Cited by 114Health Policy Implementation ScienceHealth Sciences Research and EducationMeta-analysis and systematic reviews

Design and Analysis in Dissemination and Implementation Research

Landsverk, John, Brown, C. Hendricks, Chamberlain, Patricia, Palinkas, Lawrence, Ogihara, Mitsunori, Czaja, Sara, Goldhaber-Fiebert, Jeremy D., Rolls Reutz, Jennifer A. +1 more·2012·Dissemination and Implementation Research in HealthTranslating Science to Practice

Abstract

There remains a lack of consensus on methodological approaches to the study of dissemination and implementation (D&I) processes, and especially tests of implementation strategies. To begin to address these deficiencies, this chapter reviews design issues for dissemination and implementation research. It presents an overview of some of the analytic approaches to D&I research, recognizing that this analytic work is still at an early stage of development. Finally, the chapter presents a case study of research that crosses three of four recognized D&I phases and illustrates a number of design and analysis issues.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199751877.003.0012

Cites

57 of 57 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Crafting the study approach section is complicated by the current lack of consensus on methodological approaches to the study of implementation processes, measuring implementation context and outcomes, and testing implementation strategies.

    “Yet, crafting the study approach section is complicated by the current lack of consensus on methodological approaches to the study of implementation processes, measuring implementation context and outcomes, and testing implementation strategies [112,113].”
  • The traditional translational pipeline is commonly used by NIH and other research-focused organizations to move knowledge from basic and pre-intervention research through efficacy and effectiveness trials to a stage reaching the public.

    “This traditional translational pipeline is commonly used by the National Institutes of Health (NIH) and other research-focused organizations to move scientific knowledge from basic and other pre-intervention research, to efficacy and effectiveness trials, to a stage that reaches the public (66, 79).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Landsverk, J., Brown, C. H., Chamberlain, P., Palinkas, L., Ogihara, M., Czaja, S., Goldhaber-Fiebert, J. D., Rolls Reutz, J. A., & Horwitz, S. M.
Venue
Dissemination and Implementation Research in HealthTranslating Science to Practice
Published
2012-03-29
Pages
225-260
OpenAlex
W2483397181
Cited by
114
References
57
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 14 · 2012: 2
FWCI
61.76
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Oxford University Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Policy Implementation Science
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Sciences Research and Education
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty › Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
Keywords
dissemination and implementation research, implementation strategies, research design, analytical approach, implementation process, implementation evaluation, methodological consensus

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review