olson, D. J. Siegwart, Systemic nanoparticle delivery of CRISPR-Cas9 ribonucleoproteins for effective tissue specific genome editing. Nat. Commun. 11, 3232 (2020). 32591530 PMC7320157
  10. [13]Y. Rui, D. R. Wilson, J. J. Green, Non-viral delivery to enable genome editing. Trends Biotechnol. 37, 281– 293 (2019). 30278987 PMC6378131
  11. [14]A. M. Lozano, N. Lipsman, H. Bergman, P. Brown, S. Chabardes, J. W. Chang, K. Matthews, C. C. McIntyre, T. E. Schlaepfer, M. Schulder, Y. Temel, J. Volkmann, J. K. Krauss, Deep brain stimulation: Current challenges and future directions. Nat. Rev. Neurol. 15, 148– 160 (2019). 30683913 PMC6397644
  12. [15]M. Foldvari, D. W. Chen, N. Nafissi, D. Calderon, L. Narsineni, A. Rafiee, Non-viral gene therapy: Gains and challenges of non-invasive administration methods. J. Control. Release 240, 165– 190 (2016). 26686079
  13. [17]J. Li, M. Zheng, O. Shimoni, W. A. Banks, A. I. Bush, J. R. Gamble, B. Shi, Development of novel therapeutics targeting the blood–brain barrier: From barrier to carrier. Adv. Sci. 8, 2101090 (2021). PMC8373165 34085418
  14. [18]M. Trenkmann, Gold rush to gene-editing in the brain. Nat. Rev. Genet. 19, 532– 533 (2018). 30022106
  15. [19]J. Zhou, J. Liu, C. J. Cheng, T. R. Patel, C. E. Weller, J. M. Piepmeier, Z. Jiang, W. M. Saltzman, Biodegradable poly(amine-co-ester) terpolymers for targeted gene delivery. Nat. Mater. 11, 82– 90 (2012). PMC4180913 22138789
  16. [20]M. Zheng, Y. Liu, Y. Wang, D. Zhang, Y. Zou, W. Ruan, J. Yin, W. Tao, J. B. Park, B. Shi, ROS-responsive polymeric siRNA nanomedicine stabilized by triple interactions for the robust glioblastoma combinational RNAi therapy. Adv. Mater. 31, 1903277 (2019). 31348581
  17. [21]Y. Jiang, J. Zhang, F. Meng, Z. Zhong, Apolipoprotein E peptide-directed chimeric polymersomes mediate an ultrahigh-efficiency targeted protein therapy for glioblastoma. ACS Nano 12, 11070– 11079 (2018). 30395440
  18. [22]O. Shimoni, A. Postma, Y. Yan, A. M. Scott, J. K. Heath, E. C. Nice, A. N. Zelikin, F. Caruso, Macromolecule functionalization of disulfide-bonded polymer hydrogel capsules and cancer cell targeting. ACS Nano 6, 1463– 1472 (2012). 22260171
  19. [23]Y. Zou, X. Sun, Y. Wang, C. Yan, Y. Liu, J. Li, D. Zhang, M. Zheng, R. S. Chung, B. Shi, Single siRNA nanocapsules for effective siRNA brain delivery and glioblastoma treatment. Adv. Mater. 32, 2000416 (2020). 32374446
  20. [24]G. Chen, A. A. Abdeen, Y. Wang, P. K. Shahi, S. Robertson, R. Xie, M. Suzuki, B. R. Pattnaik, K. Saha, S. Gong, A biodegradable nanocapsule delivers a Cas9 ribonucleoprotein complex for in vivo genome editing. Nat. Nanotechnol. 14, 974– 980 (2019). 31501532 PMC6778035
  21. [25]H. Tian, J. Du, J. Wen, Y. Liu, S. R. Montgomery, T. P. Scott, B. Aghdasi, C. Xiong, A. Suzuki, T. Hayashi, M. Ruangchainikom, K. Phan, G. Weintraub, A. Raed, S. S. Murray, M. D. Daubs, X. Yang, X.-b. Yuan, J. C. Wang, Y. Lu, Growth-factor nanocapsules that enable tunable controlled release for bone regeneration. ACS Nano 10, 7362– 7369 (2016). 27227573
  22. [27]M. J. Mitchell, M. M. Billingsley, R. M. Haley, M. E. Wechsler, N. A. Peppas, R. Langer, Engineering precision nanoparticles for drug delivery. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 20, 101– 124 (2021). 33277608 PMC7717100
  23. [28]Y. Yan, Y. Wang, J. K. Heath, E. C. Nice, F. Caruso, Cellular association and cargo release of redox-responsive polymer capsules mediated by exofacial thiols. Adv. Mater. 23, 3916– 3921 (2011). 21809395
  24. [29]Y. Zou, M. Zheng, W. Yang, F. Meng, K. Miyata, H. J. Kim, K. Kataoka, Z. Zhong, Virus-mimicking chimaeric polymersomes boost targeted cancer siRNA therapy in vivo. Adv. Mater. 29, 1703285 (2017). 28961339
  25. [30]Y.-d. Yao, T.-m. Sun, S.-y. Huang, S. Dou, L. Lin, J.-n. Chen, J.-b. Ruan, C.-q. Mao, F.-y. Yu, M.-s. Zeng, J.-y. Zang, Q. Liu, F.-x. Su, P. Zhang, J. Lieberman, J. Wang, E. Song, Targeted delivery of PLK1-siRNA by ScFv suppresses Her2+ breast cancer growth and metastasis. Sci. Transl. Med. 4, 130ra148 (2012). 22517885
  26. [31]H. Gibori, S. Eliyahu, A. Krivitsky, D. Ben-Shushan, Y. Epshtein, G. Tiram, R. Blau, P. Ofek, J. S. Lee, E. Ruppin, L. Landsman, I. Barshack, T. Golan, E. Merquiol, G. Blum, R. Satchi-Fainaro, Amphiphilic nanocarrier-induced modulation of PLK1 and miR-34a leads to improved therapeutic response in pancreatic cancer. Nat. Commun. 9, 16 (2018). 29295989 PMC5750234
  27. [32]A. T. Tandle, T. Kramp, W. J. Kil, A. Halthore, K. Gehlhaus, U. Shankavaram, P. J. Tofilon, N. J. Caplen, K. Camphausen, Inhibition of Polo-like kinase 1 in glioblastoma multiforme induces mitotic catastrophe and enhances radiosensitisation. Eur. J. Cancer 49, 3020– 3028 (2013). 23790466 PMC3755049
  28. [33]C. D. Arvanitis, V. Askoxylakis, Y. Guo, M. Datta, J. Kloepper, G. B. Ferraro, M. O. Bernabeu, D. Fukumura, N. McDannold, R. K. Jain, Mechanisms of enhanced drug delivery in brain metastases with focused ultrasound-induced blood–tumor barrier disruption. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 115, E8717– E8726 (2018). 30150398 PMC6140479
  29. [34]S. Ding, A. I. Khan, X. Cai, Y. Song, Z. Lyu, D. Du, P. Dutta, Y. Lin, Overcoming blood–brain barrier transport: Advances in nanoparticle-based drug delivery strategies. Mater. Today 37, 112– 125 (2020). PMC7575138 33093794
  30. [35]K. G. Maxwell, P. Augsornworawat, L. Velazco-Cruz, M. H. Kim, R. Asada, N. J. Hogrebe, S. Morikawa, F. Urano, J. R. Millman, Gene-edited human stem cell–derived β cells from a patient with monogenic diabetes reverse preexisting diabetes in mice. Sci. Transl. Med. 12, eaax9106 (2020). 32321868 PMC7233417
  31. [36]T. Chen, B. He, J. Tao, Y. He, H. Deng, X. Wang, Y. Zheng, Application of Förster resonance energy transfer (FRET) technique to elucidate intracellular and in vivo biofate of nanomedicines. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 143, 177– 205 (2019). 31201837
  32. [37]Y. Liu, G. Yang, S. Jin, R. Zhang, P. Chen, Tengjisi, L. Wang, D. Chen, D. A. Weitz, C.-X. Zhao, J-aggregate-based FRET monitoring of drug release from polymer nanoparticles with high drug loading. Angew. Chem. Int. Edit. 132, 20240– 20249 (2020). 32743867
  33. [38]P. Wang, L. Zhang, Y. Xie, N. Wang, R. Tang, W. Zheng, X. Jiang, Genome editing for cancer therapy: Delivery of Cas9 protein/sgRNA plasmid via a gold nanocluster/lipid core–shell nanocarrier. Adv. Sci. 4, 1700175 (2017). PMC5700650 29201613
  34. [40]H.-X. Wang, M. Li, C. M. Lee, S. Chakraborty, H.-W. Kim, G. Bao, K. W. Leong, CRISPR/Cas9-based genome editing for disease modeling and therapy: Challenges and opportunities for nonviral delivery. Chem. Rev. 117, 9874– 9906 (2017). 28640612
  35. [41]J. M. Crudele, J. S. Chamberlain, Cas9 immunity creates challenges for CRISPR gene editing therapies. Nat. Commun. 9, 3497 (2018). 30158648 PMC6115392
  36. [43]L. Li, Z. Yang, S. Zhu, L. He, W. Fan, W. Tang, J. Zou, Z. Shen, M. Zhang, L. Tang, Y. Dai, G. Niu, S. Hu, X. Chen, A rationally designed semiconducting polymer brush for NIR-II imaging-guided light-triggered remote control of CRISPR/Cas9 genome editing. Adv. Mater. 31, 1901187 (2019). 30957918
  37. [45]R. J. Platt, S. Chen, Y. Zhou, M. J. Yim, L. Swiech, H. R. Kempton, J. E. Dahlman, O. Parnas, T. M. Eisenhaure, M. Jovanovic, D. B. Graham, S. Jhunjhunwala, M. Heidenreich, R. J. Xavier, R. Langer, D. G. Anderson, N. Hacohen, A. Regev, G. Feng, P. A. Sharp, F. Zhang, CRISPR-Cas9 knockin mice for genome editing and cancer modeling. Cell 159, 440– 455 (2014). 25263330 PMC4265475
  38. [46]D. Rosenblum, A. Gutkin, R. Kedmi, S. Ramishetti, N. Veiga, A. M. Jacobi, M. S. Schubert, D. Friedmann-Morvinski, Z. R. Cohen, M. A. Behlke, J. Lieberman, D. Peer, CRISPR-Cas9 genome editing using targeted lipid nanoparticles for cancer therapy. Sci. Adv. 6, eabc9450 (2020). 33208369 PMC7673804
  39. [48]Y. Zheng, W. Shen, J. Zhang, B. Yang, Y.-N. Liu, H. Qi, X. Yu, S.-Y. Lu, Y. Chen, Y.-Z. Xu, Y. Li, F. H. Gage, S. Mi, J. Yao, CRISPR interference-based specific and efficient gene inactivation in the brain. Nat. Neurosci. 21, 447– 454 (2018). 29403034
  40. [50]J. C. M. van der Loo, J. F. Wright, Progress and challenges in viral vector manufacturing. Hum. Mol. Genet. 25, R42– R52 (2016). 26519140 PMC4802372
  41. [55]J. K. Patra, G. Das, L. F. Fraceto, E. V. R. Campos, M. del Pilar Rodriguez-Torres, L. S. Acosta-Torres, L. A. Diaz-Torres, R. Grillo, M. K. Swamy, S. Sharma, S. Habtemariam, H.-S. Shin, Nano based drug delivery systems: Recent developments and future prospects. J. Nanobiotechnol. 16, 71 (2018). PMC6145203 30231877
  42. [56]W. A. Banks, From blood–brain barrier to blood–brain interface: New opportunities for CNS drug delivery. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 15, 275– 292 (2016). 26794270
  43. [57]R. Pandit, L. Chen, J. Götz, The blood-brain barrier: Physiology and strategies for drug delivery. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 165-166, 1– 14 (2020). 31790711
  44. [59]W. X. Mai, L. Gosa, V. W. Daniels, L. Ta, J. E. Tsang, B. Higgins, W. B. Gilmore, N. A. Bayley, M. D. Harati, J. T. Lee, W. H. Yong, H. I. Kornblum, S. J. Bensinger, P. S. Mischel, P. N. Rao, P. M. Clark, T. F. Cloughesy, A. Letai, D. A. Nathanson, Cytoplasmic p53 couples oncogene-driven glucose metabolism to apoptosis and is a therapeutic target in glioblastoma. Nat. Med. 23, 1342– 1357 (2017). 29035366 PMC5683421
  45. [60]S. A. Riquelme, C. Lozano, A. M. Moustafa, K. Liimatta, K. L. Tomlinson, C. Britto, S. Khanal, S. K. Gill, A. Narechania, J. M. Azcona-Gutiérrez, E. DiMango, Y. Saénz, P. Planet, A. Prince, CFTR-PTEN–dependent mitochondrial metabolic dysfunction promotes Pseudomonas aeruginosa airway infection. Sci. Transl. Med. 11, eaav4634 (2019). 31270271 PMC6784538

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Zou, Y., Sun, X., Yang, Q., Zheng, M., Shimoni, O., Ruan, W., Wang, Y., Zhang, D., Yin, J., Huang, X., Tao, W., Park, J. B., Liang, X.-J., Leong, K. W., & Shi, B.
Affiliations
  • Henan University (CN)
  • University of Technology Sydney (AU)
  • Harvard University (US)
  • National Cancer Center (KR)
  • Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN)
  • Columbia University (US)
Corresponding author
  • Zou, Yan
  • Sun, Xinhong
  • Zheng, Meng
  • Shi, Bingyang
Venue
Science Advances
Published
2022-04-22
Volume
8
Issue
16
Pages
eabm8011-eabm8011
ISSN
2375-2548 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4224247454
Cited by
227
References
15
Citations by year
2026: 44 · 2025: 64 · 2024: 60 · 2023: 45 · 2022: 14
FWCI
14.94
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc
Locations
  • Science Advances (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › RNA Interference and Gene Delivery
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › CRISPR and Genetic Engineering
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Biomaterials › Nanoparticle-Based Drug Delivery
Keywords
CRISPR/Cas9, glioblastoma, gene therapy, nanocapsules, blood-brain barrier penetration, tumor cell targeting, PLK1, genome editing, off-target effects, brain drug delivery, ribonucleoprotein delivery
MeSH terms
Gene Editing, RNA, Guide, CRISPR-Cas Systems, Animals, Blood-Brain Barrier, Glioblastoma, Genetic Therapy, RNA, Guide, Kinetoplastida, Mice, Nanocapsules, CRISPR-Cas Systems

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review